Posted on 01/20/2012 10:57:39 AM PST by GregNH
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Is this for real?
This is gonna be good...
Yes, but the Judge doesn’t have ‘standing’...
Racist judge, no doubt.
Just another racist at work.
Dear Judge,
Too busy, can’t find the time, wife can’t find a sitter.
call me later BHO.
Ya forgot “Golf Game with Reggie”.
That is my understanding.
So if he doesn’t show, will the judge find him in contempt?
The truth will be known someday.
Hopefully it will come out in time to matter.
“In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if” enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.”
“requires him to interrupt vacation or golf game” is more like it.
I am beginning to wonder if this Judge Mahili may just go down in history as one of the many people who saved this great Republic.
| ... Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus the argument regarding service is without merit. Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied. SO ORDERED, this 20th day of January, 2012. MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge |
I have a feeling someone will have their Tax Returns audited for the last 20 years....
Naw, he’s far too busy presidentin’ to show up. Besides, who told some stupid judge they could tell “We Won” what to do? He insulted the judges of SCOTUS to their face at the SOTU, so we know the regard he has for judges. Unless, of course, he appointed them and they routinely side with whatever it is he wants to do.
Is this a great day or what? RINO Romney is collapsing as the frontrunner. Eric Holder deputy pleads 5th to questions about F&F. Obama forced to testify on NBC.
hotdamn !
If true, why isn’t this in BREAKING ??
We all must remember though, holder hasn’t had a chance to threaten uhhh I mean talk with the Judge yet. Remember Judge Carter in California that suddenly had a change of mind about discovery and judging the merits of the case.
bwahahaha
6 days...... I’m sure it would just be a hop skip and a jump from Disney World. It shouldn’t put him out that much! lol
"Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing
Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012
ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012."
-end snip-
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-malihi-denies-obamas.html
Obama will not even prove that he was born in the US.
Whoa. Is this really going to happen??
Rules of civil procedure call for a default judgment if he doesn't appear.
A default judgment means the claims of the plaintiffs are deemed to be proven.
You know its juicy when it takes less than six minutes for an OBOT to show up
“argument regarding service”...
Is this the same thing that Clinton tried? That he’s technically “active duty military” because he’s CinC?
Let us pray /\
Just conjecturing, but...
if he ignores the subpoena, and is summarily ruled against,
and still simply ignores the ruling...
then what?
Congress wouldn’t impeach, and even if they did, Reid would dismiss it out of hand.
Aren't all elected to be treated the same as all citizens?....the president is no different...he is NOT above the law.
I sent this to DRUDGE
Oh come on. Subpoena our communists dictator in chief. Fat chance.
“Rules of civil procedure call for a default judgment if he doesn’t appear.
A default judgment means the claims of the plaintiffs are deemed to be proven.”
Works for me!
if he ignores the subpoena, and is summarily ruled against,
But, Georgia can then keep his name off the ballot because he will not prove he is eligible. One state at a time!!!
this judge went to Boston University law School. looking for more info on the man
If Obama does not show up the Georgia Judge should rule summarily against him.
No man is above the law not even the president, and this is a Georgia issue of his applicability for the position of president, and thus elegablity to be so listed on the Georgia ballot.
This is great news. Does Zero have to bring Betty White’s birth certificate with him?
The big eared Kenyon PUNK, won't be there. Him and Holder both consider themselves to be above the law
LOL. The chances of him showing are nil but I admire this judge.
Even if Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama had been birthed in the Lincoln Bedroom of the White House Obama is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Would the legal guys here please give us commoners a good idea of how important this? Just spittin’ in the wind, or a big storm blowing in?
Well, well, well ..
Link
More likely: summary judgement for the plaintiffs, which means no Obama on the ballot for the GA primary.
Your feeling is probably correct. Hussein has a thing for using the IRS as a his personal Gestapo.
“But, Georgia can then keep his name off the ballot because he will not prove he is eligible. One state at a time!!!”
Of course, Obama could reason that he’s not going to win Georgia anyway, so it’s no real loss not to be on the ballot.
Now, if he were to be kept off a swing state ballot, that might really be something to cause him grief.
If that happens, the wall the Resident has built around the issue of eligibility will collapse, as quickly as the Berlin Wall did.
"Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell filed a notice to produce records against Obama in the Georgia Ballot Challenge. Attorney Hatfield also filed a motion for determination of placement of burden of proof in the challenge. Also Judge Malihi issued an order today related to the motion for determination which is linked below. All 3 new filings linked below.
From the Notice to Produce:
Pursuant to OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.19, Defendant Barack Obama is hereby notified to be and appear before the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, the Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding, at the Fulton County Justice Center Building, 161 Pryor Street, Courtroom G-40, Atalanta, Georgia on January 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and to bring with him into said Court the following items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case:
(a) One (1) of the two (2) original certified copies of Defendant Barack Obama's ("long form") Certificate of Live Birth as referenced in the four (4) pages of Exhibit "A" attached;
(b) All medical, religious, administrative, or other records of or related to Defendant Barack Obama's birth;
(c) Any and all United States Passports, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama;
(d) Any and all passport, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama from any country, nation, or sovereignty;
(e) Any and all college and university admission information, both undergraduate and postgraduate, for Defendant Barack Obama, including, but not limited to, admission applications; letters of recommendation; school transcripts; financial aid applications; scholarship applications; and any and all correspondence awarding admission, financial aid, scholarships, or the like;
(f) Any and all applications and accompanying materials submitted by or for Defendant Barack Obama to the State Bar of Illinois, the State Supreme Court of Illinois, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and any other similar entity regulating the admission to the practice of law;
(g) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant Barack Obama;
(h) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant's father, Barack Obama Sr.
(i) All correspondence between Defendant Barack Obama and any other person, firm, political party, or entity discussing Defendant's status vel non as a natural born Citizen pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
Defendant will note that the preceding items are requested hereby, whether they pertain to Defendant under his name Barack Obama or any other name, including but not limited to Barack Hussein Obama II; Barry Soetoro; Barry Soebarkah; Barry Obama, or the like.
Then he'll go and shut down Disney World again.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.