Skip to comments.Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons
Posted on 01/23/2012 10:09:17 AM PST by Sopater
click here to read article
You wanna fulfill your dreams?
Don’t have unprotected sex!
Don’t have sex at all if you are a teenager!
Just watch ‘Maury’.
I’ve always found abortion to abhorrent, but somehow I wonder why Stanley didn’t have one ...
Exactly. And more likely to be dependent on the government for everything, i.e., Democratic voters.
Because abortion was still illegal then. BHO should be celebrating that Roe v. Wade didn’t get handed down in 1960.
To "celebrate" this most evil and hideous SC ruling is nothing short of pure evil.
I'll help him out - I loathe him too!
...continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.
Well, taken to its logical conclusion, does this mean Obama wants to also help the biological father of the fetus to force an abortion as child support might keep the sperm donor from buying those hot new Jordan Reeboks? Either way it is termination of an unborn life and should not be done for selfish or immoral reasons.
What 0 is alluding to is the view that males are never burdened by a pregnancy when it comes to pursuing a career or lifestyle. Abortion gives females the same so called freedom.
Our sons don’t have any right (yet) to kill their children.
If our daughters are not responsible enough to keep from getting pregnant and instead opt for murder, they have not deserved a chance.
Like faggots and dykes interference, you mean?
Like forcing me to pay for someone else's lifestyle choices, such as baby-killing, drug-using, education for illegals, where it takes food off MY table from MY family, so you can buy votes?
How about vote fraud, that affects MY family because my vote is offset by an illegal one, and I can't thereby vote for MY FAMILY's best interest, because YOU want to dictate our lives?
Really? So Obama has issued another executive order making it legal for men to kill their children?
continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams
Huh? I realize abortions are most popular amongst the upwardly mobile young woman. However, what do rights, freedom, and opportunity have to do with it? Women are perfectly free to not get pregnant, except in the limited case of rape. If they are less free than men, and they are, that is a matter of nature, not law.
Nevermind the appropriateness of counteracting nature to equalize the sexes, and nevermind the relevance of any of this to rights and the constitution. I don’t care how far they go; I don’t even care if we live in the Brave New World. Women will never be as free as men in matters of the womb and the heart. Abortion helps them better to use, women, when you get right down to it. Joke’s on you, feminists.
Why not affirm in law a father's natural right to prevent the abortion of his pre-born baby daughter or son in the first place?
Why not have the father simply raise his own child, with the full legal right to do so?
Referring to fathers as “donors” is pure misandry, and demeans biological fatherhood.
Demeaning biological fatherhood empowers the de facto parthenogenesis ideology of feminism...that the baby is the woman’s only...and thus is pro-abortion.
Only when Roe vs. Wade is overturned and abortion is banned will sons have the same chance as daughters to have their children protected from death by abortion.
No, he means to walk away from the consequences for their behavioral choices. Liberalism is all about making others pay for the consequences of your behavior.
Pure sophistry (ie, bovine excrement).
How about families' choices of education? How about families' choices of discipline? Religious upbringing? Protecting them from pornography? Teaching them the Christian view of homosexuality? Do you support the UN Rights of the Child Treaty, Obama?
How about not intruding if a family wants to buy raw milk?
No, you DO believe in deep government involvement in private family matters, and are using this false argument to justify this penultimate transfer of responsibility to the most innocent being imaginable.