Ann Coulter Throws a Temper Tantrum (BARF ALERT)

Fox News | 01/22/2012 | Me

[stratboy]

Ann Coulter was just on Fox and Friends. She was crying over the fact that Romney got decimated in South Carolina. She offered a few talking points from the Romney camp including:

1. Newt is the lease conservative of all Candidates running. 2. Newt is unelectable because of his failed marriages. 3. The Freddy Mac non-issue. 4. John K asked a legitimate question and he is a completely fair and honorable reporter. 5. South Carolina is going back to it democratic roots and backing someone who calls Obama a socialist.

She laid out the establishment talking point that everyone who voted for McCain, will vote for Romney, that we need to get the independents.

[mkjessup]

mkjessup
Just to set the record straight...my vote is going to Newt. I don’t like Romney, Ann Coulter, trolls or crybabies such as yourself. For all the tears, you must be an “only” child.

In that case, lil moo moo, that begs the question as to why you chose to align yourself with troll defenders who took offense to DV alerting the mods to the dearly departed 'Pinetop'.

My suggestion? Snug up your diaper tightly before running off across the playground to report someone to the teacher.

Your puerile 'suggestion' has been forwarded to DarthVader who is no doubt keeping notes on all of you losers.

[Nathaniel]

OK. You’re entitled. Just get over yourself.

[bluerose]

Ann is on the Mike Gallagher show right now. First she said it’s the end of the world meaning Newt’s win, then she compares Christie to Reagan. She needs to take her shrill skinny ass and stfu especially when she herself blasted Romney last time around.
What about Romneycare Ann?

We need to stick together right now and attack Obama.

[Nathaniel]

I agree. King is liberal scum. However, Newt is a Pelosi pal. I did not say that I didn’t admire the way King got his a** handed to him - and justifyably so. What I’m saying is that Romney is enough of a RINO that the dims are more comdortable with him. Having said that, I will vote for ANYBODY to get rid of the Muslim in chief, including Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer.

[Nathaniel]

I agree. King is liberal scum. However, Newt is a Pelosi pal. I did not say that I didn’t admire the way King got his a** handed to him - and justifyably so. What I’m saying is that Romney is enough of a RINO that the dims are more comfortable with him. Having said that, I will vote for ANYBODY to get rid of the Muslim in chief, including Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer.

[ladyvet]

First of all nobody was defending anyone. Your feeling seem to be hurt because what we did do was make fun of you because you ARE a tattle tale,LOL!

Your puerile 'suggestion' has been forwarded to DarthVader who is no doubt keeping notes on all of you losers.

All kidding aside Sport... this is kind of creepy.

[mkjessup]

Oh we’ll attack 0bama, believe that but first we need to attack and utterly destroy Romney and eliminate that dirtbag from any possibility of becoming the GOP nomineee. To do that, we need to rally around Newt who is the only candidate with the intelligence, cajones and skill to torpedo the Mitt-Witt.

[Nathaniel]

I do not NEED to and will NOT “get back to me [you]”. I dislike Romney intensely. As much as I have differences with the Mormons, conservatives will play directly into the lib-dims’ hands if religion is made THE issue here. Having said that, ANYBODY but B. HUSSEIN Obammay.

[mkjessup]

First of all nobody was defending anyone.

Of course you were. You were defending the dead troll 'Pinetop' by your attacking Darth Vader as the "tattle tale", I pointed out that the zotting of Pinetop validated DV's going to the mods, and you didn't like that. That looks like a case of projection in that YOUR "feelings were hurt"

Your feeling seem to be hurt because what we did do was make fun of you because you ARE a tattle tale,LOL!

You can't even keep track of your lies. I never went to the mods in this thread, DV did and rightly so.

Your puerile 'suggestion' has been forwarded to DarthVader who is no doubt keeping notes on all of you losers.
All kidding aside Sport... this is kind of creepy.

The scent of ozone in the air can make you feel that way.

[moovova]

...keeping notes...

Go away, freak.

[mkjessup]

Shove it punk.

[ladyvet]

To: ladyvet; DarthVader; 50mm; darkwing104

Look! Your tattling again! LOL!

[mkjessup]

I’ll ping anyone I please, and you got nothing to say about it. You’re no lady, that’s for sure.

[ladyvet]

LOL! See ya skipper. This is just getting too weird for me.

[mkjessup]

You’re just zot-bait that hasn’t ripened yet. Adios babycakes.

[Marcella]

book mark

[muawiyah]

Yes, Mitt is not running on this site.

You were, unfortunately, easily misled into discussing how he might win.

Frankly, the guy is unelectable. Discussion of his virtues, if any, should be deferred to the time when he might become electable.

[TheOldLady]

Jim has principled, well-thought-out reasons for not supporting Romney and for not allowing his trolls to come here and campaign for him.

Romney's record is one that is virtually indistinguishable from a radical leftist democrat's. He is pro abortion, pro homosexual, and anti gun, to name just a few problems with his actions. His Romneycare provided the Obama administration with a template for Obamacare, the unconstitutional socialized medicine scheme designed to break the back of our healthcare system.

He talks the talk, but after he's elected, he walks hard left and "forgets" all his campaign rhetoric. Speaking plainly, he's a filthy liar, and to be trusted at about the same level as Obama, who is incapable of telling the truth about anything, ever.

Anyone who blatantly pimps for Romney will lose his posting privileges (get zotted), for why, with his record, would anyone but a leftist want him to be the president?

I hope that helps.

[Rate_Determining_Step]

I don’t know how to respond further. Should I just shut up and stay in my place?

You have all but stated that you cannot be convinced that your position isn’t the right one.

Tell me, if (IF) Romney got the nomination, would you vote for him?

They could dig up Mark Hatfield if he won the nomination, I’d crawl over broken glass to vote for him or ANYBODY. If that’s what it took to rid ourselves of Obama.

Clearly, with both men, there are many issues which have been “changed”, “clarified” and basically flip-flopped over the years. They are both (usually) saying the right things now.

However, who transgressed under little or no pressure? Remember, Gingrich came from a longstanding Red State and Romney from a Blue. He was under no pressure what-so-ever to “temper” his views. They just came from his fertile mind. As well, they’re more recent.

So how can we judge a man? What other character attributes can one draw on? For me, it’s his marriage vows which are the most apparent. Is there a better indicator of one’s integrity? I can’t think of one.

With that in mind, my choice was easy. Even though I’d love to see Newt pinch hit in one (ok all) debates with Obama.

On a range of important issues (2nd am, life, immigration, etc.) one WILL BE the #1 issue regardless of what I or anybody else cares about. The economy. We’re at a Europe-level tipping point here. And News loses those credentials flat. He shows as much deference to capitalism as your average democrat - “Vulture Capitalism” (Really!?)

With that kind of mindset, if he wins the nomination, the argument will between two experts who distrust the American people to freely conduct business with each other.

The socialism vs liberty clash is the battle that comes over the hill at dawn. That battle MUST be won.

[Rate_Determining_Step]

Would you call this http://thehill.com/video/campaign/203497-romney-likens-work-at-bain-to-obamas-auto-industry-bailout the proper defense of capitalism????????

No, I don't. It was clearly a poorly thought out attempt to explain his cost cutting activities at Bain.

It looks like you're equating their positions on capitalism. Would I be correct?