Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Throws a Temper Tantrum (BARF ALERT)
Fox News | 01/22/2012 | Me

Posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:03 AM PST by stratboy

Ann Coulter was just on Fox and Friends. She was crying over the fact that Romney got decimated in South Carolina. She offered a few talking points from the Romney camp including:

1. Newt is the lease conservative of all Candidates running. 2. Newt is unelectable because of his failed marriages. 3. The Freddy Mac non-issue. 4. John K asked a legitimate question and he is a completely fair and honorable reporter. 5. South Carolina is going back to it democratic roots and backing someone who calls Obama a socialist.

She laid out the establishment talking point that everyone who voted for McCain, will vote for Romney, that we need to get the independents.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; coulter4romney; faghag; mittbait; offherrocker; personanongrata; pleaseeatsomething; rinoann; romneybotzot; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-295 next last
To: Mr Rogers

I never thought I’d agree with you on anything.


151 posted on 01/22/2012 10:32:29 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: JudyM; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; 230FMJ; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; ...
He is toxic. So, nominate him and feel great about Obama term II.

Thank you for your concern, JudyM. We're still not going to vote for Myth. ZOT!

To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.

152 posted on 01/22/2012 10:39:38 AM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: JudyM
Photobucket
153 posted on 01/22/2012 10:45:20 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Nathaniel

Ann is awesome – period. I do not think she’s in LOVE with Romney – neither am I. He, in her opinion, (one I share), is that Romney is merely the most electable. Newt IS NOT the conservative we need.

Hmmmm! Why did I just have an urge to spit?
I’m calling this one bullcrap.
And I’m a girl.


154 posted on 01/22/2012 10:47:41 AM PST by billys kid (Everything in Massachusetts is illegal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

Oh, that’s good. Very, very good.


155 posted on 01/22/2012 10:53:36 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

LOL! Absolutely.


156 posted on 01/22/2012 10:59:46 AM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Nathaniel
He, in her opinion, (one I share), is that Romney is merely the most electable. Newt IS NOT the conservative we need.

Just in case you missed the last debate, I suggest you listen to Newt take on / down John King and the SRM. He took that first question and hit a home run with his answer. He has the spine we need to take on 0 bummer. IBTZ!

157 posted on 01/22/2012 11:04:11 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

you wrote:

“She recently said Romney is the most conservative candidate in the race, and that was before Perry dropped out.”

In the race, yes, but not conservative overall. Remember, Ann begged the NJ gov. to jump in.


158 posted on 01/22/2012 11:09:04 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
I just found out here last night that Hume’s gay son was having an affair with a House enemy of Newt

Interesting. I missed that. Link?

159 posted on 01/22/2012 11:09:43 AM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4sYInQpUOg

Get her flat on her back and give her a snack!


160 posted on 01/22/2012 11:16:36 AM PST by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

It looks like Coulter is coming out with a new book, “How to Talk to a CONSERVATIVE (If You Must)”.


161 posted on 01/22/2012 11:16:36 AM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyM; 50mm
Click!


162 posted on 01/22/2012 11:18:30 AM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: JudyM; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; 230FMJ; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; TheOldLady; Vendome; ...

Concern Troll Zot!!

163 posted on 01/22/2012 11:29:02 AM PST by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

To think I used to respect that harpy. I/we didn’t change. It did.


164 posted on 01/22/2012 11:35:52 AM PST by piytar (The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

well, bye.


165 posted on 01/22/2012 11:36:52 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101; 50mm; darkwing104; jimrob

Can I get some lightning here?


166 posted on 01/22/2012 11:38:57 AM PST by piytar (The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101; 50mm; darkwing104; jimrob

Ah heck, I responded to the wrong post. I meant to respond to pinetop’s.

Sorry, Common Sense 101. My bad!!!!


167 posted on 01/22/2012 11:42:46 AM PST by piytar (The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I have not missed an election, primary, or runoff election since I turned 21 and first voted in the Tennesse 1964 primary election and I’ve NEVER voted for a democrat or in a democrat primary, donated to and worked for many candidates who I did not totally agree with, especially presidential candidates. I know the beginnings of and history of the Republican Party and they have for many years been “the party of fiscal responsibility,” only not in practise. The “Conservative” element of the party more often than not has to hold their nose to vote election day, the country can’t afford the disaster this time that occured four years ago. In the late sixties the leaders of the Republican party would describe the democrats as “the loyal opposition” and would go on to say “We have the same goals, just a different way of arriving at them” this was and is BS. This is the same group that got rid of Newt and if you look at his accomplishments and at the reduced spending during his tenure and the spending spree that started when the successflly deposed him. This is the same group yhat is opposing him today. I choose to refer to them as Rino Elitest at times even though I send them money and help them win elections out of what I see as no viable altertanative at times. Rino Elitest is actually not as bad as some things those of my ilk get called by democrats, media and RINOS. I have refrained from using tha name for years but I’m sick and tired of the only alternative to the democrat party being controlled by a minority and go about destroying Conservative Republicans. Forty percent of Americans describe themselves and we are allowing a minority to control the Republican party and set the rules for primaries and the convention to favor the “establishment” Republicans, if you like that better than “RINO ELITEST”, Conservatives in all states need to find out how to participate in their precient caucus, take their beighbors get conservatives elected to the county and state conventions and or run for party office or for delegates where this is the procedure. This has been my hope for the Tea Party, to unite with Conservatives and make the Republican Party a truly “Conservative” Party.


168 posted on 01/22/2012 11:45:00 AM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: JudyM; Godzilla
Judy. Judy. Judy. *sigh*

courtesy ping

169 posted on 01/22/2012 11:45:58 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Still, my biggest issue with Coulter is the venom she displayed for those Americans defending the Constitution over Obama’s eligibility.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It is for me as well. All of Coulter’s other’s positions since then have been mere confirmation that she can not be trusted.

170 posted on 01/22/2012 11:48:05 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

He is Obama 2.0.
There is NO difference between Obama and his ‘core values’ and Romney and his ‘core values’.


171 posted on 01/22/2012 11:49:54 AM PST by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nerdwithagun

I agree with you. I disagree with Ann’s support of Romney but let’s not hold her or any of our conservative pundits/commentators to higher standards than we do our candidates for office.

If conservative Republicans can forgive Gingrich for supporting Dede Scazzafava, I’m sure we can forgive Ann for supporting Romney.

If we can overlook Gingrich calling Ryan’s plan to cut spending “right wing social engineering” then we can overlook the stupid things that Ann says once in a while.


172 posted on 01/22/2012 11:50:24 AM PST by CrosscutSaw (Palin/West after brokered GOP convention in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; 230FMJ; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; ...
Another Myther, Pinetop, has been sent packing. ZOT!

To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.

173 posted on 01/22/2012 11:53:54 AM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: willk

And You point was proven by women not voting for Newt Gingrich in SC? NOT

Better read up on it.

Women are not dumb. They see a set up job by the Lamestream, Romney as everyone else that watched the debates!

They are ANGRY with this administration and Romney is a mirror image.


174 posted on 01/22/2012 11:56:16 AM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

And, I never said that any Republican doesn’t belong here.


175 posted on 01/22/2012 11:58:05 AM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: piytar; Common Sense 101
Ah heck, I responded to the wrong post.

I meant to respond to pinetop’s. Sorry, Common Sense 101. My bad!!!!

I caught that, piytar.

176 posted on 01/22/2012 12:06:27 PM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: JudyM
Well...this female South Carolinian proudly voted for Newt yesterday. Romney is far more of a leftist, toxic liar than Newt ever thought of being. To start with, Newt has NEVER been pro-abortion as Romney was in 1994!
177 posted on 01/22/2012 12:55:53 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
Well done , Viking Kitties! You gobbled up all the pathetic trolls. Y'all deserve a chuck under the chin!

Photobucket
178 posted on 01/22/2012 12:57:14 PM PST by Freedom_Fighter_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
Dang 50mm...the ZOT9000 must be overheating!

Behind the Scenes of a Zot!

179 posted on 01/22/2012 1:15:32 PM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Skeletor’s support of GOProud seemed to start the downturn.

She started slipping before that, but yeah.

180 posted on 01/22/2012 1:21:20 PM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; 230FMJ; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; ...

Delayed Action RetroZot!!

181 posted on 01/22/2012 2:00:07 PM PST by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

OMG! The Right Wing Judy Garland?

Judy must be spinning in her grave!


182 posted on 01/22/2012 2:03:47 PM PST by Palladin (Will it be a Mitt/Newt ticket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: duffee
Your mistake was to use RINO ELITIST ~ not that such critters can't exist, but they aren't relevant in what is going on today.

You recall that I have a minor campaign to make sure RINO is correctly used, so if someone was NEVER a Democrat, or never a member of a minor party (NY Conservative party, American Independent, Independence, Communist, etc.) they can't ever have been anything other than a Republican.

At the same time they might well be Leftists, or Rightists.

We have more than enough words to cover Leftists. We are short on words to cover Rightists (and this is all in the European sense since we don't really have that sort of political variation in American politics). We do not now nor have we ever had a serious ROYALIST faction! ~ for example ~

183 posted on 01/22/2012 2:41:44 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: CrosscutSaw
The Didi thing happened because the guy who'd been the Republican Congressman from that district FOREVER didn't leave behind a very active Republican campaign machine.

As I understand it Newt's recommendation was just a perfunctory "let's support the new Republican nominee for xyz"~ she was chosen by the District Committee, not in a primary. The Conservative candidate didn't run as a Republican did he?

Anyway, the Democrat won, he served one term and then he was replaced by this young Republican who thought he could peddle his body to aspiring young starlets or something ~ and advertised it on Craig's list.

No doubt Tony Wiener would have been well advised to notice what happened there.

Let us hope that district gets some party leadership who know what to do in competitive situations.

I think the screwballs in that district started all the screw-ups.

184 posted on 01/22/2012 2:50:14 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Ann’s not a Birther so she just has no feel for that complex argument. On the other hand she’s a Mittbot, and just has no feel for anything ~ she’s gotta’ be numb to sponsor Romney.


185 posted on 01/22/2012 2:53:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Correction: Ann WILL get it and I don’t mean comprehension.


186 posted on 01/22/2012 3:08:58 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

Ann Coulter has morphed into a blonde anorexic version of Peggy Noonan and both of them would be delighted if they had been born with the name ‘Megan Marshack’.

Peggy Noonan = Was always a RINO.

Ann Coulter = Went over to the dark side, now a Romney-RINO.

All the good that Ann has done with her prior exemplary writing is being undone by her insane flight from reality in backing Mitt-Witt.

cue Yoda: “a sad little thing, Coulter is”


187 posted on 01/22/2012 3:31:29 PM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"Ann’s not a Birther so she just has no feel for that complex argument."

The Article II presidential eligibility clause within our Constitution is clear and concise. So is the definition of natural born Citizen as understood by the Founders and put forth in their own writing, as well as in the Law of Nations and subsequent Supreme Court decisions.

Coulter knows Obama is NOT eligible. Her position is a calculated one.

188 posted on 01/22/2012 3:33:25 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop; 50mm; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952; Darksheare; onyx; TheOldLady; Lady Jag; Allegra; ...

189 posted on 01/22/2012 3:33:36 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Natural born citizen, of course, isn’t “clear” at all.


190 posted on 01/22/2012 3:34:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: lonestar; DarthVader; ladyvet; moovova
Have you always been a tattle-tail?

FYI to Lonestar, Ladyvet and Moovova:

The troll (Pinetop) was zotted. Kinda validates DV's ping to our esteemed Founder.

I'd suggest you three govern yourselves accordingly.
191 posted on 01/22/2012 3:36:28 PM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

It is if you look to the original intent of the Founding fathers. And that is what matters.


192 posted on 01/22/2012 3:38:25 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

An outsider who brought Socialized medicine in Massachusetts, a gun grabber and has flipped on about every issue.

No thank you!


193 posted on 01/22/2012 3:38:55 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; ladyvet; moovova; DarthVader
FYI to Lonestar, Ladyvet and Moovova: The troll (Pinetop) was zotted. Kinda validates DV's ping to our esteemed Founder. I'd suggest you three govern yourselves accordingly.

Are we in FReeper "timeout?"

FYI--Nobody, regardless of age, likes a tattle-tail.

Do you think JR and the mods need help zotting? If so, what makes you and DV think it's your advice they need?

IOW, mind your own business.

194 posted on 01/22/2012 3:47:33 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Still, what’s the point of electing a liberal? We need to start to reverse the leftist agenda, not just slow it down.


195 posted on 01/22/2012 3:48:56 PM PST by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man. Never trust anyone who hasn't been punched in the face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chesley

I understand and I agree. Let’s also be honest, it will be difficult for ANY Republican to get elected over Obama. I used to think Mickey Mouse could beat him after the last 3 years. I’m not so sure now.


196 posted on 01/22/2012 3:54:48 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
If we take a good look at what the Founding Fathers had to say about parent/child relationships there's that "natural born citizen" issue ~ which I'd always taken to mean "something other than naturalized", and then that little thing about TREASON!

Oh, yes, TREASON is the primary thing in the Constitution when it comes to what the Founders thought about the ties of parents to children.

Even in TREASON there is no attainture of blood ~ that means, the children do not inherit the penalty.

Inmany countries it is commonly the case then when your debt ridden ancestor dies the members of the family OWE HIS DEBTS.

NOT HERE!

197 posted on 01/22/2012 4:02:08 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: lonestar; ladyvet; moovova; DarthVader
FYI to Lonestar, Ladyvet and Moovova: The troll (Pinetop) was zotted. Kinda validates DV's ping to our esteemed Founder. I'd suggest you three govern yourselves accordingly.
Are we in FReeper "timeout?"


Nobody said any such thing.

FYI--Nobody, regardless of age, likes a tattle-tail.

First of all, at least get your terms right, it is tattle tale, not "tail", and it isn't "tattling" when an obvious troll is seen and brought to the attention of the mods, there are hundreds of thousands of FReepers, and the number of mods available at any given time are by my estimate, less than a dozen. Do the math.

Do you think JR and the mods need help zotting?

JR and the mods need the help of all responsible FReepers when obvious trolls, RomneyBots, PaulBots and their ilk are seen stinkin' up this conservative website.

If so, what makes you and DV think it's your advice they need?

They obviously agreed with DV, they zotted 'Pinetop'. Was that troll a friend of yours or something?

IOW, mind your own business.

Eat it babycakes, anything I see on FR IS my business, especially when it comes to the aforementioned variety of trolls, misfits and dirtbags.
198 posted on 01/22/2012 4:06:26 PM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Actually they can and we have them in Southern states as well as nationally. There are many that are either are un-principled or have socialist or democrat or just a tendency to spend, many of these don’t have the courage to run as what they are and they will run and many times get elected as Republicans but don’t vote as a Republican ( RINO ). Many of these congregate in some areas and basically control the party to the exclusion of Conservatives (ELITEST). English is a wonderful language, industry, admen scientist, and journalist can create new words overnight, individuals can use words in ways that they were not previously used or intended and still communicate. It was not my mistake to use the term “Rino Elitest”, it conveyed what I meant to say and I seriously doubt anyone misunderstood me including you. We have too much crap going on to spend any more time on this.


199 posted on 01/22/2012 4:09:12 PM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: duffee
Your use of the term obfuscated whatever it was you imagined you'd like to say.

Spit it out ~ make yourself clear.

200 posted on 01/22/2012 4:12:11 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson