Boop His Tiny Tail!
Before He Turns Into an Enormous Fire-Breathing Monster
Please Donate Monthly!
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up
Posted on 01/18/2012 3:10:44 PM PST by Syncro
Oh, Ann. Tsk.
Ann, you are suffering from a romney obsessive-compulsive disorder...
Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a loser when the Romneybane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.
I am far more concerned about the new revelation that Romney made money off the disposal of aborted babies dead bodies.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/17/mitt-romney-bain-capital-stericycle_n_1211228.html
So, let me see. Romney is a successful, liberal businessman. Good for him. He should go on being one. We don’t need a progressive president.
A ream is 500 sheets, sometimes referring to the large sheets cut down to 8.5x11”, so could very well be several thousand pieces of paper.
So if the case against Mitt is a “few” sheets short of a ream, that would be just a little under 500 any way you cut it.
So it looks like Coulter has inadvertently stated that the case against mitt is HUGH....not to mention that makes it VERY SERIS!
I think her slip is quite Freudian. With or without lace.
I’ve been willing to give Ann some rope, because she has been a great force for conservatives, and she writes extremely well.
She has been shilling for the gay extremists, but I don’t think it has accomplished anything much for them.
But this really is too much. At a critical time for our country, when we have only this one more chance to turn things around, she shills for a lying scum of a RINO loser. And it couldn’t be at a worse moment.
Shut up, Ann.
Actually, the case against Romney is about 200 pages long:
Let’s see that washed-up hag spin everything in the Romney Book.
...glib, meaningless wordplay we have come to expect from brainless liberals, not conservatives.I'll leave it at that...
so that would be what, about 497 pages against him?
Ann Dowd at it again I see......
Coulter ridiculed and diminished ever Republican candidate last cycle EXCEPT WILLARD the LIB.
She has not changed.
That’s sick.......
My problem with Romney is not his hiring and firing people. My problem is he might hire you one day then change his mind and fire you the next.
Poor Ann. She has lost her moral compass. We are not finished discussing how finished we are with Romney. She hoped we would be, after she lodged him down our throat. Romney is unexciting is reason enough to doze off and dump him. We crave a little inspiration, please, while eduring our Marxism cram down and our Romney cram down. What a poor diet.
When rumors of Ann dating Bill Maher were not denied by her, I knew she had sold out.
Ann should come back to her roots like Newt did on Monday night.
I have already thrown out her books and her autographs and videos I made
She has lost her mind. Romney is the biggest liberal, Ron Paul next to or tied with him
Well,... Coulter, has not disappointed me in my assessment. Every few weeks or so she is jumping one or several more sharks.
Although a tiny thing he managed to "raise taxes on the blind" ~ but it was a clue. Later on he helped begin the bankrupting of the entire state by imposing RomneyKKKare on them.
The guy just hasn't done anything to make him popular with fiscal, social, or movement Conservatives, and without them there's no way he can win.
You do know what a ream of paper is, don’t you? I don’t understand why you felt compelled to comment on it, and inexplicably so, in the title box.
Hardcore Rombot,
We care not about the liberal wing of OUR party!
“I don’t know how Mitt Romney is supposed to explain free market capitalism to career politicians”
Can’t even explain it to Freepers these days.
After that, Willard the Lib can explain to us his $50 abortions, the public option, non-free market mandates, big government exchanges, and massive federal subsidies for his and Teddy Kennedy’s MassCare aka RomneyCare.
Are ALL of Ann’s columns about Willard these days?!
She needs a husband in the worst sort of way.
"Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands." [Source]
It’s the Kennedy wing of the Republican party.
I wonder if Ann’s publisher is connected to Bain...
Remember when Arianna Huffington was a good conservative?
Remember when Arianna Huffington was a good conservative?
Coulter and Maher have always been friends, but that is not her BFF according to Hannity, not long ago, who liked her choice, but would not give his name--even way back when you Liked her, Ms Coulter and Maher never hid that they were friendly media enemies.
That statement is very old news chatter. So what even if they were?
We could use an unlikely political couple of Mary Matalin and James Carville, Jr. To now think Coulter is not smart enough to think on her own is ridiculous and especially to blame on Maher who she has always known in the business. Mary Matalin and Carville stick to their own political persuasions and are married!
It has no bearing on anything that effects the lives of out of work, hard working employed, and retired Americans making it through a difficult economic>
I mean this becomes part of the ridiculous after a while and almost laughable in regard to Substantial issues surrounding the choice of a presidential candidate.
Division and Confusion is the very strategy what the Obama camp loves to put on "replay" and sit back following the blueprint they see working on the right.. and attempt to win by doing nothing.
It has become most difficult to know what is a Pinocchioism and what is not, when it starts getting personal.
Does this statement pass the Pinocchio test?
I will easily vote for the Republican who runs against Obama, a president who is considered the worst president in history by an overwhelming number of Americans.
I want Obama on the Hot Seat--he is just hiding in the audience at this point.
Bah, the Bain junk is not the strongest case against Romney. You’d have to completely discount a few dozen stronger arguments against Romney before you even get to the silly liberal-ish Bain arguments. Then again, it’s Ann Coulter we’re talking about here, so she’s already done that.
Ann Coulter says case against Romney is 992 pages long!!
They are gonna laugh their @5535 off at Mittens and his dog transportation practices!!!
So your genius counter-argument is what? The party should piss off the majority 70-75% of the party by nominating another RINO who can’t muster even half the support of his own party? How is that going to improve Republican turn-out?
You know that SNL skit is already scripted and ready to go as soon as he gets the nomination, and it might be more devastating than the job they did on Palin.
“Poor Ann. She has lost her moral compass”
Yeah, going to bed every night with Bill Maher will do that to you!
Sure you can. We all understand free market capitalism, and I totally support the legality of it. It is and should remain legal for people to do things like risk and invest money to buy tickets to shows and games in bulk, and then resell at as high a price as the market will bear. It's free market capitalism. It happens also to be a form of capitalism practiced exclusively by assholes, but that's the price of freedom.
I totally support the legality of you or anyone else buying up internet domain names in the hope that when someone comes along who has a legit need for the name, that someone will pay out the nose for it. Such capitalists as these -- and they are certainly practicing a legitimate form of capitalism -- drive up prices for everyone but produce zero service and zero product. They are legal leeches and pains in the ass.
If YOU want to make a living those ways, fine, but don't be surprised when people reject you as a piece of slime -- however, I am very surprised at how it cannot be explained to FReepers "these days" that rejecting such as a piece of slime is an entirely separate animal than rejecting capitalism. Indeed, many FReepers insist that we put such capitalists in the same noble ranks as folks like Henry Ford and Bill Gates.
Though to be honest, there's nothing to indicate that Romney every engaged in that kind of slimy capitalism. No, there are only indicators that this heroic capitalist helped by "financing" failing companies so they could borrow money, collected fees for doing so, transferred those company's assets to Bain, and then when the company filed bankruptcy and the creditors sought the assets to offset what was owed ... they found there were no assets and were left holding the bag. Romney pocketed the "profit" as a capitalist just being smart and knowing his way around tax and bankruptcy codes. Criticize it, and you're not criticizing Romney for being a slimy capitalist, but by Gawd, you're criticizing capitalism itself!!
Do I have that about right, Jedi? I know Brillian and Syncro will demand, "Links, please!" Well, B & S, I refer you to Jedi's posts in forum. You'll find them.
But something tells me you won't stop pretending that holding sleazeballs who make money in a slimy fashion isn't a whole nother ballgame from criticizing "free market capitalism." It's like saying folks who blame a drunk driver for a car wreck, are critizicing the entire automotive industry.
Why doesn’t Mitt just release his income tax records, now? Why wait until April
Dried up old Anne has finally jumped the shark. Now she’s just cutting off her nose to spite her own face.
[Willard has had a constant 25 to 30 support in polls.]
Which means he has a consistent 70%-75% who don’t want him. And still you wish to push him down our throats.
Couldn't help but notice that three of the first ten comments missed the irony and word play in the title of Coulter’s essay.
The business in question was a paper manufacturer.
And “ream” is also a verb, which means...well...to ream someone out.
Finny, I need a lesson in capitalism.
Explain to me exactly how Romney made a profit by financing companies that went bankrupt.
I don’t get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.