Shooting by ex-deputy sparks debate on "Stand your ground" law(FL)

orlandosentinel.com ^ | 9 January, 2012 | Mike Clary

[morphing libertarian]

most aggressive in the country

[Ramius]

Well, sure... But in the end what really matters is what the jury believes. What really happened might be the same thing, or might not, but its the former that makes the difference.

[sergeantdave]

I support aggressive patriots in the Golden State.

[SgtBob]

Sorry the*sarc* escaped you..that being said, the dude can’t hit his friggin’ target.

[Oztrich Boy]

How long do you think it took this ambulance chasing shyster to find this homeless guy and take him on as a client. Probably not as long as it took the deputy to pull his gun and shoot the guy. Lawyers are scum.

Reading comprehension: try it.

There are four "scum" quoted in the article.

Critical of the shooting: law professor Bruce Rogow, and yoga trainer David Frankel. (non-working lawyers)

Supporting Hernandez's self defence as lawful: Criminal Defence Lawyer assoc. president Bradford Cohen, and Joel Kaplan, Hernandez's own lawyer. (working lawyers)

[Recon Dad]

ambulance chasing shyster (add “s”)

Lawyers are scum. (I believe “lawyers” is plural)

[Celtic Conservative]

Lighten up, Francis.

CC

[SgtBob]

Yes, Sir, Sgt Hulka! ;-}

[CodeToad]

“”Historically, you were to retreat rather than use deadly force,” said Nova Southeastern University law professor Bruce Rogow. “This incident underscores the potential dangers of the law.” “

Of course, to these pinheads running away solves crime somehow.