Ron Paul Hates Republicans and Everything They Stand For

It’s probable that we don’t “get it” because each and every one of your talking points have been debunked as the despicable lies they are each and every time some RNC shill (like you, perhaps?) pulls them out of his/her butt and tries to smack us in the face with them. That’s why.

81 posted on 01/14/2012 3:34:53 AM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)

To: GlockThe Vote

The Ron Paul hate borders on insanity. His is spot on regarding economics, finances, inflation, 2nd amendment, freedom, etc.

That's why the title is correct: "Ron Paul hates everything [the Republicans] stand for".

82 posted on 01/14/2012 3:50:53 AM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)

Ron Paul is the perfect personification of a broken clock.

83 posted on 01/14/2012 4:05:34 AM PST by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)

Thanks for your reply, and Good Morning. I liked the way you broke down the remaining candidates. It adds to the discourse. I am not a Republican. I was hoping for a Conservative candidate running as a Republican/Independent. That has not happened since 1980. We all know who that was :) RR

It is truly sad that we have come to this point that those running for higher office come from the bottom of the barrel. Count me out, along with many others.

84 posted on 01/14/2012 4:34:10 AM PST by MotorCityBuck ( Keep the change, you filthy animal!)

Wow! Racism charges! Oh noes!! Are you Cynthia McKinney. You sure sound like her. I posted I had something I agreed with RP on. That's it. One thing. RINOS stand for nothing! That is except there own gain at our expense! Oh,and please don't laugh at me, for it hurts my fragile,little eggshell of an ego. Have a nice day!

MCB

85 posted on 01/14/2012 4:51:42 AM PST by MotorCityBuck ( Keep the change, you filthy animal!)

86 posted on 01/14/2012 8:37:57 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)

It never ceases to amaze me how Ron Paul supporters completely ignore his faults and still pimp him.

It is not their fault. They are not able to think for themselves. They can only follow their messiah.

87 posted on 01/14/2012 12:18:23 PM PST by John D

For whatever his failings as a Presidential candidate and conservative (and they were legion), no reasonable person would say that John McCain was worse than any of these clowns.

It's official then: I am not a reasonable person. Even the Mittster is better than McCain.

88 posted on 01/14/2012 12:25:49 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)

I am sure he will come out and condemn Israel for killing a scientist in Iran. His supporters take such actions and make false claims that our troops are in Iran with mercenaries raping and murdering. Where do they get this stuff?

To be fair, Paul selectively harkens to a Republican party of the past - the one that was isolationist. Thing is if you go back far enough the GOP also use to be a protectionist tariff party.

89 posted on 01/14/2012 6:12:38 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)

To: Republican Wildcat

Paul’s pork is also not a sign of being a fiscal conservative - loading up bills with earmarks and getting others to pass them into law and then personally voting against them to try to pass himself off as being against earmarks is a sign of being a stereotypical politician.

The correctness of the things Ron Paul says are not particularly influenced by the identity of the person saying them. While one might argue that fighting for pork makes Mr. Paul a hypocrite (one could equally well argue the opposite[*]) that's irrelevant to the fact that he is often the only voice speaking out against federal overreach, and the more people respond positively to that message, the easier it will be for other people (who might hopefully be reasonable in other ways) to start speaking out likewise.

[*] Suppose there were twelve districts that all chip in tax dollars equally, and nine of the twelve districts' representatives want to maximize pork spending and three wants to minimize it. If the ones who want to minimize pork spending doesn't fight for their share, the remaining districts will have $133 of money to spend for every $100 in tax money that's taken from them. Even if one were to figure that every $100 spent only provides $80 worth of benefit, every $100 in taxes paid for pork would generate more than $106 worth of benefit. Under such a scenario, those who want pork would benefit from maximizing it. On the other hand, if the representatives who want to minimize pork spending insist upon getting their fair share of the tax revenues collected, so that the districts who would be inclined to maximize pork could only get $100 of spending money for each $100 paid in taxes, then there would be far less incentive for those other districts to maximize pork since every $100 taken in taxes would only yield $80 in benefits.

90 posted on 01/15/2012 11:41:02 AM PST by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794