Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Rick Santorum won Iowa, why is GOP calling it a 'split decision'?
Reuters via CSMonitor ^ | January 19, 2012 | Reuters

Posted on 01/19/2012 8:26:06 AM PST by Qbert

The Iowa Republican Party will certify this month's presidential caucuses as a split decision between former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, citing missing data from eight precincts, the Des Moines Register reported on Thursday.

The party had previously awarded the contest to Romney, with an eight vote margin. The official certified caucus results are due out Thursday at 8:15 a.m. local time (1415 GMT).

The Register said the new count put Santorum ahead by 34 votes. However, results from any one of the eight precincts with "missing data" could hold an advantage for Romney, the Register reported.

"It's a split decision," the newspaper said, citing a party official in the state. There are too many holes in the certified total from the caucuses to know for certain who won, it said.

GOP officials discovered inaccuracies in 131 precincts, although not all the changes affected Romney or Santorum, the newspaper reported.

[Snip]

"The Iowa caucuses, with record turnout, were a great start to defeating President Obama in Iowa and elsewhere in the general election."

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: establishment; ia2012; iowacaucus; romney; santorum; santorum2012; santorumwoniowa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Qbert

GOP = Goofy Offal Putzes


21 posted on 01/19/2012 8:53:07 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

“If Rick Santorum won Iowa, why is GOP calling it a ‘split decision’?”


The GOP will any (and all) means of propaganda to ensure that “their boy” will be their leader. They are scared to death of Newt and the REAL conservatism he will bring into the office.

Consequently, real conservatism is red kriptonite to “good ole’ boy” republicans. That is what scares them to death and what Romney does not have.


22 posted on 01/19/2012 8:54:42 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

"Alright, we'll call it a draw!"

23 posted on 01/19/2012 8:55:41 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The vote totals were so close that they both get the same number of delegates. The primaries aren’t winner-take-all the way the electoral college is.


24 posted on 01/19/2012 8:59:53 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Because the GOP establishment leadership are a bunch of lying no good scummy bastards that want Romney.

does that help?


25 posted on 01/19/2012 9:01:41 AM PST by Breto (The republican establishment are morons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
citing missing data from eight precincts,

If it's missing now, it was probably missing then.

a win by 8 votes for Myth is a resounding win ?
a win by 34 for Rick is a split decision ?


26 posted on 01/19/2012 9:07:10 AM PST by stylin19a (obama - "FREDO" smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I read that that is what Iowa decided to call it since there are missing votes and they can’t ever say for sure...is it is a tie.


27 posted on 01/19/2012 9:07:45 AM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Chairman Strawn will be on WHO radio at seven minutes past 11, if you’re interested in getting it on the radio. http://www.whoradio.com/main.html


28 posted on 01/19/2012 9:14:45 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

You can call it whatever you want. Of the certified votes, Santorum is ahead by 34 votes BUT there are 8 precincts missing and evidently they will never be known so call it whatever you want that will make you happy. Please tune in to hear Matt Strawn: http://www.whoradio.com/main.html


29 posted on 01/19/2012 9:17:01 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

I’d suggest they call it the same thing they called it when they thought Romeny had more votes than Santorum, but with the two names reversed: Namely, a narrow victory by Santorum over Romney.

Their headlines and press releases didn’t highlight the terms “tie” or “dead heat” when they thought Romney had won it.


30 posted on 01/19/2012 9:17:55 AM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% MORE sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Missing precinct information leaves an incomplete record.

No delegates are awarded from this caucus as they are in the early process of county, congressional districts, etc. meetings all leading up to the state meeting in June which finally picks the national delegates. Who knows by then how the chosen delegates will align.


31 posted on 01/19/2012 9:24:16 AM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Karl Rove and the GOP establishment need their sorry butts whipped. I am so sick of this wing of so called conservatives. We just gotta eliminate Romney and all his orbitals.

Its Newt...he is the only one who can stand up and face all of the O’s BS with facts, clarity and conservative truths.


32 posted on 01/19/2012 9:29:24 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

The $Grand Old Party, is turning to be the party that isn’t worth $0.02 cents.

Rove, Romney, Newt, OMG, we can’t do any better than this?


33 posted on 01/19/2012 9:30:10 AM PST by DoughtyOne (This administration is Barawkward... yes lets try everything that failed in the 20th Century. NOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

When Romney was ahead it wasn’t a tie or a split decision.
Tells you who the new media wants.


34 posted on 01/19/2012 9:32:57 AM PST by maxwellsmart_agent (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight
Rove (R0)

Romney
(R0)

Gingrich (R0.5)

35 posted on 01/19/2012 9:35:18 AM PST by DoughtyOne (This administration is Barawkward... yes lets try everything that failed in the 20th Century. NOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I actually heard Rove say yesterday on Hannity’s radio show.....(paraphrase)Looks like Santorum might’ve won Iowa but if Romney wins SC it is a historic 3 time win. Noones ever done that.

Huh?!?


36 posted on 01/19/2012 9:37:25 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
You are quite right but there is a change in the status of the two reports. Today's report is the report of the official canvas, which is incomplete and will never be complete.

There is no doubt Santorum is 34 votes ahead of Romney. This would never have happened if this had not been a photo finish and human error is involved.

I did hear them say this is the most accurate and complete certification they have ever had. I guess it just shows the falibility of humans.

Strawn made a valid point that with Perry dropping out, and we have four candidates left and they are the top vote getters in Iowa. Iowa provides candidates who are less well financed an opportunity to showcase their strength and Iowa provided that--for sure for Santorum. If it had not been for Iowa, Santorum would have been out a long time ago.

37 posted on 01/19/2012 9:41:44 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

GOP establishment fuzzy math.


38 posted on 01/19/2012 9:42:44 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
It's real simple folks... The GOP is trying to shove Mitt Romney down our throats.

For the record, I will NOT vote for Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney is a White Obama with an R by his name. No Thanks!

39 posted on 01/19/2012 9:52:46 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

‘splain this to me


40 posted on 01/19/2012 11:30:13 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson