Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYPD, Feds Testing Gun-Scanning Technology, But Civil Liberties Groups Up In Arms
CBS New York ^ | January 17, 2012 | CBS New York

Posted on 01/18/2012 4:31:09 PM PST by CedarDave

The NYPD is stepping up their war against illegal guns, with a new tool that could detect weapons on someone as they walk down the street.

But is it violating your right to privacy?

Police, along with the U.S. Department of Defense, are researching new technology in a scanner placed on police vehicles that can detect concealed weapons.

“You could use it at a specific event. You could use it at a shooting-prone location,” NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly told CBS 2′s Hazel Sanchez on Tuesday.

It’s called Terahertz Imaging Detection. It measures the energy radiating from a body up to 16 feet away, and can detect anything blocking it, like a gun.

And the idea is causing quite the uproar on both sides of the privacy issue.

~~snip~~

Police Commissioner Kelly said the scanner would only be used in reasonably suspicious circumstances and could cut down on the number of stop-and-frisks on the street.

But the New York Civil Liberties Union is raising a red flag.

“It’s worrisome. It implicates privacy, the right to walk down the street without being subjected to a virtual pat-down by the Police Department when you’re doing nothing wrong,” the NYCLU’s Donna Lieberman said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newyork.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; guns; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: CedarDave

You don’t have a right to record cops in public, but they have a right to zap you with their x-ray vision DNA-disruptor whenever they feel like it.


21 posted on 01/18/2012 6:43:05 PM PST by Joe the Pimpernel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

They are also failing to mention that this is a violation of the 4th amendment. Even if these waves did no damage to DNA this would be illegal according to our constitution. Illegal search and seizure.


22 posted on 01/18/2012 7:15:41 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe the Pimpernel

23 posted on 01/18/2012 7:17:50 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FishinTX

Lead jackets? or jacketed lead? :)


24 posted on 01/18/2012 10:01:02 PM PST by Apogee (Just thinking again, got to stop that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson