Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

CALL CALL CALL you rep in Virginia! Let them know where you stand
1 posted on 01/12/2012 4:58:55 PM PST by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blueyon
This is the loophole in Roe v. Wade. SCOTUS refused to determine when life begins.
The problem here, is, the law could always change back again whenever the RATS become in the majority.
2 posted on 01/12/2012 5:03:08 PM PST by stylin19a (obama - "FREDO" smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueyon

After this passes, will the unborn have the right to carry firearms and have to pay taxes?

I believe our legislature could find more significant matters to focus on.


3 posted on 01/12/2012 5:07:34 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueyon; All
Don't you just love this word, "abhorrent" that the pro-abortion group has discovered?

On another thread today posted by Kaslin, the same word was used by abortion proponents in connection with another related matter. My post there was:

To see a live image of a child in the womb challenges the mother to rethink a position that represents the status quo among those who are in power today.

The fact that counterfeit ideas about life and its meaning have been promoted for several decades makes the decision for abortion a difficult one.

Many of us struggle with the questions, "What is my purpose for being?" and "Am I fulfilling the 'purpose' of my being?"

During the 2008 Presidental campaign, seeing little Trig Palin on television, a compelling thought came to mind:

"This child is achieving a purpose which far exceeds anything many of us will work for decades to achieve."

Without saying a word, but just by being, his bright little face rebukes and challenges. Carried by a proud and loving father, a mother, a sister or brother, he confronted in a way that no pious words from a pulpit or podium can confront.

And, that is why they hated the mother.

During the Christmas Holy Days (holidays), there are reminders of another innocent and guileless child whose very birth challenged a King, and whose simple message as an adult could not be tolerated, because it challenged the status quo and power structure of His day. And they hated him. Today, in America, His name simply must be removed from the title of the season.

A 240-pound quarterback Heisman Trophy winner publicly thanks his mother for allowing him life. From that point on, as a highly visibly college and pro player, he publicly acknowledges his Creator, and their attempts at ridicule are shrill and hateful. What he represents is "abhorrent," because he is a living symbol for what may be millions of outstanding athletes, world leaders, healing physicians, discoverers, musicians and artists whose lives were interrupted before they began.

Allow technology to reveal that a child is being created inside the womb, and those who have foisted the idea of a mere bit of flesh being called a "fetus" cannot contain their anger. To them, such knowledge is "abhorrent" because it exposes the fraudulent idea they call "choice."

7 posted on 01/12/2012 5:20:45 PM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueyon
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

I know it's a quaint notion, but if we are to regard the Constitution as a binding legal document, the inclusion of the word "posterity" should extend its protections not only to those in the womb, but even to those not yet conceived.
9 posted on 01/12/2012 5:24:11 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem. meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueyon

Any Virginia Democrat who opens his or her trap about this and against it, should be analyzed for any advocacy, campaigns, votes, etc. they have done on behalf of ANIMAL rights.


10 posted on 01/12/2012 5:33:45 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Will FREE REPUBLIC in 2012, morph slowly before our very own eyes, from CONSERVATIVE to R.I.N.O.????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueyon

Demomarxists are afraid that fetus would be more of a person then they would.


19 posted on 01/12/2012 6:47:04 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueyon

Delegate Herring said the bill was reckless and “divisive.” I guess she knows all about divisive, because isn’t that often the procedure practiced in abortion? Isn’t the baby “divided” in order to remove it from the womb?

Dear God, I hate the left.


20 posted on 01/12/2012 6:51:49 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson