Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons
CNS News ^ | January 23, 2012 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 01/23/2012 10:09:17 AM PST by Sopater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-65 last
To: Sopater

If our daughters are not responsible enough to keep from getting pregnant and instead opt for murder, they have not deserved a chance.


51 posted on 01/23/2012 11:58:47 AM PST by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
"government should not intrude on private family matters"

Like faggots and dykes interference, you mean?

Like forcing me to pay for someone else's lifestyle choices, such as baby-killing, drug-using, education for illegals, where it takes food off MY table from MY family, so you can buy votes?

How about vote fraud, that affects MY family because my vote is offset by an illegal one, and I can't thereby vote for MY FAMILY's best interest, because YOU want to dictate our lives?

52 posted on 01/23/2012 12:13:51 PM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons

Really? So Obama has issued another executive order making it legal for men to kill their children?

53 posted on 01/23/2012 12:31:57 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams”

Huh? I realize abortions are most popular amongst the upwardly mobile young woman. However, what do rights, freedom, and opportunity have to do with it? Women are perfectly free to not get pregnant, except in the limited case of rape. If they are less free than men, and they are, that is a matter of nature, not law.

Nevermind the appropriateness of counteracting nature to equalize the sexes, and nevermind the relevance of any of this to rights and the constitution. I don’t care how far they go; I don’t even care if we live in the Brave New World. Women will never be as free as men in matters of the womb and the heart. Abortion helps them better to use, women, when you get right down to it. Joke’s on you, feminists.


54 posted on 01/23/2012 12:43:43 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
why not add a "DNA rider", to determine paternity, and have the fathers held responsible for the COST of raising a child, AND, for the cost of killing his child in the womb?

Why not affirm in law a father's natural right to prevent the abortion of his pre-born baby daughter or son in the first place?

Why not have the father simply raise his own child, with the full legal right to do so?

55 posted on 01/23/2012 12:56:04 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

Referring to fathers as “donors” is pure misandry, and demeans biological fatherhood.

Demeaning biological fatherhood empowers the de facto parthenogenesis ideology of feminism...that the baby is the woman’s only...and thus is pro-abortion.


56 posted on 01/23/2012 1:02:04 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Only when Roe vs. Wade is overturned and abortion is banned will sons have the same chance as daughters to have their children protected from death by abortion.


57 posted on 01/23/2012 1:07:17 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons
...to be ABORTED?

No, he means to walk away from the consequences for their behavioral choices. Liberalism is all about making others pay for the consequences of your behavior.

58 posted on 01/23/2012 1:11:17 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
affirms a broader principle: that government should not intrude on private family matters

Pure sophistry (ie, bovine excrement).

How about families' choices of education? How about families' choices of discipline? Religious upbringing? Protecting them from pornography? Teaching them the Christian view of homosexuality? Do you support the UN Rights of the Child Treaty, Obama?

How about not intruding if a family wants to buy raw milk?

No, you DO believe in deep government involvement in private family matters, and are using this false argument to justify this penultimate transfer of responsibility to the most innocent being imaginable.

59 posted on 01/23/2012 1:18:05 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click the red pepper!

Don’t Veg Out
Become a Hero, Donate Monthly


Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up

60 posted on 01/23/2012 1:46:44 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater
As musch as I am against abortion, I really wish his mother had made that choice.
61 posted on 01/23/2012 2:20:24 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

musch = much


62 posted on 01/23/2012 2:21:36 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

That is an amazing graphic. I’d like to post it on my FB page... do you know how I can do that?


63 posted on 01/23/2012 6:36:08 PM PST by luckymom (The Son of God became a man that men might become sons of God. -C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: luckymom

Yes, it is. You could right click my image to download it to your photo program and upload it from there. Or you could right click my image to get the image source for a link from your FB status.

I think those would be easiest.


64 posted on 01/23/2012 7:17:34 PM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Thanks! I’m going to do that.


65 posted on 01/23/2012 7:38:02 PM PST by luckymom (The Son of God became a man that men might become sons of God. -C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson