DeMint Endorsement? Nope, Desperate Romney

Fitsnews ^ | Januaty 20, 2012

[Finny]

You have GOT to be kidding!!!

You, Charles Wayne CT, a die-hard Romney supporter in 2008, part of a gang that regularly flat-out LIED about Romney "endorsements"!!! One of the claims you Romney sycophants made back then was that Michael Reagan endorsed Romney! So I went to Romney's own official campaign website, and indeed saw the endorsement -- identified as an official endorsement, touted there, words of nice praise from Michael Reagan, "Romney is (such and such, nice things)." Finding it hard to believe my eyes that Michael Reagan had actually officially thrown his support to Romney, I dug deeper and found the original column from which the quoted "endorsement" was lifted, and THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE following it was: "The same could be said for Rudy Giuliani."

Pretty obviously NOT intended by Michael Reagan as any kind of endorsement, let alone an official one, but deliberately misrepresented by Romney's people to be just that.

So PU-LEEEEEEZE, Charles Wayne, have a little self respect, for crying out loud!!! Oh, yes, I know you must be scandalized at such misrepresentation!

If it IS what Newt's doing, it bothers me, and I'm not afraid to say it. But for YOU of ALL PEOPLE to pretend to be outraged --

-- that's RICH.

[Finny]

Foxx, ping to my post 21. CWCT is a HOOT!

[ansel12]

Here you are, still fighting in Romney’s behalf.

[b9]

Bachmann DID gush over Newt - even calls him a Renaissance Man!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8zz5myJ_hs&feature=player_embedded

[Tennessee Nana]

Willie Mitty shot himself in the foot again...

This time he cant blame his SuperPac and whine he has no say in the matter...

its his campaign...hes the boss...

Typical lyin Willie Mitty...

Lyin, cheatin, unreliable, untrustworthy..

[greyfoxx39]

Thanks for the ping, Finny...I well remember the MittBots.

[Finny]

Thanks for the link!

[CharlesWayneCT]

Only you could object to me calling Romney wrong for claiming a DeMint endorsement he didn’t get this time.

The question is, why.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Here's my quote: I would be upset if I endorsed someone in 2008, and people pretended I supported them now.

Since that is what Romney is being accused of, and therefore I am complaining about what he did, you have a bizarre interpretation of the words "fighting on Romney's behalf".

Maybe you object to my asking other people whether they think that what Romney is doing is worse than what Gingrich is doing. But asking that question clearly isn't fighting for Romney, since it pre-supposes that Romney is doing something wrong, and only asks which wrong would objectively be considered worse.

As I said, I'd be pretty upset if I endorsed someone in 2008, and got accused of doing it now. That was a sarcastic attack on people like Finny, and maybe you, who do this to people like me ALL THE TIME, but now are outraged when Romney does it. My point is it is wrong when Romney does it, and it's wrong when you do it, and when Finny does it, and when others here do it.

An endorsement in 2008 does not mean, or imply, endorsement or even support in 2012. And now that I see you all understand that clearly, I'll call you out on it when you pull that crap on me.

[ansel12]

Is their use of DeMint’s words from 2007 worse than Gingrich using Bachmann’s words from other contexts suggesting she is talking about Gingrich as a Presidential Candidate?

Good old Charles, doing what he can for Mitt, within the lines.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Well, what do you think the definition of “worse” is? If I ask whether your implication is worse than the Romney campaign’s implication, do you think that means I support your idiotic comments?