Posted on 01/20/2012 5:52:29 AM PST by truthkeeper
Will Ron Paul benefit from Rick Perry dropping out of the presidential race? There’s been lots of talk today about how Newt Gingrich might pick up voters from the Perry campaign’s demise, but less about how it might affect the libertarian from Texas, who – it must be noted – is now one of only four major candidates left in the race.
Congressman Paul himself joked about picking up Perry supporters Thursday morning. Asked for his reaction to the Perry news by a CBS News reporter, Paul said, “I’m glad, I’ll have all his votes!” Then he laughed. Clearly, he was kidding.
“If somebody else likes a Texan maybe [they’ll] come to me,” Paul continued, then kept moving along shaking hands with supporters.
Strictly speaking, Paul certainly will benefit from Mr. Perry pulling out. Mr. Gingrich won’t get all of Perry’s support. Paul, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum will all pick up a share.
(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...
P.S. Ron Paul refuses to release his tax returns!
Nope
Is this a news article or wishfull thinking on the part of the Monitor staff?
I cannot understand why Christian Science has survived but the paper is actually sort of interesting as long as you read it knowing there is falsehood in the Christian Scientology
*snort*
Now that’s funny. Most Texans I know think Paul is nuttier than squirrel crap.
Tax returns? I’d rather see a mental health report.
No way, Jose!
Ha
Will Ron Paul Pick Up Many Of Rick Perry’s Voters?
Only the ones on drugs.
If Perry had enough voters to matter he would still be in the race.
I am amazed how naive most writers are about endorsements. There’s no thinking on the part of Perry or Newt that Perry’s endorsement is going to magically translate each Perry supporter to Newt. It’s not about that.
It’s about timing, and this was perfect.
It’s about momentum, and with that, Perry’s kind words might impact undecideds, left over Bachmann folks, or squishy Santorum voters who were debating whether or not to switch to Newt.
Further, it could harden support from squishy Newt voters who also liked Perry.
In other words, it is sheer shallow lazy thinking to contemplate this in terms of “the Perry 5%” or whatever. The impact might be much greater, or much less, than that 5% when it’s all said and done.
I’ve never seen so many consonants in one tagline. :-)
The premise is stupid. Why would people who support a reasoned person go to a member of the lunatic party.
LOL...is that for real??
Now this is like asking ‘Will it snow tomorrow in hell?’. Sometimes I just think some ‘journalists’ are simpletons and whether that is the case or not they certainly thing most of us are. Ok Paul and Perry are both elected officials from Texas and both served in the military. They share some of the same ideas on the size of govt but I don’t know ONE Perry supporter for who Paul would be their first choice now that Perry has dropped out and I know many of them some of them who were a part of the campaign from the beginning. I’m sure there may be a few just like I’m sure that some John Huntsman supporters went to Newt and Santorum. Some voters are eclectic and when talking with real voters sometimes its a ‘Dear God experience’ similar to the shows where a camera is shoved into a passer by’s face and they offer their humble ‘reasoning’ for supporting a candidate and you realize that all the well thought out reasons and arguments for supporting such and such that political gurus dwell over are like a fly in a hurricane for many voters.
At 2% or so it won’t matter one way or the other regardless of have the fall.
Yep. Austin liberals have been trying for over a decade to dig up dirt on Rick Perry.
If I had to bet I’d bet Newt gets the lion’s share of Perry’s votes on Sat.
Not this one. Yes, Governor Perry was my guy. I believed that he was the most qualified and conservative candidate in the race. I will continue to follow Governor Perry in my support of the man he wisely endorsed, Newt Gingrich.
With Perry gone, that leaves only 3 candidates who have had only one wife and has (as far as we know) been faithful to that one wife.
“With Perry gone, that leaves only 3 candidates who have had only one wife and has (as far as we know) been faithful to that one wife.”
Yes. Unfortunately, one of them is a spastic, anti-Semitic, Muslim-loving, 9-11 truther lunatic. Yet another is an oily, phony, dishonest, homosexual-pandering, Planned-Parenthood-donating-abortion-enabling liberal. So those two are out of the running.
So we have left a reasoned guy who has made huge mistakes and asked for forgiven and stated he is a repentant man but married a third time.
Another who is a muslim lover, 9/11 truther, racist, anti-Semite but married once.
Another who is a pro-homosexual agenda, pro-abortion, anti-gun guy but married once (unless you count the celestial marriages in his “temple”, then he would be a polygamist.)
The another guy who seems to be a perfectly nice fellow with reasoned thoughts and married once but hasn’t won anything in years, and was unable to to keep his senate seat.
Got it.
P.S.
-Ron Paul says he will NOT accept his congressional pension.
-He gives back a large portion of his current congressional pay to the Treasury each year.
Recently it was $70,000 that he gave back.
-He is the only one who says that if, elected he’ll only accept presidential pay of around $39,000 per year - the average for an American worker - not the $400,000+ per year salary currently paid presidents.
P.S.
-Ron Paul says he will NOT accept his congressional pension.
-He gives back a large portion of his current congressional pay to the Treasury each year.
Recently it was $70,000 that he gave back.
-He is the only one who says that if, elected he’ll only accept presidential pay of around $39,000 per year - the average for an American worker - not the $400,000+ per year salary currently paid presidents.
I’m not deeply knowledgeable about Catholic repentance but I know my Presbyterian preacher would have looked for someone to repent to both God and the injured. Don’t see Newt’s ego allowing the latter. Don’t get the sense Newt’s been successful with making apologies to his 2nd wife.
Gratuitously insulting a candidate, with whom you may disagree on certain issues, neither refutes his arguments, nor does it advance the cause of any other candidate. All it does, is make it more difficult for Republicans to come together, after the Convention, to defeat Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.