Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Count on ABC boomerang on Newt’s ex-wife interview
Canada Free Press ^ | 1/19/12 | Judi McLeod

Posted on 01/19/2012 9:34:13 AM PST by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2012 9:34:19 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Marianne Gingrich appears to give the Main Stream Media an interview every couple of years over the last 15 to 20 years just to dump on former husband.


2 posted on 01/19/2012 9:39:32 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Marianne Gingrich appears to give the Main Stream Media an interview every couple of years over the last 15 to 20 years just to dump on her former husband.


3 posted on 01/19/2012 9:39:44 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz said a mouthful when he posited that Marianne Gingrich does not say anything in the new interview that she hasn’t said in the past.

I'm reserving judgment until I see the interview. What someone told Kurtz may or may not be true.

4 posted on 01/19/2012 9:40:02 AM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Not to mention this get some Democrat votes. Particularly the folks who voted for Edwards and Clinton.


5 posted on 01/19/2012 9:40:21 AM PST by Leep (Paul/Vantura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
So we're going to hear that Newt's ex-wife (with whom he had an affair while still married to his first wife) claims that Newt likes to fool around with other women while he's married.
In other news, 2 + 2 = 4
6 posted on 01/19/2012 9:40:34 AM PST by Riodacat (And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Hell has no fury like a woman scorned”


7 posted on 01/19/2012 9:44:05 AM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Media sees Newt rising in the polls in SC and has to do what it can to protect Obama by protecting Romney until the GOP convention.


8 posted on 01/19/2012 9:44:55 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

Hell hath no fury like a woman who got her man by cheating with him on his previous wife, when she finds out that (Surprise Surprise!) he is now cheating on HER with the woman who will become his NEXT wife.

“But, but.... Hollywood always told me it was OK if a man cheated on his wife with ME - because with US it was “True Love”, and he would NEVER NEVER do the same thing to me as his wife that he did to the woman who WAS his wife.”


9 posted on 01/19/2012 9:46:35 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Marianne is simply proving that she has no class and that she would have been a lousy first lady.


10 posted on 01/19/2012 9:47:08 AM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This story is aimed squarely at women voters; which confirms the vision and wisdom of our Founders in not granting that right in the Constitution.


11 posted on 01/19/2012 9:48:12 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Gingrich and his “throw this reputedly conservative candidate against a wall and see if he sticks” bandwagon have only themselves to blame. Newt’s antics were well known before he gave up the speakership almost a decade ago. There were a different set of rules for Democrats than Republicans then and its wishful thinking to claim that it’s different now. That said, Obama’s bunch is very skillfully manipulating events. If you believe Ann Coulter, Axelrod and Co. have been using the same technique since Obama first sought political office. Republicans need to open their minds and start playing by new rules. Or come to think of it, old rules. Brokered convention. Nominate a person that isn’t in the current weak field who is acceptable to all of the other contestants. They need to give voters something credible to vote for and resume attacking Obama’s record relentlessly. Otherwise, Obama will accidently get reelected, and people will give up on the GOP when they should be abandoning the Democrats.


12 posted on 01/19/2012 9:48:17 AM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
NEWT AND HERMAN, NEWT AND HERMAN
13 posted on 01/19/2012 9:48:21 AM PST by FrankR (When you vote based on race...race is all you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

After reading the article in Esquire last year, I vowed I’d never support Gingrich. The guy has no core. Whats scary is its in his own words. Go read the article and then tell me this stuff is irrelevant or just a “hit job”. Gingrich lacks good judgement to be POTUS and we should’nt be so quick to lower ourselves to run to him. He’s a dirtbag


14 posted on 01/19/2012 9:50:12 AM PST by Terrence DoGood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

And now we have heard from the brand new member Romney-Santorum Campaign staffer. Thanks.


15 posted on 01/19/2012 9:51:54 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Her viciousness proves Newt was correct to cut her loose. She will say anything to damage him now. Every word she speaks should increase Newt’s public support.


16 posted on 01/19/2012 9:52:26 AM PST by Rapscallion (Beware that we do not allow a Gestapo to form and call it Homeland Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What’s the difference between Bill Clinton vs. Newt Gingrich handling of sexually tainted information on them? Newt didn’t hire a squad of goons to go out and “rough up” to shut up the accuser.


17 posted on 01/19/2012 9:53:54 AM PST by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The liberals prefer Democrat candidates who are serial cheaters on their wives, or who accumulate hundreds of millions of dollars WHILE they’re president. No double standard here. /sarc


18 posted on 01/19/2012 9:54:41 AM PST by Spok (Who is Sam Zemurray?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

ELECTION BY PRESS. This is worst than the old Soviet Propaganda machine. The liberal press is destroying who they want
HEY ABC I DARE YOU TO VET AND INVESTIGATE OBAMA
TIME FOR REVOLUTION


19 posted on 01/19/2012 9:55:08 AM PST by sonic109 (no compromise with Marxist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Terrence DoGood

The media hasn’t even started to mention the hypocrisy of the Clinton impeachment and Newt’s open marriage either. Yes they are two different things but the media will lump them together.


20 posted on 01/19/2012 9:56:38 AM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson