Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: Gomez1960
It seems like you trust government bureaucrats to censor the Internet.

You are for government regulating the Internet so then you are against liberty and freedom.

I can't believe there are people that would give such power to EPA like unelected government, liberal, thugs to censor the Internet. That is tyranny. Why do you trust government bureaucrats to decide what is appropriate on the Internet?

Just one example of government idiocy. They said the EPA would save our environment. Instead the EPA thugs are shutting down factories and power plants because of a lie called global warming. who elected these thugs?

And it's easier for them to censor the Internet by getting Google or an ISP to ban a site. This SOPA would censor and kill the Internet, period.

9 posted on 01/19/2012 4:21:00 PM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Democrat_media

There’s only one person on this planet I trust and that would be me. My own common sense precludes someone else’s idea of what constitutes knowledge or information. I know what I need to know and I refuse to spend a second of my time worrying about some abstract “threat” coming my way because pirates have been dealt a hindrance to their free reign of thievery.

I love the assumption you make regarding my supposed support of governmental regulation of the internet. But not as much as the quantum leap you took in declaring me against liberty and freedom.

See, this is a perfect example of over-reacting to the written word of someone you do not know. Knee-jerk reactions are for the young, unintuitive or the corrupt, and you adequately missed the sublime sarcasm of my comments.

I give readers the benefit of respect by not explaining beforehand which sentences are my factual beliefs or those of which are dry wit. But I stand by my observation that this hulabaloo is much ado about nothing - another example of government action being assigned all sorts of subliminal and ulterior motives by people who aren’t part of the decision-making loop. Just because one doesn’t have proof of something doesn’t mean that irresponsible accusations should abound.

If history has proven that ulterior motives and conspiracies CAN occur, there is also no reason to expect them to at every instance of regulation.

Regulation is a tool to protect property owners, and whether any of us like it or agree with it or not, it’s here to stay because of miscreants who feel they have an obligatory right to complete and utter freedom. It is they who are in the drivers seat - not the government.

If what we’ve become as a species is one that sits around debating everything and then deciding that inaction is the best policy because of our imagined fears - then we have no future. Progress comes in fits and spurts and I can guarantee you every time something is changed to protect someone other than ourselves, there will be someone somewhere who feels the sky is falling.

This is simply an act to protect the property of those who author the very art that many are afraid of losing to censorship.

Nothing more.

Nothing less.

11 posted on 01/20/2012 4:33:56 PM PST by Gomez1960 (Yeah, I get it. But.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson