Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Santorum Currently Up 80 Votes In Iowa Caucuses Ballot Count…
Weasel Zippers ^ | 1/16/2012 | Weasel Zippers

Posted on 01/17/2012 8:36:54 AM PST by Qbert

Oh my.

MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. — It’s conventional wisdom in Republican circles here in South Carolina that if Mitt Romney wins the state’s primary this Saturday — having already won in Iowa and New Hampshire — he’ll be the GOP presidential nominee.

“If for some reason he’s not derailed here and Mitt Romney wins South Carolina — no one’s ever won all three — I think it should be over,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday. “That would be quite a testament to his ability as a candidate and a campaigner.”

But what if Romney did not actually win Iowa? That could change the calculation considerably. And there is a very real chance that the Republican Party of Iowa will announce this week that Rick Santorum, and not Romney, won the Iowa caucuses.

Results released on caucus night — actually, at 2 the next morning — showed Romney won by eight votes, 30,015 to Santorum’s 30,007. Many observers assumed that those results were final, especially when party officials said there would be no recount.

But the results were not final. Even though there is no provision for a recount in the party caucuses, state GOP rules do require that the results be certified, which is nearly the same thing. That certification process began the day after the caucuses and is expected to wrap up this week, yielding a final, official vote tally.

The final numbers will be different from those released on caucus night. One campaign source says the vote count as of midday Monday showed Santorum ahead by 80-something votes. If that number holds through certification of the last precincts, Santorum will win. Of course, there is always the possibility that some of the final precincts will contain discrepancies that put Romney back on top. It’s just not clear.

keep reading...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gingrich; iowacaucus; romney; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Qbert

“The counter to this argument: focus on what really matters- the delegate count.”

Nobody cares about the delegate count because after the first few states the contest is usually over. Its about a once in a generation election that produces a mano-a-mano that goes all the way, for example Ford-Reagan 1976 and Obama-Clinton 2008.


21 posted on 01/17/2012 9:01:18 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

These kinds of shenanigans is why I won’t be voting Republican should Romney get the nomination.


22 posted on 01/17/2012 9:03:20 AM PST by upsdriver (We Tea Partiers need Sarah Palin for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Well I know they were essentially tied, but Romney got the headline. That transposition business is too convenient. I’m not generally into conspiracy theory, but the establishment have pulled out all the stops to get Romney the nomination.


23 posted on 01/17/2012 9:04:34 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Same here. I’ve voted for Romney three times already, and that’s enough for me.


24 posted on 01/17/2012 9:06:09 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

"Nobody cares about the delegate count because after the first few states the contest is usually over..."

People who want to win the most delegates and get the nomination care about the delegate count...

25 posted on 01/17/2012 9:07:16 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Unfortunately we are all assuming a conspiracy behind everything in today's world; my self included at times.

But sometimes things are as they are. When the media was here in Iowa; they were doing as they always do everywhere. They are always looking for a story or a spin to put on things.

They were ready to move to NH; they certainly were not going to settle for “results not yet finalized” story.

26 posted on 01/17/2012 9:16:15 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

Nah. Fox News? starts off their shows with “Romney - the winner in Iowa and New Hampshire...”


27 posted on 01/17/2012 9:17:40 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan

Fox News definitely needs a few new writers. In the gloss appearing with Lindsay Graham: “endorsed Mitt Romney in 2008.” Really. While he sat on McCain’s bus?


28 posted on 01/17/2012 9:30:21 AM PST by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

maybe Santorum wants to be VP


29 posted on 01/17/2012 9:38:50 AM PST by cantbetooconservative (I miss Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

A quick GOP primary takes conservatives out of the media and allows Obama to use his bully pulpit to control more of the election year dialogue. The press is anxious to end this thing so they can get back to Obama-loving.


30 posted on 01/17/2012 9:48:13 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Since the caucus the MSM has been pounding the line that Romney is the first GOP candidate to “win” both Iowa and NH since Ford.

That's because they want to repeat the tremendous Ford landslide victory. Sarcasm off

31 posted on 01/17/2012 10:03:18 AM PST by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Santorum said it didn’t matter.


32 posted on 01/17/2012 10:04:36 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Proof?


33 posted on 01/17/2012 10:24:42 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This isn’t a recount, it’s a recheck and certification by the state with each county of the vote totals via the paperwork the counties turned in on Form E. Most of the ballots, if there even were ballots, were in the trash by the next morning.


34 posted on 01/17/2012 10:28:13 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

The state GOP does little more than certify the results. The counting and reporting of the numbers are entirely controlled by the precinct and county chairs. It is an extremely decentralized system.


35 posted on 01/17/2012 10:35:13 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

I have no proof. But when heard about the last minute shenanigans the next day, I knew what was going on. If Santorum actually won, he would have been the news going into NH and the establishment, the manipulators, whatever you want to call them, wouldn’t have that. Romney had to be the name in everybody’s mind.


36 posted on 01/17/2012 10:38:03 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

What was “going on” by the “establishment”? Each precinct and county independently reports and documents their results, there is no central control. All the state GOP does is verify and report the results. Human error and lax policy is alot more likely than manipulation.


37 posted on 01/17/2012 10:42:09 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Who is surprised by this? Not me. The Romney “win” was manufactured for the sake of denying Santorum the headline.


38 posted on 01/17/2012 10:45:34 AM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

I just don’t trust them.


39 posted on 01/17/2012 10:58:26 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
"People who want to win the most delegates and get the nomination care about the delegate count... "

Does any of this matter? I have seen here on FR that the counting for the first few states in the Reupblican primary will be on a proportional basis, not winner take all. So, it's likely that there will be no change in delegates- or am I missing something?

40 posted on 01/17/2012 11:15:31 AM PST by matthew fuller (We are getting McCained!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson