Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney's Mormon Problem - Is a candidate's philosophy of life and world view important?
January 14, 2012 | Ralph Mitchell

Posted on 01/14/2012 11:58:07 AM PST by mitchell001

Should American voters ask Romney and the other candidates what their philosophy of life is and what in their beliefs shapes their worldview? Also, should American voters ask the candidates about the degradation of the American culture especially among young people? I know we all have past sins, ie. Newt. However, Newt Gingrich has openly talked about his conversion to Catholicism and his reconciliation with God for his past sins. Rick Santorum openly talks about his devout Catholicism. Rick Perry is very open about his strong Christian beliefs. However, we do not hear much from Mitt Romney about his Mormon beliefs and how his Mormon beliefs shape his philosophy of life and his worldview. Should we ask Mitt Romney more questions about how the Mormon faith shapes his life?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: inman; life; mormon; philosophy; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Matchett-PI; reaganaut
Can you name one state or local precinct where Mitt Romney has been kept off a ballot or been disqualified to be placed on a ballot due to his religion?

Can you point to a single call among any sane Freepers who say that the law should be changed?

You say much to prove that you do not understand what you are talking about.

41 posted on 01/14/2012 5:23:18 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; reaganaut

There IS no -state- test for religion. Anyone of any faith is -elibible- to run for the office. That has no bearing on what -voters- may weigh in casting their votes.

If you are serious you get an F for reading comprehension.

If you are a propaganda agent you get a D+ for only hauling in really stupid people.


42 posted on 01/14/2012 5:25:31 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
So folks are like liberals, they like to write things into the Constitution that aren't there...
43 posted on 01/14/2012 5:25:59 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Should add any faith or no faith.


44 posted on 01/14/2012 5:26:25 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
I was wondering where Romney was kept off any ballot anywhere do to his religion, would let me know so I can send some nasty letters to someone.

As a side note I may use ANY criteria I choose to pick a candidate, that is constitutional.

45 posted on 01/14/2012 5:30:20 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

All Americans have the guaranteed right to consider their personal faith, and a candidates religion, when voting, it is protected by our constitution.

Don’t try to challenge that.


46 posted on 01/14/2012 5:35:08 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

“I firmly believe that the GOVERNMENT should not limit religious beliefs or that the GOVERNMENT should require a religious test for office.”

And the constitution limits the Federal Government from having a religious test. If you look up several of the state constitutions from 1776-1800 you will find that several of them had just such a religious test at the state level...remember that most of these constitutions were written be the same men that wrote the Federal constitution.


47 posted on 01/14/2012 5:35:47 PM PST by WorldviewDad (following God instead of culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Listen you want to support Romney be my guest.
Do not try and teach people on FR about the Constitution, we know the Constitution.
You want to vote for him because he is lds, go ahead.
Do not try and tell people here on FR, that we can not choose the issues we want to choose.
Romney is a stink’n liberal BASED on his political record.
Romney’s world view is important to how he governs.
Romney’s belief system is important because it is the core of who he is. Romney believes by his own involvement in mormonISM by his own rise to power in the organization
What his belief system and world view is, it is who he is at his very essence.
Romney’s belief system as well as his governance is important.
Why you do not see that is curious.
Are you are supporter as the other 94% are, or do you actually find him a decent candidate?


48 posted on 01/14/2012 5:37:49 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

You think if Republican voters dislike the anti-conservative Romney or even the Mormon cult, that people of the Mormon religion will vote Democrat?

You think the left will support them better, more represent their views, be more tolerant of them?


49 posted on 01/14/2012 5:40:38 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Well, you must just luuuuuv me to follow me all around that way!


50 posted on 01/14/2012 6:42:16 PM PST by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sand lake bar

This is a conservative site, when a romneybot liberal starts trolling the threads, she will be running into we conservatives repeatedly as we confront this pathological liar named Mitt Romney, and show the truth about him and his politics.


51 posted on 01/14/2012 6:48:51 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m a Reagan/Rush conservative from way back. I’m going to do everything I can to beat Obama. But if you’d rather play witchfinder general, then knock yourself out.


52 posted on 01/14/2012 6:52:49 PM PST by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sand lake bar

Right now you are pushing the anti-Reagan, anti-conservative candidate.


53 posted on 01/14/2012 7:46:36 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m not pushing anything. But I can see you don’t have a cite for me on that one issue so I guess we’re done here.


54 posted on 01/14/2012 7:49:44 PM PST by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sand lake bar

I guess I hit the wrong thread a while ago, you are pimping Romney on multiple threads.

You already admit that you remember him campaigning on having left the GOP during Reagan, that he ran on this “Look, I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”.

Now you want to claim that you are a Reagan conservative and you want to push this anti-Reagan liberal into the White House.


55 posted on 01/14/2012 8:08:27 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I have no idea what you’re talking about. Maybe go annoy someone else now.


56 posted on 01/14/2012 8:12:17 PM PST by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sand lake bar
Looking at your post 54 I see that it was you that got the threads confused, not me.

Either way, Let's end it with a Romney compulsion to lie, story.

"Suddenly, a heavyset man wearing a bright-orange cap entered the room. “Mr. Romney,” he called out. “Eric Orff—I’m a hunter.” It was a potentially awkward moment. Earlier this year, Romney claimed that he’d “been a hunter pretty much all my life.”

A few days later, he said in a statement, “I’ve hunted small game numerous times.”

Four days after that, Romney told W. Gardner Selby, of the Austin American-Statesman, “Any description of my being a hunter is an overstatement of capability.”

Still, he couldn’t resist. “You’re a hunter?” he said to Orff. “Well, same here. Good to see ya.”

57 posted on 01/14/2012 8:31:06 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Romney has held nearly all positions of power within the lds structure that one can have and not be called “prophet”.

And that begs the question of whether or not Romney believes the president of the LDS is a prophet of God.

I don't think a lot of Christians would feel comfortable voting for somebody who believes that the leader of their church is a prophet.
58 posted on 01/14/2012 9:01:31 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

In order for him to be temple worthy he would have to.
So since Romney is temple worthy, then he does.


59 posted on 01/14/2012 9:09:33 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut; sheikdetailfeather
"That does not change the fact that INDIVIDUAL VOTERS CAN have a religious test for office. You seem to think that the constitution doesn’t allow for that and yet there is no prohibition against VOTERS having a religious test.

You're not a careful, or thoughtful reader. To reiterate from my post #37 above:

"Pointing out your religious beliefs, and voting based on them isn’t the issue. ..."

<>

".... "...The pundits are parsing religion again. Somebody has to pose the liberals’ religious test for public office. ....

"....what infuriates [some people like] Mr. Keller ......[is the fact that] A Muslim is as qualified as a Methodist to be a federal judge if he is qualified in the law and holds only to the Constitution and shuns Islamic law. Evolution should of course be taught in the schools as a scientific theory, but not as a quasi-religious doctrine. We’re all responsible for the reputations we make, and ... we have to take the consequences. [AT THE BALLOT BOX]

"....But some of the people who imagine they’re honest skeptics only pretend their questions are about politics, when they’re really about mocking religious belief." ~ Wesley Pruden - editor emeritus of The Washington Times.

Excerpted from my post #22 above HERE

<>

reaganaut wrote: “Or are you going to vote for Mitt just to prove to yourself you aren’t a bigot?”

Answer:

To: Jim Robinson:

“Here is the vote as recorded through post 423. Let me know if I missed your vote...”~ Jim Robinson

I see I’m not on the list, so you missed mine:

To: Jim Robinson

Newt

177posted on Monday, January 09, 2012 2:53:37 PM by Matchett-PI

60 posted on 01/15/2012 10:29:52 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson