Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's John King Sends a Message
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | January 20, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/20/2012 11:21:54 AM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Let's go to the audio sound bites. This is the very beginning of it. This is John King opening the debate on CNN.

KING: Mr. Speaker, I want to start with that this evening. As you know, your ex-wife gave an interview to ABC News and another interview at the Washington Post, and this story has now gone viral on the Internet. In it she says that you came to her in 1999 at a time when you were having an affair. She says you asked her, sir, to enter into an open marriage. Would you like to take some time to respond to that?

GINGRICH: No. But I will. (cheers and applause) I think the destructive, vicious, negative nature of much of the news media makes it harder to govern this country, harder to attract decent people to run for public office, and I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that. (cheers and applause.)

RUSH: That's another standing O for the Newtster. I told Cookie, "Don't cut the applause. I mean, gotta cut it at some point, but leave enough of it in so we get the idea for people who didn't see it." It was on CNN last night, not everybody saw it, I guarantee you. So the sound bites will be useful today. So Newt says, "I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that." Under his breath he says, "even though I knew exactly you were going to do it." Nobody will be able to convince me Newt did not expect this at the top of the debate and was ready for it. He might have been appalled, but he was ready for it. Here's John King retorting.

KING: Is that all you want to say, sir?

GINGRICH: Let me finish.

KING: Please.

GINGRICH: Every person in here knows personal pain. Every person in here has had someone close to them go through painful things. To take an ex-wife and make it two days before the primary a significant question in a presidential campaign is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine. (applause) My two daughters, my two daughters wrote the head of ABC and made the point that it was wrong, that they should pull it, and I am, frankly, astounded that CNN would take trash like that and use it to open a presidential debate. (cheers and applause)

RUSH: "Even though I fully expected it! Even though I hoped for it. I wanted them to ask me this question! I was hoping they would ask me this question; I was prepared to answer this question. I knew it was coming. I wanted to tell 'em what reprobates they are, a bunch of people that appall everybody -- and they never do anything like this to the Democrats. They run out and they do everything they can to protect Barack Obama." It was red meat! People ate it up. Standing O after standing O, two of them in one week for Newt Gingrich. John King continued, then...

KING: As you noted Mr. Speaker, this story did not come from our network. As you also know it is a subject of conversation on the campaign. I'm not --

GINGRICH: John...

KING: I -- I -- I get your point. I take your point.

AUDIENCE: (booing)

GINGRICH: John, it was repeated on your network. You chose to start the debate with it.

KING: Meh.

GINGRICH: Don't blame somebody else. You and your staff chose to start this debate with it.

KING: Eh...

AUDIENCE: (cheers and applause)

KING: Eh...

AUDIENCE: (cheers and applause)

GINGRICH: Now let me be quite clear.

KING: Okay.

GINGRICH: Let me be quite clear: The story is false. Every personal friend I have who knew us in that period says the story was false. We offered several of them to ABC to prove it was false. They weren't interested because they would like to attack any Republican. They're attacking the governor; they're attacking me. I'm sure they'll presently get around to Senator Santorum and Congressman Paul. I'm tired of the elite media protecting Barack Obama by attacking Republicans.

AUDIENCE: (wild cheers and applause)

RUSH: Right on, mama!

AUDIENCE: (sustained cheers and applause)

RUSH: Oh, yes, right on! Right on, right on.

AUDIENCE: (sustained cheers and applause)

RUSH: The audience is eating it up! They're eating it up off the floor. They're sucking it up with straws! They love it! Now, let me tell you one thing here, folks: You cannot shame the mainstream media. If any of you are thinking that the media learned a lesson -- if any of you believe that the media finally had it handed to 'em, if you believe that the media had their eyes opened and they are fully awake now and they understand what they're dealing with -- forget it. John King is proud of what happened last night. John King is a hero in the Main Street media because he didn't back down, because he continued to illustrate how it is that the media does really control the agenda. That was a demonstration of the power they hold over every public figure's head, that they choose to hold like a guillotine.

John King... There may even be some jealousy and envy within the journalist ranks (well, not journalists; within the Democrat Party ranks) because John King is a guy that got in Newt's face, stared him down -- and the fact that Newt told him off? It's a badge of honor. If you are thinking that John King was embarrassed and ran away with his tail tucked between his legs and learned his lesson and it'll never happen again? Ah, ah, ah, ah. You cannot shame the mainstream media. They are proud of this. They delight in their power to destroy candidates that they don't like. They revel in the fact that they can keep so many conservatives from even thinking about getting into politics. A lot of the so-called journalists watching this probably were pumping their fists.

A lot of the journalists watching this were doing the Obama cheer: "Yes, we can! Yes, we can!" and do not doubt me. If you think King was embarrassed -- if you think he was suffering from an elevated heart rate during the middle of this, if you think he felt shamed, if you think, "Oh, my God, Newt's beating the crap out of him" -- you are dead wrong. He got exactly what he wanted out of this. Do NOT doubt me. At the end of the day the message to every conservative who hasn't run for office is: "You want a piece of this? You want some of this? You want Brian Ross hounding you and your ex-wife and then you want me asking you about it on national TV the next night? Come on in. We're ready." That's the message from John King and CNN last night, and do not doubt me on this.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here's John King, sound bite number four. Very quickly get this one in...

KING: It is an issue in the debate. Some of the other candidates are talking about it; voters are talking about it in this state. It was my judgment, my decision, and mine alone. If we're gonna deal with it, let's deal with it up front; let's not try to sneak it into the middle of the debate somewhere and people at home either agree with that or disagree with that. You make a decision; you ask the question -- and this is politics. This is politics. He's trying to promote himself, promote an agenda. Of course he's gonna attack us. I don't take that personally. We had a nice conversation afterwards. I've had a long relationship with the Speaker. We don't always get along but I get how the business works.

RUSH: That's John King afterwards accepting accolades, by the way, from the CNN analyst bench on the way he did this. I mean, that is a homerun for John King last night, and don't think otherwise. Don't doubt me.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: No, no, no, folks. Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not criticizing Newt on the John King back-and-forth and I'm not saying it was pointless -- and I'm not saying it shouldn't happen. I think it's great. What it does is illustrate that they can be dealt with. But you can't beat 'em. They're not gonna be shamed. They're not going to be shamed into stopping the coverage of conservatives as they do it. It's going to continue. No matter what kind of shame you think they suffer in a contest like that -- no matter how much money they lose, no matter how many of them get fired, no matter how many magazines or TV stations or newspapers get shut down -- they are not gonna change. They are hard-core, leftist radicals right out of the White House.

That's where they get their marching orders. That's why I call them the State-Controlled Media, but Newt's standing up to them the way he has shows that Republicans can win doing so. How many consultants have told Republicans never to do what Newt does? How many consultants say, "Don't ever do that! You can't win with the media. Don't ever do that. They're gonna come back and hate you twice as much and destroy you," and that's why most Republicans don't do what Newt did this week, and it's a reason why so much of our candidates don't do it, either. But I ask you: Did Newt win or lose last night by doing this? Did he get hurt? Let me put it that way: Did Newt hurt himself with South Carolina voters or Republican voters at large by taking on John King that way?

He did not hurt himself. Now, we're told -- Republicans and conservatives are told -- by our consultants, "The independents don't like that kind of thing. The independents don't like that kind of confrontation! The moderate voters don't like that. Moderate voters want us to get along, want to work with each other. Don't treat Democrats that way, don't treat the media that way," but look! Three standing O's for Newt this week. I'm not saying don't do it. I'm saying do it all the time. Just don't think that these people are shameable. Don't think that they're going to start loving us. Don't think they're gonna start agreeing with us. Don't think that that can happen as a result of this.

That's all I'm saying. Nothing more. I'm not suggesting Newt shouldn't have done it. Quite the opposite. It lets everybody on our side know that they're not alone, that they're not isolated. There's all kinds of upsides to doing it, but one of the upsides that isn't gonna happen is the media saying, "Gosh, we've been so mean to these people and so unfair. You know, maybe we ought to start being fair." That's not going to happen. It just isn't, and I don't mean to be depressing you here, but it just isn't gonna happen. We're gonna get to the phones here in a second, but two sound bites: David "Rodham" Gergen's debate analysis on CNN after it was over.

GERGEN: This is one of the most explosive moments we've seen in debate history, and one of the harshest attacks we've seen on the press that I can remember in a long, long time. Very personal in the beginning. As a political matter I think Gingrich saw a fastball coming and, for this audience, he smacked it right out of the park. I think there's a reasonable chance, after talking to people there, that he could win South Carolina based on that answer.

RUSH: Sooooo! David "Rodham" Gergen... If you want to know what Washington conventional wisdom is -- if you want to know what Washington, DC, groupthink is -- just listen to what Gergen says, and "Rodham" Gergen there said Newt could win South Carolina because of this answer. He could win South Carolina because of that. (interruption) What's so funny in there? (interruption) Oh. (interruption) If they don't, they'll figure it out at some point in time.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: We're gonna start in Washington with Eric. I'm glad you called, sir. You are up first and it's wonderful to have you with us.

CALLER: Rush, good afternoon. It's nice speaking to you again.

RUSH: Thank you, sir.

CALLER: Well, the question to me is -- Gergen stole my thunder here a little bit, but -- why would the Drive-Bys, Mr. King, lob this fastball down the middle of the plate for Newt to hit it out of the park? The only thing I could come up with is that they misread the way he was gonna answer.

RUSH: No. Mr. King told you the answer in his sound bite. Grab sound bite number four. Stick with me on the phones. John King told us himself why he did this, and I'm gonna add to it. But here is John King explaining his decision to do it and do it first.

largeKING: It is an issue in the debate. Some of the other candidates are talking about it; voters are talking about it in this state. It was my judgment, my decision, and mine alone. If we're gonna deal with it, let's deal with it up front; let's not try to sneak it into the middle of the debate somewhere and people at home either agree with that or disagree with that. You --

RUSH: All right, that's enough. "Not sneak it in. If we're gonna deal with this, let's do it up front." In other words, "I'm gonna show you my courage." In other words, "I'm gonna show you my guts." It was all about John King. It wasn't about setting Newt up. The hope was that it would be a curveball for Newt, that he would somehow flub it up and they could take him out. Remember, their objective is to take all these people out, Eric, at one time or another. Their objective is to take Romney out. Their objective is to take Newt out. But this was all about John King going first. "Look at me! Look at my gonads! Look at my guts! I am the man here tonight. I am fearless." That's the answer to your question.

CALLER: (silence)

RUSH: Hello? Testing, one, two, three? Are you there?

CALLER: (laughing) No, I hear you, Rush. So are you eliminating the possibility that they misread the way that Newt was gonna answer?

RUSH: No. No. I think they knew that he was probably gonna be prepared for it. They're not idiots. They're hoping he botched it. They're hoping that he would flub it up by being embarrassed. But they had to know Newt has been getting standing O's attacking the media. They had to know they're setting him up to attack them -- and it's like I told you in the last half hour: This is a badge of honor. For the media, for John King, that whole back-and-forth is a badge of honor. He told us. (summarized) "I'm not gonna sneak it in in the middle. That would be cowardly. I'm not gonna play a trick here. I'm gonna be Mr. Up Front! I'm gonna do what most people think is not gonna happen here -- and to those who do think it's gonna happen, I'm gonna let 'em know they're right."

I understand this. I understand the psychology. Look, I know liberals, folks. I know exactly why they do what they're gonna do before they do it. I told you I had an e-mail from my old buddy Andy McCarthy who wanted to set up a little office pool yesterday on the percentage, the odds that the whole Marianne Gingrich thing would come up in the debate. He said, "I'm gonna tell you guys it's 75% it will come up." I wrote and said, "Andy, it's a hundred percent from the top. It's the whole reason for tonight. That's how the debate's gonna start; and that's gonna tick off the Santorums, it's gonna tick off the Romneys -- and if Paul knows what's going on, it's gonna tick him off because it's gonna give Newt the stage for the first ten minutes in a way that they will not be able to match the rest of the night. That's the theory. Remember, they're there to take all of these people out.

That's their agenda. King probably thought that he could return to the question near the end of the show and bring it up again as he set them up for their closing statements, closing arguments, but Newt kind of shut the door on that. You know, Ed Sullivan put the Beatles on at the top of the show. Ed Sullivan didn't play the trick of waiting 'til the last half hour of the show. He put 'em on at the top of the show and he brought 'em back for an encore at the end of the show. That's what was happening. This was a show, folks -- and it was a performance for Newt. He knew this was coming. He knew it was coming. I'm not belittling it in any way. I've told you honestly and up front exactly what I think of all aspects of this, that was a win-win for him.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cnn; gingrich; johnking; newt; rush

1 posted on 01/20/2012 11:21:57 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I am listening to Rush. My opinion is

First, I want to thank all the networks and cable TV for helping me validate my conclusion that they are mostly Obama's servile, complaisant, undistinguished media (SCUM).

Thank you, employees of Obama SCUM!

If only they would admit that they are not objective then they would be NO SCUM; and there'd be no criticism from me; because like conservative talk radio is they'd be honest about their bias. What a concept! Until then they are scum.

2 posted on 01/20/2012 11:27:01 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Rush is right. Again. When the leftists and the media attack you it is abject surrender to apologize or to try to mollify them. What you do is exactly what Gingrich did last night and what Dick Cheney has done in the past and that is to hit the bastards back as hard as you can.

If you apologize they smell blood and they come back for more. You watch now, this issue with Newt will be forgotten in the media by Sunday night because they know they won’t get anywhere with it. And they’ll also mind themselves around Newt as they go forward knowing that he’ll turn pitbull on them if he’s provoked.

Way to go, Newt!


3 posted on 01/20/2012 11:34:29 AM PST by MeganC (No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Rush said “they are shameless” so your answer as to when they’ll admit their bias is “never” because it would undermine their mission to propogandise and help indoctrinate and/or stupify America.


4 posted on 01/20/2012 11:35:32 AM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Harder to attract decent people to run for public office...”

Rather, harder to attract decent non-progressive people to run for public office. (Make that non-communists to run for public office.)


5 posted on 01/20/2012 11:36:30 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

YouTube

Newt Destroys John King, Media Over Ex-Wife Question To Thunderous Standing Ovation

6 posted on 01/20/2012 11:40:37 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Pi$$ on the Communist News Network in general and John King in particular Lame Street Media serves only themselves and their master in the White Hut!
7 posted on 01/20/2012 11:40:46 AM PST by mongo141
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin

I had to miss Rush today so thanks for the transcript.

Who gives a crap about the MSM, or would ever waste time trying to convert them?

The question will be, how many people who’ve heard this exchange now think more highly of Newt because he didn’t take King’s crap and gave it right back to him.

We shall soon see.


9 posted on 01/20/2012 11:42:06 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
KING: It is an issue in the debate. Some of the other candidates are talking about it; voters are talking about it in this state. It was my judgment, my decision, and mine alone. If we're gonna deal with it, let's deal with it up front; let's not try to sneak it into the middle of the debate somewhere and people at home either agree with that or disagree with that. You —

Okay now it is dealt with time to move on..I loved the look on this CNN goons face when Newt gave his answer..

10 posted on 01/20/2012 11:43:43 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess it’s safe to say that Dianne and Georges’ premature ejaculation somewhat fizzled. Be intereting to see what their next BS storm looks like....


11 posted on 01/20/2012 11:46:34 AM PST by arrdon (Never underestimate the stupidity of the American voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLD

Notice too, that after the first time at :53 where King looks like he just swallowed a pickle, CNN keeps the camera on the crowd during the ovations and applause. As it should be, since the audience was by then the story, but I don’t think we need the body language maven to tell us who was in charge and who got schooled in that exchange.


12 posted on 01/20/2012 11:50:45 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

My gift to King, Chrissy Mathews, Schultz, all of them is to never watch their shows or the ABC, NBC, CBS channels they
are on ever. Galt their market.
The only time I watch CBS, CNN,MSNBC,whatever is if, and only if there is
a college or pro football game I decide I want to see.


13 posted on 01/20/2012 11:52:59 AM PST by deep trout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

John King will get rave reviews from his cohorts in the msm but in fly over country Newt won big time. People are wanting someone who has a spine and will stand up to the MSM. GO NEWT GO!


14 posted on 01/20/2012 11:54:12 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrdon

They could be seriously concerned with a Gingrich victory in SC as it could gather steam and offer some serious competition to their leader. This isn’t the way it was supposed to play out. (so far). I always knew the BS line that they were most afraid of Romney meant that it was someone else....GO NEWT!


15 posted on 01/20/2012 11:55:53 AM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
So these things are so critical for voters to know. . .and so, just where was ABC when John Edwards was playing 'husband' and Father. . .to Rielle and baby? They know; they sat on it; just as they 'sat' on Monica so as to not damage Clinton. And a host of other Dems ignored. Absent as well; any effort to throw light on the shadow side of Obama. .

Duty only calls; when a Repub is 'on the line'.

I hope someone begs the question of John. . .and all at ABC and their ad nauseum, clones. "Why Newt?" and not all the others; past and present DemRATS.

16 posted on 01/20/2012 12:07:35 PM PST by cricket ( We have occupiers in our White House. Vote them out (and vote Newt in).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I think perhaps it was a failed attempt to try and drive a wedge between the candidates and start a sort of sanctimonious feeding frenzy. In my observation liberals believe that conservatives are self-righteous, sanctimonious hypocrites. I think they were hoping the other candidates would turn on Newt and beat him over the head with the bible. Fortunately liberals fail to understand true Christianity also and their transparent attempt failed.
17 posted on 01/20/2012 12:25:30 PM PST by America always
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I've had a long relationship with the Speaker. We don't always get along.
Why not? You're supposed to be a reporter - i.e. objective. Feckin' commies.
18 posted on 01/20/2012 12:26:55 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But you can't beat 'em. They're not gonna be shamed. They're not going to be shamed into stopping the coverage of conservatives as they do it. It's going to continue. No matter what kind of shame you think they suffer in a contest like that -- no matter how much money they lose, no matter how many of them get fired, no matter how many magazines or TV stations or newspapers get shut down -- they are not gonna change. They are hard-core, leftist radicals right out of the White House.

For any conservative politician to believe they can "get the media to like them" or "get the media to hear them out and treat them fairly" is exactly like Neville Chamberlain thinking he could get Adolph Hitler to be reasonable by giving him Czechoslovakia. Hitler and his people were laughing at Chamberlain while they were making a fool out of him in front of the entire world and the court of human history.

Hitler had no desire to "be reasonable," and even as that fact became obvious to anyone with a brain, Chamberlain refused to see it and refused to adjust his approach to dealing with Hitler. Hitler had no desire to live in peace with his neighbors. Hitler was planning to conquer the world.

Liberalism, and the Main Stream Media which is its slave and mouthpiece, is no different. Politicians on our side who decline to see this are living in a dream world.

19 posted on 01/20/2012 12:42:16 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Again, we learn the MSM is in bed with Obama.

Like Jim Nabors is wont to say, "Surprise, surprise!"

20 posted on 01/20/2012 12:57:40 PM PST by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

John King and Juan Williams might have just helped to elect Newt as the next president of the USA.


21 posted on 01/20/2012 1:03:01 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

“John King and Juan Williams might have just helped to elect Newt as the next president of the USA.”

You and I are on the same wave length. I have had those exact thoughts myself. I was thinking the other day that PBS fires Juan so now he gets more time on Fox and would it not be ironic that Fox now puts Juan on the debate panel and he asks the question that helps vault Newt into the Presidency.


22 posted on 01/20/2012 1:30:58 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I have to disagree with Rush.

The media and the comies have realized like Ceaucescu that they have gone too far.

Reap what you sow. They shoot from the hip and force a Fortuna culture without reasonable process and respect there of and they start to hear some very angry nasty conservatives.

These “follow the party line, you must be a loser cuz I am one” communist collectivist BS imposed from the hip is a disaster staring at their faces now.

A terrorist begets rule by terror, and the communists in the media are going to fry.


23 posted on 01/20/2012 1:48:43 PM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

When a journalist asks a question like that they should get a response like this, This is the last response you will ever receive from me for the rest of my life. Then ignore/shun him/her. There are some who would be reduced to writing obits for the remainder of their career in short order.


24 posted on 01/20/2012 1:52:57 PM PST by W. W. SMITH (Obama is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

Gingrich, schooling both the press and 0bama during the presidential debates... priceless.

Hope he uses the word “Marxist”.


25 posted on 01/20/2012 2:04:06 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That's why I call them the State-Controlled Media

I prefer DNC Stenographers Pool, but Rush's works just as well. Regardless, they are Leftist tools that, in a perfect world, would be ignored.

26 posted on 01/20/2012 3:49:20 PM PST by Major Matt Mason (The Chicago Way isn't the American Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

interesting read, thx (from someone who feels dirty whenever he gets near a television set).


27 posted on 01/20/2012 4:36:46 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (religion + guns = liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLD

King looked like he had been punched in the stomach. I don’t think he expected what he got.

I wish Newt had gone even deeper into the media’s failure to address Democrat failings, but always highlighting the Repubs. He could have even mentioned a few names, like Kathleen Willey, John Edwards’ consort, Riehl Somebody, and Rev. Wright, etc.

Go Newt, Go!!


28 posted on 01/20/2012 7:13:13 PM PST by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Gingrich, looking cooler than the other side of the pillow: “No. But I will.”

At that point, the debate was over and won by Newt.


29 posted on 01/20/2012 7:29:51 PM PST by Rodney Dangerfield ( www.zombietime.com - The true face of the left that the MSM refuses to cover.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All
First, I want to thank all the networks and cable TV for helping me validate my conclusion that they are mostly Obama's servile, complaisant, undistinguished media (SCUM).

I am so stealing that!

Thanks!

30 posted on 01/21/2012 7:23:10 AM PST by Prov1322 (Enjoy my wife's incredible artwork at www.watercolorARTwork.com! (This space no longer for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson