Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Rents, Low Wages and the Coming Homeless Surge
Fiscal Times ^ | 01/22/2012 | By MICHELLE HIRSCH and ALIX PIANIN

Posted on 01/22/2012 5:36:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Get ready for the next big financial bubble—the growth of America’s homeless population.

The biggest boon for the homeless was President Obama’s 2009 stimulus package, that appropriated $1.5 billion to the Homeless Prevention and Rapid-Re-Housing Program that temporarily aided homeless and near-homeless households. According to a report issued Wednesday by the National Alliance to End Homelessness, the program has helped more than one million impoverished individuals find housing, but it is set to end this fall.

“The resources provided by [the program] have run out in many communities … and the debt and deficit at the federal level have already begun to shrink assistance available to the most vulnerable,” Nan Roman, president and CEO of NAEH, said at a news conference. “The failure to sustain this early recipe for success threatens to undermine progress now and in the future.” A separate report from the same organization released in September noted that the ranks of the nation’s homeless could swell by five percent over the next three years if no similar programs replace the program.

The View from the Street Veda Simpson, a former methadone addict, was homeless for ten years, living in shelters, crack houses and what she dubbed “abandominiums” in public housing complexes. Then last year, thanks to a federal housing voucher, she moved into an apartment in Washington, D.C.’s North Capitol area.

“I used to go in the kitchen and fit my body up under the sink in the cabinet—you have to adjust your body to get up under there—and I used to have to sleep in there so security wouldn’t find me,” Simpson told the Fiscal Times. “I slept in there for about six months, and it was rough.”

Simpson, a vendor for StreetSense, a daily newspaper about the homeless, is one of thousands of people who managed to get off the streets and into housing in recent years, despite one of the worst recessions in modern history, according to experts and homeless advocates. Now she lives in subsidized housing with her eight cats, and says she is two months away from earning certification as a veterinary technician through an online program. “It’s really hard being homeless,” she said. “I don’t see nobody who wants to continue like that. They’re trying to better themselves.”

There are glimmers of good news about the homeless. The NAEH report found a slight decrease in the overall number of people living on the street between 2009 and 2011 -- the ranks of the nation’s homeless fell by one percent, or about 7,000 people.

Across the country, 636,017 people were identified as homeless in 2011 compared to 643,067 in 2009, according to the Departments of Housing and Urban Development, Justice, Labor, Commerce and Health and Human Services.

With the troubling spectacle of homeless people and panhandlers loitering on street corners of downtown areas in many cities, it’s hard to imagine that the problem of homelessness is actually waning. The NAEH study cautions that the plight of the homeless is likely to grow more acute because of low-paying jobs, high housing costs and the loss of emergency federal assistance.

Double-Up Trouble One of the report’s chief findings is that the number of people “doubling up”—living with friends, family, or nonrelatives—rose by more than 50 percent between 2005 and 2010, and 13 percent between 2009 and 2010. Those arrangements are the most common gateway to homelessness, and the increases mean more people are getting to that “last stage” before they are forced onto the streets, Roman said. “Doubled-up people have an elevated risk of homelessness….Thirty percent of all homeless shelter residents and 44 percent of adults in families who use homeless shelters were doubled-up prior to entering the shelter system,” the report said.

Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Wis., told reporters that children are bearing the worst of the emotional brunt of “doubling up,” and many of them show that by acting up in school.

“The homeless people I see are not alcoholic, drunk men lying on a grate—the stereotype of a homeless person,” said Moore, a member of both the House Budget and Financial Services Committees. “They’re kids who live with grandma one weekend, the other grandma the next, auntie the next week, moving from school to school to school.”

The report also highlights the fast rising number of poor households that are devoting more than half their income to rent. Those families and groups are highly vulnerable to losing their housing in the coming years, the report stated. Between 2007 and 2010, there was a 22 percent increase in the number of these so-called “severely housing cost burdened” households.

Shamekia Murray knows this situation all too well. She couldn’t keep up with her rent payments after she was forced to accept a $15,000-a-year pay cut at her Washington, D.C. community health clinic job. She and her then-five-year-old son were evicted from their apartment and her car was repossessed.

Murray and her son slept on friends’ and family members’ sofas for eight months, while she continued to hold down her job as a dental assistant. “I wasn’t used to having to ask someone, ‘Can I borrow $20 to pay for the Metro subway?’ I was used to turning the key in my own home, having family gatherings, and having my son sleep in his own bed. “All that got taken away from me in less than a year,” she added. “It got to the point where I just broke inside.”

Murray, now 33, sought transitional housing for eight months to get on her feet before going out on her own. She recently received a job promotion, and now rents a two-bedroom apartment. “It’s a matter of knowing what it is that you want, and knowing that you’re not ever going to go back,” she said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homeless; rent; unemployment; wages

1 posted on 01/22/2012 5:36:18 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How’s that “free trade” thing working out, America?


2 posted on 01/22/2012 5:38:34 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think it’s amazing how when the democrats are in charge there are no homeless or at least it’s not a problem


3 posted on 01/22/2012 5:40:52 AM PST by SPRINK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Exactly what do you have in mind when you say “free trade”?


4 posted on 01/22/2012 5:41:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

Perfect timing......homeless population explosion just in time for a republican POTUS

MSM throws party.....

NYT buys extra barrels of ink....


6 posted on 01/22/2012 5:43:58 AM PST by Popman (Obama is God's curse upon the land....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

HUD and Wall St. friends of BO will figure out a way to turn all those foreclosed homes into HUD Section 8s.

Taxpayers soon to be landlords without getting to put the rent checks in the bank!!!


7 posted on 01/22/2012 5:46:13 AM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Exactly what do you have in mind when you say “free trade”

Outsourcing.

We do not have "free trade". Only imbalanced, anti-American trade.

In fact it's not trade at all. Only spending, and ever-growing unemployment.

8 posted on 01/22/2012 5:46:13 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So in other words we need to pay more taxes so the gubmint can pay the rent for the “homeless”.


9 posted on 01/22/2012 5:50:25 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"How’s that “free trade” thing working out, America? "
It is working out excellently.... Hows that increase in government regulations, taxes, fees, and fines working out for you?
10 posted on 01/22/2012 6:03:41 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Absurd.

Nothing is working out excellently.

America is falling into ruin.


11 posted on 01/22/2012 6:05:08 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Ditto. 1 percent spins they create jobs. Well their recklessness on Wall Street and protected by their puppets in Congress killed 11 million jobs. Who taught the Chinese and Indians how to do jobs Americans used to do? In 1980 China could not run a factory and be proficient as an American one. Who taught them? Corporate America (1 percenters) who thought they can make even more money by teaching Chinese workers how to do it. Same with Indian workers. I remember a Chinese American buddy of mine who worked for ATT was sent six months to Shanghai to teach the Chinese how to write software for a cellphone network. He was chosen because he can speak fluent Mandarin. I told him that if the Chinese master that his software division will be laid off by ATT. He acknowledged that. If he refused the assignment he will be on the shitlist for future layoffs. Three years later ATT laid off his entire division. All assignments were done by the Chinese. Those good paying jobs are now gone. So how will the families of the 1 percent go shopping if crime makes it unsafe for them to not have bodyguards? How much of their gross salaries must be taxed so sufficient food stamps and unemployment benefits are funded to prevent social unrest? Worst the PLA can access the technology to modernize and one day kick the US out of the Far East and the Western Pacific with the technology our greedy corporations gave them.


12 posted on 01/22/2012 6:08:04 AM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

See how Easy it is. Initiate a program like this in the background; have the money run out; demonize Republicans for not wanting to extend these benefits; media starts their campaign, and we have another built-in welfare program forever. Nobody says they have to stop drugs, get treatment, go learn a trade...just add more money to the budget and go on our “merry way”. Been done thousands of times by the politicians.


13 posted on 01/22/2012 6:24:02 AM PST by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

ah contraire, my dear friend... it is all working out perfectly (for the communists) the increase in rules, regs, etc. and a president actively engaged in driving jobs offshore ( and the last president did his part too )and the generous government handouts, designed to create a permanent dependent class, have come together perfectly.... free trade is not the problem, communists and socialists are the problem, and as bad as fubo is, bushie 2 was not a whole hell of alot better.... entrenched ruling class politicans have to go, regardless of party affiliation... only then, can the American people once again move to the head of the line...


14 posted on 01/22/2012 6:24:37 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

We respectfully disagree then.


15 posted on 01/22/2012 6:26:38 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“It’s really hard being homeless,” she said.
“They’re trying to better themselves.”


16 posted on 01/22/2012 6:39:19 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

“And yet the Washington establishment keeps pushing illegal immigration, etc. etc. etc.”

The housing problem is one of the reasons they push illegal immigration; they want the here as consumers (who might buy your house).


17 posted on 01/22/2012 6:58:09 AM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

“Free trade” naturally causes the countries with the highest standard of living to fall as their workforce becomes too costly; why pay for an American worker, and deal with the safeguards involved, when you can have Red Chinese slaves knee-dip in mercury manufacturing everything?

The 1% does create jobs - in Asia.


18 posted on 01/22/2012 7:02:07 AM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“free trade”?

You mean that system where when a bunch of bankers tank their portfolio, we bail them out and guarantee their bonuses? That free trade system?

19 posted on 01/22/2012 7:07:21 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Get ready for the next big financial bubble—the growth of America’s homeless population."

It has been postulated that the next fiscal crises will result from the States being unable to meet pension obligations. Perhaps homelessness will be one of the effects.

20 posted on 01/22/2012 7:07:55 AM PST by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dimes to dollars that the homeless kids don’t have a two parent family. Usually the dad is missing.

That is the problem. Homelessness is but one fruit of it.


21 posted on 01/22/2012 7:45:31 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

***In January, 2006 I predicted a huge housing crash coming.****

I was saying the same thing. I told my wife to look for another 1984 housing crash.

The only difference is we don’t have the high inflation rate...yet.


22 posted on 01/22/2012 8:33:40 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There are no more homeless in this country after Obama took office. Those people at the parking lot exits begging for money? They’re now known as “MINSTRELS”. Happy-go-lucky people who entertain the public with their quaint costumes and funny signs. Democrats - “Don’t fix it! Rename it!”


23 posted on 01/22/2012 8:39:21 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

These homeless figures are artificially inflated.
* A girl kicked out of her apartment and moving back in with Mom with the baby isn’t homeless, she just moved. But when the adult moves back in, it’s counted as “homeless”.
* If a woman with children moves into a shelter, she gets placed in an emergency list to get a Section 8 living place, versus waiting a few years to move out of her mother’s place and into “her own”. She counts as homeless for that time, but it is really gaming the system to jump ahead in line.


24 posted on 01/22/2012 10:32:19 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

I’ll never forget the homeless woman I once encountered on a downtown street sidewalk. She was begging for cash to get by. As I had just bought a take-out lunch and was headed back to my office, I offered her my lunch. She declined, saying she never ate on Tuesday and Wednesday, that those were her drinking days and she would rather get the cash.


25 posted on 01/22/2012 10:43:44 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Except for Fannie and Freddie, I don't think we lost any money bailing out the banks.

You don't think they were examples of free trade, do you?

26 posted on 01/22/2012 1:35:32 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

Lehman Brothers didn’t get any bailout cash.


28 posted on 01/22/2012 2:18:42 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle
I'm pretty sure all the companies that borrowed money also paid bonuses. So what?
30 posted on 01/22/2012 2:47:09 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

Could it be that Section 8 is keeping rents higher than what working people can afford?


32 posted on 01/22/2012 2:59:13 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
They repaid your tax dollars. At a profit to the Treasury.

giving them tax dollars for bonuses?

Giving? You gotta be joking.

And what does this have to do with Andy's silly claim about free trade?

I guess higher tariffs would have prevented the housing crisis?

33 posted on 01/22/2012 3:06:07 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle
Banks had plenty of money to give bonuses, but they needed to shore up their capital.
Solyndra, not so much.
Failed companies? LOL!
Lots of failed companies that somehow paid back their huge TARP loans. Plus billions in interest.
35 posted on 01/22/2012 3:20:51 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

That’s awful! Bonuses and they repaid the loans.
Something must be done!
Higher tariffs, for the children!


37 posted on 01/22/2012 3:35:22 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

No, not two months later.

But paid back, at a profit.
Unlike Fannie, Freddie, GM and Chrysler.


39 posted on 01/22/2012 3:48:26 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Bailing out AIG was a bailout for GS, by the way. Solyndra was not a jobs program, BTW. It was a bailout for the principal investors with a lot of vigorish for a Washington law firm who did "legal work" greasing the skids for this deal.

PS. I don't respond to shills.

40 posted on 01/22/2012 6:20:02 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
“Last year Merrill Lynch’s chairman Stan O’Neal retired after announcing losses of $8bn, taking a final pay deal worth $161m. Citigroup boss Chuck Prince left last year with a $38m in bonuses, shares and options after multibillion-dollar write-downs. In Britain, Bob Diamond, Barclays president, is one of the few investment bankers whose pay is public. Last year he received a salary of £250,000, but his total pay, including bonuses, reached £36m.”

All hardworking men, slaves to the discipline of the marketplace, struggling to compete by improving products and services demanded by the consuming public, taking their lean years along with their fat years. [/sarcasm]

41 posted on 01/22/2012 6:29:52 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

And you don’t respond when I make you look silly.
That’s okay, I understand.


42 posted on 01/22/2012 6:59:40 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

You shill for your overlords and you talk about others looking silly.


43 posted on 01/23/2012 5:33:32 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Talk more about overlords, that won’t make you look silly.


44 posted on 01/23/2012 7:43:38 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson