Skip to comments.Santorum accuses Romney of playing 'dirty politics'
Posted on 01/17/2012 8:11:31 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
Rick Santorum accused rival Mitt Romney on Tuesday of running a dirty politics robocall campaign in South Carolina to discredit the former Pennsylvania senator and mislead voters in the states fiercely contested Republican presidential primary Saturday.
Campaigning at the Yorktown aircraft carrier museum in Charleston Harbor, Santorum slammed the former Massachusetts governor for an automated call that plays a tape of Santorum endorsing Romneys 2008 run for the GOP presidential nomination.
Gov. Romney, out there playing a recording from four years ago, and suggesting that Im endorsing him, is another example of Gov. Romney misleading the public about my record and what I believe in, Santorum told reporters as he left a town-hall-style meeting on the warship.
Its dirty politics, and I expect that from Barack Obama. I dont ever expect it from a Republican.
A supporter, state Sen. Larry Grooms, joined Santorum in denouncing Romney. When a man running for the highest office of the nation sanctions a phone call where one of his opponents does a fake endorsement, somethings wrong with that, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Romney using the Obama playbook to try and get elected.
I don’t expect Santorum to win in South Carolina, but maybe he’ll poll respectably enough to remain a viable candidate. I sure hope Romney loses there. Romney needs to be stopped before the convention and we must do anything we can do deny him a majority of the delegates.
For those interested.
Then we can definitely write off Santorum as Mitt VP material.
One less thing.
Yeah, a second place finish would be wonderful in SC for Santorum.
I got Gingrich calls rapping Perry months ago.
It’s time for Gingrich and Santorum to drop out and stop splitting the Perry vote! :o)
What does the robocall say? Does it actually have an old tape of santorum endorsing mitt? Sheesh that is low.
IMHO the only thing floating Santorum is he has had a complete pass in IA and got a pass in NH.
He’s just getting a bit of scrutiny now for the first time.
He certainly had Mitt on the ropes last night for a while, the he faded out.
I don’t trust Romney, but I agree with him that convicted felons should not vote.
I think Santorum was pandering to the black community when he suggested that felons after serving their time should be allowed to vote.
I also dislike his plan on social security and he just seems to have that whine thing going.
There was one other time when he became incomprehensible during the debate but I’ve forgotten what it was. He also made funny faces when someone was talking about him.
I think he’s got some big negatives.
You are so right. they’re spoilers.
Why is everyone passively lying down and letting 3 states run over us.
I think everyone with the will and enough support and money should stay in through super Tuesday anyway.
SC prides itself on choosing presidents, but they are an open vote state and with dems not having to worry about their candidate ... although they should ... they will definitely try to foul up our candidates.
I really hope Perry stays in. He is just hitting his stride and was wonderful in the debate last night.
I think the guy in the singlewide has as much right to protect himself as the guy that lives on the hill.
That said, is it Ok to give the rich guy his rights back after he pulls a madoff scheme as it is to give them back to the guy in the singlewide who got popped on a cocaine possession charge?
One was a malicious beast, and one was just foolin around.
I make no excuses for either.
How is a guy tooting an 8 ball on the weekend the same as a guy that is rigging the system?
Well, not surprised anyway.
I think they all have “issues” that need to be addressed, IMHO. :)
Mitt flat out said, he would give those rights to people “Who had left office”
A bit of a Freudian slip I suppose.
Romney is playing dirty politics. Rick is right on that.
Hmm, sounds libertarian. Course, it's not like many of them actually would vote.
the democrats aren’t coming out in any numbers to make a difference in this state.. that’s all hogwash
You can't pick and choose from any candidate's legacy, be it Mitt's smorgasbord, Paul's psychoses or the less than perfect records of any of the others. Those enamored with the 'great' Newt need to explain why the - more recent - 'terrible' Newt is no longer operative.
I know Newt can "talk the talk" when he wants. So can Santorum, Cain, Bachmann and even Romney. But can he "walk the walk?" (Perry is an odd case, he may well be able to walk the walk, but seems unable to talk the talk.) Mitt, and Newt have also proven they can talk the other side's talk. When I heard Newt talk on his health care reform ideas in DC four years ago he sure sounded like an enthusiastic, *competent*, true believer in everything I opposed. It was hard to see how a solo physician, like myself, could survive under his model. Rick is explicitly pushing small business healthcare solutions. Santorum's alleged heresies are few and mild compared Newt's. He's often been asked about them and provides answers in the longer interviews of him I've heard that at least sound honest and plausible. Other than saying "sitting on Pelosi's couch was the dumbest thing he'd ever done" I've seen and heard very little by Newt to explain his many strange affairs with liberal issues. He just does a verbal 180, throws out some random historical tidbit, often of Democrat icons (most recently Andrew Jackson, the founder of 'modern' Democrat party) and people bow at his feet.
Palin's comments on Hannity last night regarding Newt have been repeatedly cited here. I hadn't seen them live, so I tracked her full interview down online. She doesn't want our campaign to end, she wants it to continue. She believes extending the process will forge a stronger nominee in the end, whomever that may be. And she wants the candidates to be thoroughly vetted. I don't think she wants Obama to have any true surprises left up his sleeve. She said more about Newt, but she also said nice things about both Ricks and part of Paul. I believe she's encouraging the vetting of Mitt that Newt is providing, but that she would also want Newt well vetted should he become the candidate. If he can't handle vetting by his putative friends Obama would quickly have him back in the sub-W polling territory from where he abandoned his speakership.
Just like Newt's Bachmann ad, you said it Rick. Were you lying then or now? Did you endorse Romney or not? How about Arlen Specter, did you endorse him? Seems you'll sell your values if the political expedience suits you. So much for core beliefs eh Rick?
That is what worries me. If the hometown boy doesn't get any attention now, and he has a record of losing, then how is he going to stand up in a general election in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. The election is literally won by getting the conservative RATs to vote "against" a democrat (Obama). I think this is the same situation in Ohio and other states.
I'd like to see Rick start a business on his own and come back in four or eight years. Then he will be ready for prime time.
Just in time for GOP to bite each other!
He’s been doing it since 2007.
“Yeah, a second place finish would be wonderful in SC for Santorum.”
A third place finish for Romney in SC would be wonderful for the nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.