Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware the bubble’s burst (Bedrock damage at dam spillway)
Creation.com ^ | 24 October 2007(GMT+10) | David Catchpoole

Posted on 01/18/2012 8:39:46 AM PST by fishtank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Photo Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Dept of the Interior

Glen Canyon Dam tunnel spillway damage in 1983

1 posted on 01/18/2012 8:39:52 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

This is a followup to this post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2833982/posts

There were some doubts on that thread if moving water could/would rapidly erode bedrock.


2 posted on 01/18/2012 8:41:24 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I’ve seen modeling of this effect used to explain features in the Scablands resulting from the ice dam breaking and abruptly draining Lake Missoula.


3 posted on 01/18/2012 8:44:53 AM PST by null and void (Day 1093 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

More like there were cavities in the concrete from all the men who died when they fell into the concrete as it was poured! Who knows.


4 posted on 01/18/2012 8:48:25 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

Jimmy Hoffa.

5 posted on 01/18/2012 8:52:21 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Interesting.


6 posted on 01/18/2012 8:53:05 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logitech

ping


7 posted on 01/18/2012 8:58:12 AM PST by logitech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yep. Used to go water skiing on Lake Missoula. Tried to go fishing, but there were just suckers there.


8 posted on 01/18/2012 8:58:24 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

The Glen Canyon Dam is spectacular. There is a visitors center that gives a great view of the dam and the wall of the canyon on the far side of the river.

Of interest to me was a darkened band with lots of green stuff in the canyon wall. It looked to me that the impounded water had found a course between the sandstone layers and was traveling far down stream. Plants found this water in the slickrock desert and were thriving.


9 posted on 01/18/2012 9:00:55 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

You are aware< I hope, that the stories of burials in concrete pours at Hoover and Glen Canyon are just that — stories.

They were prompted by jokers leaving boots turned upside down in fresh concrete as they left their shift. Actually in these massive placements, the concrete rises at a very slow rate due to the volume and area of the placement and the need to keep the hydraulic pressures against concrete formwork manageable. On mass pours at Hoover they talked about six inches per hour.


10 posted on 01/18/2012 9:03:00 AM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
There were some doubts on that thread if moving water could/would rapidly erode bedrock.

I guess it depends on how you define "rapidly". I do know that Niagara Falls is moving slowly upriver due to bedrock erosion. (obligatory "Slowly I Turn...")

11 posted on 01/18/2012 9:11:23 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

***... but there were just suckers there.****

OWN A MONTANA RANCH! $45,000 DOLLARS WILL GET YOU A WHOLE QUARTER ACRE! DON’T LET THIS OPPORTUNITY PASS YOU BY!


12 posted on 01/18/2012 9:38:52 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( P!$$ on the Taliban. Issue MORE BEER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fishtank; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
Cavitation: another straw being desperately grasped...

If the entire world is flooded (water quickly assumes equilibrium elevation), where can that water "run" to -- especially at cavitation velocities?

13 posted on 01/18/2012 9:43:53 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

seems like cavitation releases a lot of energy.

Could that be harnessed to drive a turbine and produce electricity?


14 posted on 01/18/2012 9:51:46 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Maybe. There was talk for a while about using cavitation to drive cold fusion. I don’t think it panned out.


15 posted on 01/18/2012 9:56:07 AM PST by null and void (Day 1093 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Indeed. Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!


16 posted on 01/18/2012 9:56:14 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Niagara Falls is realtively slow speed under little pressure compared to what they are talking about here

in the NorthWest USA there are the ‘badlands’ that look as if they had massive erosion from high pressure rushing water (only explanation that makes sense) and we are talking about state-wide flows

(global flood?)

There are deep bore holes with globe-shaped rocks inside them. these are formed by rushing water and are seen all the time, but in this case these are massive!


17 posted on 01/18/2012 9:57:30 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

*shrug* Water would still run down from the mountains and high places until equilibrium was established.

Gotta give the YECs props on this one. At least this time they aren’t calling for the suspension of the laws of physics.


18 posted on 01/18/2012 10:00:18 AM PST by null and void (Day 1093 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: null and void

There was talk for a while about using cavitation to drive cold fusion. I don’t think it panned out.
...........
Yeah I saw that earlier. But I’m not such a physicist that I would know why you’d need a secondary effect like cold fusion to produce energy sufficient to drive a turbine...

maybe its that the energy needed to create the cavitation is greater than the energy released with cavitation—ie its endothermic.

That would be the logical reason for not trying to harvest the energy released by cavitation itself.

However, on first blush it sure doesn’t look like the net i/o is some fractional number given that the bubbles reach such high temperatures.


19 posted on 01/18/2012 10:12:56 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

20 posted on 01/18/2012 11:24:15 AM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson