Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran nuclear sites may be beyond reach of "bunker busters"
Reuters ^ | Jan 12, 2012

Posted on 01/12/2012 8:43:55 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Iran nuclear sites may be beyond reach of "bunker busters"

(Reuters) - With its nuclear program beset as never before by sanctions, sabotage and assassination, Iran must now make a new addition to its list of concerns: One of the biggest conventional bombs ever built.

Boeing's 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), an ultra-large bunker buster for use on underground targets, with Iran routinely mentioned as its most likely intended destination, is a key element in the implicit U.S. threat to use force as a last report against Iran's nuclear ambitions.

The behemoth, carrying more than 5,300 pounds of explosive, was delivered with minimal fanfare to Whiteman U.S. Air Force Base, Missouri in September. It is designed for delivery by B-2 Stealth bombers.

Would that weapon, delivered in a gouging combination with other precision-guided munitions, pulverize enough rock to reach down and destroy the uranium enrichment chamber sunk deep in a mountain at Fordow, Iran's best sheltered nuclear site?

While the chances of such a strike succeeding are slim, they are not so slim as to enable Tehran to rule out the possibility of one being attempted, according to defense experts contacted by Reuters.

A "second best" result might be merely to block the plant's surface entrances, securing its temporary closure, some said.

One U.S. official, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, described an attack on the underground site, about 160 km (100 miles) south of Tehran near the Iranian holy city of Qom, as "hard but not impossible."

The United States is the only country with any chance of damaging the Fordow chamber using just conventional air power, most experts say.

Israel, the nation seen as most likely to attempt a raid, has great experience in long range bombing include its 1981 raid on the Osirak nuclear

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bunkerbuster; gbu57; iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2012 8:44:03 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well we will never know until we try. I say let’s stop all the chit chat and get on with it...


2 posted on 01/12/2012 8:46:28 PM PST by Crapgame (What should be taught in our schools? American Exceptionalism, not cultural Marxism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Such bunkers have to have a way in and out...


3 posted on 01/12/2012 8:48:48 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crapgame

Leftist Media planting seeds of doubt, who would have thunk it!


4 posted on 01/12/2012 8:49:28 PM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crapgame
And try try again. Rattle the foundations of that bunker and radiation will end
it for thousands of years. I wonder if they opened any schools inside yet.
5 posted on 01/12/2012 8:53:49 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If you lined 3 or 4 of these in sequence, 30 seconds apart, wouldn’t that just keep digging the hole deeper until it was sufficient?


6 posted on 01/12/2012 8:54:18 PM PST by Allon (Since 1980, no Republican has won his party's nomination without winning in South Carolina.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allon

I was thinking the same.


7 posted on 01/12/2012 8:59:13 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pox
IDF sappers and Sayeret on a one way mission to penetrate and neutralize would not be a surprise.
8 posted on 01/12/2012 9:00:30 PM PST by massatoosits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Crapgame

Who said it had to be a “conventional” weapon?


9 posted on 01/12/2012 9:02:16 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Might be just as effective to bomb that damnable well...


10 posted on 01/12/2012 9:03:29 PM PST by null and void (Day 1086 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allon

If you lined 3 or 4 of these in sequence, 30 seconds apart, wouldn’t that just keep digging the hole deeper until it was sufficient?


I think you’re right. The Soviets had planned to do just that, but with nukes, on Cheyenne Mountain, CO, NORAD HQ. I think it’s called “Hammering”.

Someone will correct me, I’m sure.


11 posted on 01/12/2012 9:05:17 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Nuke it. We can be sure then...


12 posted on 01/12/2012 9:08:40 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crapgame

Not everyone in power believes we should have the means to go after such sites....

Sad, but true...


13 posted on 01/12/2012 9:13:01 PM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Allon
Right thinking is rewarded. You are correct. Also available, should the target designation be accurate, might be the old "skip bomb" technique or better yet a cruise missile of a high explosive conventional nature.

We of course have non-conventional cruise missiles that are also flyable into tunnel openings.

14 posted on 01/12/2012 9:15:59 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

We can always use that earthquake machine that Chavez is always rambling on about :)


15 posted on 01/12/2012 9:16:58 PM PST by Kaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Who said it had to be a “conventional” weapon? Not me! Use whatever it takes! Even Seal team 6!


16 posted on 01/12/2012 9:17:46 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Yep. B-61 Mod 11. Digs in a bit and goes BOOM!


17 posted on 01/12/2012 9:20:01 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Allon

I heard that idea several years ago, but it involved spacing them closely enough that the follow-on bomb hit while the rubble from its predecesor was still in the air.


18 posted on 01/12/2012 9:21:24 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

Drop Obama into an administrative position in the program. Their program will be in an absolute shambles rather quickly and the budget will skyrocket.


19 posted on 01/12/2012 9:22:07 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pox

That is correct Pox. There is a way in and out. Power gets in.

Why don’t the smart ones in the Pentagon just plan for destroying the power source. It takes alot of juice to run that operation, especially the centrifuges. they are piping in electricity, or generating it on site. Destroy the fuel and electric lines along with the sources. When they fix it, watch them with the eyes in the sky and destroy it again, and again.

You could do that the old fashioned ways, carpet bomb it, or with a deluge of cruise missles.


20 posted on 01/12/2012 9:22:50 PM PST by EERinOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson