Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

League defends decision not to review Evans non-catch (Ravens Robbed)
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/category/rumor-mill/ ^

Posted on 01/22/2012 6:13:37 PM PST by 11th_VA

Posted by Mike Florio on January 22, 2012, 7:47 PM EST

Reuters Shortly before Ravens kicker Billy Cundiff did his best Gary Anderson impersonation (to the chagrin of Matt Birk), Ravens receiver Lee Evans had the ball in his hands, in the end zone. But Patriots defensive back Sterling Moore knocked the ball out of Evans’ hands, and the ruling on the field was that the would-be touchdown pass was incomplete.

Though it wasn’t a scoring play, fewer than two minutes remained in the game. Thus, the decision (or not) to review the play was to be initiated by the replay assistant in the booth. Even though the slow-motion angle shown by CBS seemed to suggest that it may have been a catch, the replay assistant didn’t instruct referee Alberto Riveron to take a look via the on-field portable TV on wheels.

As to whether a catch was made, the standard is simple. From Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 3: “If a player controls the ball while in the end zone, both feet, or any part of his body other than his hands, must be completely on the ground before losing control, or the pass is incomplete.”

There’s no Calvin Johnson component. No requirement of a football move. Possession plus two feet down equals a catch, and a touchdown.

(Excerpt) Read more at profootballtalk.nbcsports.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: chat; sourcetitlenoturl; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: 11th_VA

They oughta take the case to court. Let the courts decide.


21 posted on 01/22/2012 6:30:26 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Wow. What a crazy ending. Great game. Baltimore almost beat the heavily favored Patriots (and maybe actually did beat them but for a bad ref call).


22 posted on 01/22/2012 6:30:35 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Until recently it would have been a TD, no brainer. But they have this odd rule now that for a completion you have to "complete the football play" or some such gobbledygook. And despite that other rule, yes it holds for scoring plays as well.

You are right. The NFL rules are almost retarded. They let you score on a run if you hypothetically break some molecule of a "plane" with the nose of the football for a milli second. Meanwhile, on a thrown ball, you have to damned near take three steps. Very inconsistent and stupid set of rules that only make things more difficult and controversial than they should be. Shame on the NFL for this self inflicted difficulty.

23 posted on 01/22/2012 6:30:36 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

I played it back in slo-mo on my DVR. He did not hold the ball for two steps. the ball was loose just before the second foot landed.

It was a good call.......and I wanted the Ravens to win.


24 posted on 01/22/2012 6:31:24 PM PST by Loud Mime (When conceit and anger are part of your religion, it's a political movement, not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Could the Ravens coach have initiate a challenge?

No - less than 1 minute left in game

25 posted on 01/22/2012 6:33:10 PM PST by 11th_VA (Keep your laws OFF my light bulbs !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
After watching it about a dozen times..... The receiver did not have his second foot down before the ball was knocked out
26 posted on 01/22/2012 6:33:45 PM PST by Popman (Obama is God's curse upon the land....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Reminds me of the Redskins from the ‘70s when Mel Grey(?) bobbled the ball in the end zone. I don’t remember if it was a catch or not but it was a blown call.


27 posted on 01/22/2012 6:34:37 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
The comments from the league (at the link) are correct:
The league disagrees. “The ruling on the field of an incomplete pass was confirmed by the Instant Replay assistant, correctly, and as a result, there was no need to stop the game,” the league said in a statement forwarded to PFT by spokesman Michael Signora. “The receiver did not get his second foot down in the end zone with possession, and as a result, it was an incomplete pass.”

Former V.P. of officiating and current FOX rules analyst Mike Pereira expressed a similar sentiment via text message to PFT. “Clearly not a catch,” Pereira said. “Ball coming out before second foot clearly down. . . . No need to review it because it was clearly incomplete.”

At most, they could have asked for a review, but there was nothing there to justify overturning the on-field call.

Just filling some sports page space.

28 posted on 01/22/2012 6:34:55 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I think there is some poetic justice here. I was rather exasperated watching the Ravens beat the Texans last week with zero penalties called against them.

I think the NFL is becoming more and more like pro wrestling where viewing audiences must suspend certain rational beliefs about how penalties and non-calls influence the outcomes so decisively.

I have for 5 years been an increasingly bitter Cowboys fan. I long noticed the increasing of penalties called against the Cowboys since their dynasty years in the 1990s. I reviewed some data this year looking not just at how often they were called but how often their opponents are called.

For some strange reason, teams commit far fewer penalties when they place Dallas.

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-penalties-per-game?date=2011-02-07

It would not be hard to create differentials between team/opponent penalty calls. Figure out who has the highest differentials. The refs are definitely shaping the outcomes of these games in my opinion.


29 posted on 01/22/2012 6:35:14 PM PST by lonestar67 (I remember when unemployment was 4.7 percent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

>>I’m not a big Ravens fan, but holy crap - this play was a TD. <<

I am not going to say “not even close” but it was clear that the ball was stripped before both feet were set AND control was established.

The replay will be replayed only about a bazillion times (remember the “music city miracle?)”


30 posted on 01/22/2012 6:35:52 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Spoiler Alert! The secret to Terra Nova: THEY ARE ALL DEAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

It should’ve been reviewed but not overturned. The slo mo seems to show him losing control before second foot comes down. Evans seemed to agree with the call. Good call ref.


31 posted on 01/22/2012 6:36:46 PM PST by bramps (Once a muslim always a muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

The first picture show the Indian out at first base against the Tigers but the ump called him safe ruining the pitcher’s perfect game. The next day, that ump was behind the plate so the Tigers sent out that same pither with the lineup card before the game. The umpire was extending his hand in a show of apology. He was torn up by his missing the call and the young pitcher was gracious in accepting his apology.


32 posted on 01/22/2012 6:39:09 PM PST by Typelouder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Um no. Absolutely not a TD. Receiver has to retain possession while making a football move. He did not. Sorry. Go cry in your beer.


33 posted on 01/22/2012 6:40:55 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

You couldn’t keep either your team or your coach in Ohio. What’s wrong out there anyway?


34 posted on 01/22/2012 6:40:55 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (I'm not cut out to suffer fools like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
Losers Rule Number One; When you lose, blame the refs.

Seems like from time of the 2002 "Snow Job" that the zeebs are deciding more and more games.

35 posted on 01/22/2012 6:42:45 PM PST by Mike Darancette (11/06/2012: Starts "Occupy the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

Panem et circenses.


36 posted on 01/22/2012 6:43:10 PM PST by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

If the rule really is 2 feet on the ground with control of the ball, it was clearly a touchdown.

I always thought you had to prove that you could make a “football move”, so if the ball fell out when you hit the ground they’d call it incomplete. I also thought though that once you had the ball in the end zone, once you had it in control it couldn’t be “knocked out”, since you already scored the touchdown at that point.

I was surprised they didn’t review the play at least. Even if they upheld the call, you’d feel they at least had taken a look.


37 posted on 01/22/2012 6:43:29 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Correct. No TD.


38 posted on 01/22/2012 6:44:18 PM PST by NotSoFreeStater (If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Ravens team is full of thugs and that murderer Lewis. Can’t see how anyone could want them to win anything.


39 posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:00 PM PST by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Who is this Wexler?


40 posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:07 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (I'm not cut out to suffer fools like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson