Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Says She’d Vote for Newt
resdstate.com ^ | Jan 18, 2012 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 01/18/2012 11:43:23 AM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: antonico; Jim Robinson
Why does anyone listen to Erick Erickson? Governor Palin said IF she was in South Carolina she’d vote for Gingrich -

No one is listening to Erickson. Palin did endorse Newt Gingrich in SC's primary, no question about it. Her comment "if I was voting in SC, I'd be voting for Newt" is her way of telling South Carolina supporters of her to back Newt. Her comment about further vetting of the candidates means we need to prevent Romney from getting the nomination if we are to have any chance of rescinding Obama/Romneycare.

21 posted on 01/18/2012 12:41:56 PM PST by upsdriver (We Tea Partiers need Sarah Palin for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

A Gingrich-Santorum ticket would work well.

It would be great to have that deal made now, with Perry backing it.


22 posted on 01/18/2012 12:46:49 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Makes sense to me. If Perry and one of the other two conservatives pulled out, we would be spared a John McCain Replay at the Ballot Box.


23 posted on 01/18/2012 12:49:15 PM PST by ZULU (LIBERATE HAGIA SOPHIA!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Would have been happier if she was actually “IN” SC saying to “vote for Sarah Palin”!


24 posted on 01/18/2012 12:57:21 PM PST by LibFreeUSA (Pick Your Poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

http://www.newt.org/volunteer

...time to stop Willard the Lib. Can we count on Perry’s fans?


25 posted on 01/18/2012 12:57:50 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

You are correct. That is exactly what she said and why.


26 posted on 01/18/2012 12:57:50 PM PST by PjhCPA (Game On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Palin’s got it right. Todd, too.

Can we count on you to stop Willard’s plan?

http://www.newt.org/volunteer


27 posted on 01/18/2012 1:00:40 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Interesting, I didn’t know there were only 3 states in the union now. I thought there were 47 states still left to go in this PRIMARY election process. Now I can see I was so very wrong. My bad!


28 posted on 01/18/2012 1:01:07 PM PST by SpringtoLiberty (Liberty is on the march!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DNA.2012; Jim Robinson

With the new rules, it is a longer process, let the gov stay.
If 10% or less, force him out.


29 posted on 01/18/2012 1:01:33 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SpringtoLiberty
Interesting, I didn’t know there were only 3 states in the union now. I thought there were 47 states still left to go in this PRIMARY election process.

Actually there are 54 more states left to go.

30 posted on 01/18/2012 1:02:24 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Syncro; Art in Idaho; KC_Lion; b9; DJ MacWoW; trisham; RedMDer
Yes, but Newt/Sarah would make lib/rino heads explode!!

Going rogue!! Drill, baby, drill!!

LOL.

GO NEWT!!!

GO SARAH!

ANY CABINET SHE WANTS!



31 posted on 01/18/2012 1:02:42 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Ah yes I forgot to re_read team obamas electoral map. Mea culpa again. So sorry.


32 posted on 01/18/2012 1:04:29 PM PST by SpringtoLiberty (Liberty is on the march!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: patriot08; Jewbacca

Santorum has no hope, either.

But Santorum, as shown by his endorsement of Spector, is a RNC creature. He’s in it solely to ensure Romney’s win. Accordingly, he won’t drop out.

***

He should be asked to drop out also. Not having honor should not be an escape clause from receiving legitimate criticism.

Santorum, drop out NOW!!!


33 posted on 01/18/2012 1:05:20 PM PST by ROTB (Christian sin breeds enemies for the USA. If you're a Christian, stop sinning, and spread the Word..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I noticed the article about Erick Erickson calling for Perry to bow out is locked and points here. I’m believe that thread is important in and of itself.

Erickson is the chief editor of Red State—he runs the site. He pretty much controls everything that goes on there.

Perry made his nomination announcement at the Red State convention.

Red State has been in the bag for Perry from the get go. At times it looked like the Perry campaign was feeding them stories.

Red State is probably the largest hub of Perry supporters on the internet.

Now, what has probably been Perry’s largest supporter has officially come out and said he should drop out of the race and endorse Newt.

This is important. It would be like NRO saying Romney should get out of the race and endorse someone else.


34 posted on 01/18/2012 1:10:27 PM PST by Brookhaven (Mitt Romney has been consistent since he changed his mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Why is it only this one particular political pundit is able to say who they will vote for???

What about all the other pundits??? Kraut-hammer, Rush, hannity, Beck, whiny little juan williams, brett bear, little chrissy mathews, olberman, and the rest??

I'm sure all of us are terribly interested in who these pundits will vote for! I'm also sure that we'll all immediately change our minds and vote along with our favorite pundit!

}sarcasm off.

35 posted on 01/18/2012 1:10:36 PM PST by Logic n' Reason (N/A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

“I’d vote for you, but I can’t, so I won’t.”

That’s the best she can do! BWAHAHAHAHAH!


36 posted on 01/18/2012 1:13:26 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PjhCPA

she never implied the candidates sucked.. she was trying to be say without saying it for Perry annd Santorum to bow out and back Gingrich because that’s the only way to help defeat Romney.. she knows a win for Gingrich in SC means Santorum and Perry are done and then it’s a two man race.. exactly what I said would happen is happening.. chunks of votes from Romney, Santorum and Perry are now going to Gingrich in SC.. that means exactly what Palin wants to happen.. Gingrich is catching Romney and Santorum and Perry are fading away ...that’s your race from here on out


37 posted on 01/18/2012 1:14:11 PM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

I agree with you.

Santorum won’t drop out, as his purpose is to act as spoiler for Romney by drawing away the evangelical vote.

He is a 100% RNC creature.


38 posted on 01/18/2012 1:22:30 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
Please stop. Large colored font won't make you correct or change Sarah Palin's intent.

Were she able to vote in South Carolina on Saturday, her vote would go to Newt Gingrich.

This is no surprise to me. I've been anticipating her to back Newt Gingrich, given his solutions to save and restore our Republic, which are very much like hers.

Newt Gingrich put a lot of thought and work into his preparation for running. His isn't a vanity run.

He was leading national and state polls before Romney and Paul went scorched earth on him in Iowa, and but for those vicious ads, Santorum wouldn't be in this race right now, so let's be serious. Sarah Palin isn't politically naive. She was nearly destroyed by similar vicious attacks. She knows politics better than all of us put together, and she obviously admires and likes Newt Gingrich very much for the very same reasons his supporters do here.

She wants the process to continue! She is unwilling to see Romney win without further vetting.

Remember, Sarah Palin was the first one to suggest that Romney needed to show his inome tax returns!

John McCain's Entire Opposition Research File on Romney

NO ROMNEY!

GO NEWT!!!!

39 posted on 01/18/2012 1:24:48 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Not quite. Presumably the process would go forward just as well if Santorum or Perry won in SC, or Paul for that matter. So that fact that of all the non-Romneys she mentioned Newt should tell you something.

Maybe not a 100% endorsement, but it’s pretty close, and it’s much more of a nod towards him than any of the others. Throw in that her husband already endorsed Newt, and it’s even closer. Do you really see her endorsing someone else?

I don’t know why she went halfway last night but I’d think if Newt wins SC that she’d endorse him before FL and possibly do some events.

Perhaps Rudy and Cain could follow suit, they’re still big names in FL.

It would really set things up as a showdown. Romney and the establishment(Bush41, Jeb Bush, Dole, McCain, Christie, Hunstman, Murkowski, etc...)on one side. Newt and the base/tea party(Palin, Cain, etc...) on the other.

Would certainly be an exciting 10 days.


40 posted on 01/18/2012 1:25:22 PM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson