Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suit alleging MPD executed search warrant at wrong home (Maui, HI)
The Maui News ^ | January 14, 2012 | ILIMA LOOMIS

Posted on 01/15/2012 7:19:28 PM PST by bamahead

A Kihei couple is suing the Maui Police Department in federal court after officers allegedly raided their home while executing a search warrant on the wrong address last year.

April and Norman Freeland allege that police forced them outside and searched their home for nearly half an hour, even after they knew they were at the wrong location. Attorney Sam MacRoberts of the Law Office of Philip Lowenthal said the couple still has never seen a warrant for the search.

--SNIP--

The Freelands' lawsuit naming Maui County, Maui Police Chief Gary Yabuta and Maui Police officer Jerald Perkett was filed Oct. 14 in U.S. District Court in Honolulu. The suit alleges police violated the Freelands' constitutional rights and asks for $250,000 in damages and $1 million in punitive damages. Trial has been set for January 2013.

--SNIP--

According to the Freelands' complaint, they were at home hosting a dinner for three guests on April 15 when they heard a loud noise from their front lanai at around 9 p.m.

When the Freelands approached the door to their lanai they found armed men who did not identify themselves but were later identified as Maui Police officers, according to the complaint.

"When Norman Freeland touched the door, the men rushed into the Freelands' home without permission," the complaint alleges, adding that the officers did not "knock and announce" their presence as required by state law.

The officers "screamed and yelled" as they entered the home, grabbed Norman Freeland by the wrist and forced him and his wife outside, where they were held by a man carrying a "combat-type weapon," according to the complaint.

The men told the Freelands that they had a warrant but did not show it to them, according to the complaint.

(Excerpt) Read more at mauinews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; donutwatch; isolatedincident; jbt; lping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: FlingWingFlyer

What is more, if the intended site of the raid is nearby, the people there have a heads up to vamoose or make damaging evidence disappear when a convocation of cops suddenly appears down the street.

Some drug addled informant likely swore up and down this was the spot, while naming an address elsewhere on the street. There will probably be an official statement that “this informant will no longer be used” but beyond that, a stone wall.


21 posted on 01/16/2012 1:47:32 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NCDave

Even if the raid was an “honest mistake” and the evidence was in plain sight?


22 posted on 01/16/2012 3:59:07 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

I think so. They had no probable cause at all to enter that house. They could probably seize evidence, but not use it.


23 posted on 01/16/2012 4:11:43 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

“The men told the Freelands that they had a warrant but did not show it to them, according to the complaint.”

Apparently those police officers consider this little amendment to be outdated:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”


24 posted on 01/16/2012 6:35:21 AM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Eyes Unclouded; Rodney King; Redcitizen; ellery; dcwusmc; Forgotten Amendments; ...
"Whoops... Sorry, citizen. We thought you were someone else" PING

Click the link to be added to the "Whoops. Sorry, citizen. We thought you were someone else" PING list.

25 posted on 01/16/2012 9:40:06 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]




Click the Pic

End Freepathons!
Sheesh!! Do It Now!


Donate today
SIR! MONTHLY, SIR!

Sponsors will donate $10
For each new monthly sign-up

26 posted on 01/16/2012 10:06:17 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

yes, they had no right to be there at all. All “evidence” would be tied to the fact that they had no warrant for that address.


27 posted on 01/16/2012 5:44:31 PM PST by NCDave (AKA, "That idiot over there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

As long as innocent taxpayers are being sued and held responsible for the abuse of police, instead of those who actually carry it out, it will not end. The police unions are the parties that need sued just as they threatened to sue the OWS protestors. If it is good for the gander it should be good for the geese. I hate civil lawsuits because the attorneys always win, but the lack of any aggressive and serious criminal prosecution against lawless law enforcement leaves no other choice.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/10/new-york-police-union-threatens-sue-occupy-wall-street-protesters/44215/


28 posted on 01/17/2012 11:23:28 AM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Proper protocol would have been for the Police, upon realizing they were at the wrong house, to have planted some combination of narcotics, stolen firearms and child pornography, and then claim to have seen them in plain view from the front door while escorting Girls Scouts on their cookie delivery route.


29 posted on 01/17/2012 11:29:24 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson