Skip to comments.Ann Coulter Throws a Temper Tantrum (BARF ALERT)
Posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:03 AM PST by stratboy
Ann Coulter was just on Fox and Friends. She was crying over the fact that Romney got decimated in South Carolina. She offered a few talking points from the Romney camp including:
1. Newt is the lease conservative of all Candidates running. 2. Newt is unelectable because of his failed marriages. 3. The Freddy Mac non-issue. 4. John K asked a legitimate question and he is a completely fair and honorable reporter. 5. South Carolina is going back to it democratic roots and backing someone who calls Obama a socialist.
She laid out the establishment talking point that everyone who voted for McCain, will vote for Romney, that we need to get the independents.
I never thought I’d agree with you on anything.
Thank you for your concern, JudyM. We're still not going to vote for Myth. ZOT!
To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.
Ann is awesome period. I do not think shes in LOVE with Romney neither am I. He, in her opinion, (one I share), is that Romney is merely the most electable. Newt IS NOT the conservative we need.
Hmmmm! Why did I just have an urge to spit?
I’m calling this one bullcrap.
And I’m a girl.
Oh, that’s good. Very, very good.
Just in case you missed the last debate, I suggest you listen to Newt take on / down John King and the SRM. He took that first question and hit a home run with his answer. He has the spine we need to take on 0 bummer. IBTZ!
“She recently said Romney is the most conservative candidate in the race, and that was before Perry dropped out.”
In the race, yes, but not conservative overall. Remember, Ann begged the NJ gov. to jump in.
Interesting. I missed that. Link?
Get her flat on her back and give her a snack!
It looks like Coulter is coming out with a new book, “How to Talk to a CONSERVATIVE (If You Must)”.
To think I used to respect that harpy. I/we didn’t change. It did.
Can I get some lightning here?
Ah heck, I responded to the wrong post. I meant to respond to pinetop’s.
Sorry, Common Sense 101. My bad!!!!
I have not missed an election, primary, or runoff election since I turned 21 and first voted in the Tennesse 1964 primary election and I’ve NEVER voted for a democrat or in a democrat primary, donated to and worked for many candidates who I did not totally agree with, especially presidential candidates. I know the beginnings of and history of the Republican Party and they have for many years been “the party of fiscal responsibility,” only not in practise. The “Conservative” element of the party more often than not has to hold their nose to vote election day, the country can’t afford the disaster this time that occured four years ago. In the late sixties the leaders of the Republican party would describe the democrats as “the loyal opposition” and would go on to say “We have the same goals, just a different way of arriving at them” this was and is BS. This is the same group that got rid of Newt and if you look at his accomplishments and at the reduced spending during his tenure and the spending spree that started when the successflly deposed him. This is the same group yhat is opposing him today. I choose to refer to them as Rino Elitest at times even though I send them money and help them win elections out of what I see as no viable altertanative at times. Rino Elitest is actually not as bad as some things those of my ilk get called by democrats, media and RINOS. I have refrained from using tha name for years but I’m sick and tired of the only alternative to the democrat party being controlled by a minority and go about destroying Conservative Republicans. Forty percent of Americans describe themselves and we are allowing a minority to control the Republican party and set the rules for primaries and the convention to favor the “establishment” Republicans, if you like that better than “RINO ELITEST”, Conservatives in all states need to find out how to participate in their precient caucus, take their beighbors get conservatives elected to the county and state conventions and or run for party office or for delegates where this is the procedure. This has been my hope for the Tea Party, to unite with Conservatives and make the Republican Party a truly “Conservative” Party.
It is for me as well. All of Coulter’s other’s positions since then have been mere confirmation that she can not be trusted.
He is Obama 2.0.
There is NO difference between Obama and his ‘core values’ and Romney and his ‘core values’.
I agree with you. I disagree with Ann’s support of Romney but let’s not hold her or any of our conservative pundits/commentators to higher standards than we do our candidates for office.
If conservative Republicans can forgive Gingrich for supporting Dede Scazzafava, I’m sure we can forgive Ann for supporting Romney.
If we can overlook Gingrich calling Ryan’s plan to cut spending “right wing social engineering” then we can overlook the stupid things that Ann says once in a while.
To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.
And You point was proven by women not voting for Newt Gingrich in SC? NOT
Better read up on it.
Women are not dumb. They see a set up job by the Lamestream, Romney as everyone else that watched the debates!
They are ANGRY with this administration and Romney is a mirror image.
And, I never said that any Republican doesn’t belong here.
I meant to respond to pinetops. Sorry, Common Sense 101. My bad!!!!
I caught that, piytar.
OMG! The Right Wing Judy Garland?
Judy must be spinning in her grave!
You recall that I have a minor campaign to make sure RINO is correctly used, so if someone was NEVER a Democrat, or never a member of a minor party (NY Conservative party, American Independent, Independence, Communist, etc.) they can't ever have been anything other than a Republican.
At the same time they might well be Leftists, or Rightists.
We have more than enough words to cover Leftists. We are short on words to cover Rightists (and this is all in the European sense since we don't really have that sort of political variation in American politics). We do not now nor have we ever had a serious ROYALIST faction! ~ for example ~
As I understand it Newt's recommendation was just a perfunctory "let's support the new Republican nominee for xyz"~ she was chosen by the District Committee, not in a primary. The Conservative candidate didn't run as a Republican did he?
Anyway, the Democrat won, he served one term and then he was replaced by this young Republican who thought he could peddle his body to aspiring young starlets or something ~ and advertised it on Craig's list.
No doubt Tony Wiener would have been well advised to notice what happened there.
Let us hope that district gets some party leadership who know what to do in competitive situations.
I think the screwballs in that district started all the screw-ups.
Ann’s not a Birther so she just has no feel for that complex argument. On the other hand she’s a Mittbot, and just has no feel for anything ~ she’s gotta’ be numb to sponsor Romney.
Correction: Ann WILL get it and I don’t mean comprehension.
Ann Coulter has morphed into a blonde anorexic version of Peggy Noonan and both of them would be delighted if they had been born with the name ‘Megan Marshack’.
Peggy Noonan = Was always a RINO.
Ann Coulter = Went over to the dark side, now a Romney-RINO.
All the good that Ann has done with her prior exemplary writing is being undone by her insane flight from reality in backing Mitt-Witt.
cue Yoda: “a sad little thing, Coulter is”
The Article II presidential eligibility clause within our Constitution is clear and concise. So is the definition of natural born Citizen as understood by the Founders and put forth in their own writing, as well as in the Law of Nations and subsequent Supreme Court decisions.
Coulter knows Obama is NOT eligible. Her position is a calculated one.
Natural born citizen, of course, isn’t “clear” at all.
It is if you look to the original intent of the Founding fathers. And that is what matters.
An outsider who brought Socialized medicine in Massachusetts, a gun grabber and has flipped on about every issue.
No thank you!
Are we in FReeper "timeout?"
FYI--Nobody, regardless of age, likes a tattle-tail.
Do you think JR and the mods need help zotting? If so, what makes you and DV think it's your advice they need?
IOW, mind your own business.
Still, what’s the point of electing a liberal? We need to start to reverse the leftist agenda, not just slow it down.
I understand and I agree. Let’s also be honest, it will be difficult for ANY Republican to get elected over Obama. I used to think Mickey Mouse could beat him after the last 3 years. I’m not so sure now.
Oh, yes, TREASON is the primary thing in the Constitution when it comes to what the Founders thought about the ties of parents to children.
Even in TREASON there is no attainture of blood ~ that means, the children do not inherit the penalty.
Inmany countries it is commonly the case then when your debt ridden ancestor dies the members of the family OWE HIS DEBTS.
Actually they can and we have them in Southern states as well as nationally. There are many that are either are un-principled or have socialist or democrat or just a tendency to spend, many of these don’t have the courage to run as what they are and they will run and many times get elected as Republicans but don’t vote as a Republican ( RINO ). Many of these congregate in some areas and basically control the party to the exclusion of Conservatives (ELITEST). English is a wonderful language, industry, admen scientist, and journalist can create new words overnight, individuals can use words in ways that they were not previously used or intended and still communicate. It was not my mistake to use the term “Rino Elitest”, it conveyed what I meant to say and I seriously doubt anyone misunderstood me including you. We have too much crap going on to spend any more time on this.
Spit it out ~ make yourself clear.