Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP Establishment in Abject Panic: They Don't Understand Their Own Base (Rush Limbaugh)
The Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | 1/23/2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/23/2012 12:50:08 PM PST by Yossarian

The GOP Establishment in Abject Panic: They Don't Understand Their Own Base
January 23, 2012


RUSH: Folks, the Republican establishment is in a full-blown panic. And I -- and I'm not doing an I-told-you-so. This is a giant I-told-you-so. This is a reminder that I will illustrate. I told you this in almost the exact words you heard on television from Republican consultants and establishment people. I told you this was their fear back on November 10th of last year. They are in an out roar, a panic. They are secretly trying to get Mitch Daniels to get back in the race. There are entreaties being made to Bobby Jindal to get in the race. They are panicked. They are scared to death they're going to lose the House and not win the Senate, and I told you on November 10th that's their primary concern. That's why they were apoplectic at Christine O'Donnell and Sharron Angle getting Tea Party nominations.

It's about the Senate. It's about being in charge of the money. It's not about cutting spending. The Republican establishment is not signed on to the cutting spending business. People ask me, "What do you mean, who is this Republican establishment?" Two things. They don't like conservatives and they're not really all that concerned about spending. They want to be in charge of it. That's who they are. And they are not gonna be in charge of it if they don't hold the House and if they don't pick up the Senate. And that's what they really want. They're not and never have been convinced that Obama can be beat.

Now, Newt has thrown this thing into a tizzy. They don't know what to do. They wanted this wrapped up. They don't understand why it happened. They're blaming all the wrong people. They're blaming their own voters. They're blaming the media. They're blaming stupidity on the part of the voters. They haven't the slightest idea why this happened in South Carolina. It's not too much democracy going on in their minds; they just don't understand it. They don't understand the base of their own party. They resent the base of their own party. They don't understand the passion. I was telling Snerdley this morning, 'cause he came in here, gave me his theory, which I promptly shot down. His theory is that we all owe ABC this, 'cause if it weren't for ABC and John King asking the questions, Newt woulda never been -- and to a certain extent, that's true. But why?

Why did those questions tee Newt up, and why did Newt know what to do with them? Very simple. I've been doing this show for 23 years, and one of my themes from the beginning, from 1988, has been that the American conservative middle class are the ones playing by the rules. They are the ones that obey the law to the best of their ability. They raise their kids. They try to shield their kids from cultural rot and depravity. They try to keep them off drugs. They try to get them into college. They follow as best they can all the rules and they're laughed at and made fun of and they are impugned everywhere they look. They go to the movies, they're mocked and made fun of. They turn on the radio, listen to music, they're laughed at, mocked, and made fun of. They turn on television, watch an average television show, they are laughed at, mocked and made fun of. They open the newspaper, same thing. They've had it. They've been dealing with this for over 20 years, and nobody's fought back for 'em. Not one person ever has fought back for 'em.

The last time somebody actually spoke up in this large a forum, a presidential forum, would have to be Reagan; and Reagan did it not so much by what he said (although he had his moments). He did it by winning. He did it by skunking these people! Since then, the Republican leadership has not seemed focused so much on winning and they sit there and they take it. Whenever their own voters are insulted -- when their own voters are laughed at and impugned and called racists, sexist, bigot homophobes -- the Republicans don't defend them nor themselves because they're scared to death the independents are gonna be upset, or the media is gonna be upset.

So the base of the Republican Party, the voters, have been bottling up for 25 years, a resentment -- an anger, if you will -- that their own party won't fight for them, won't fight for itself, won't fight for what's right. So when Newt gets teed up with these questions from Juan Williams and John King and whoever else and simply says what they've been thinking for 25 years, they say, "Finally!" What they want right now is fight-back, what they want is push-back, what they want is kick-back, what they want is smack-down! What they want is for these people who have been laughing at them and mocking them and impugning them, put in their place.

They're tired of the cultural rot taking place in the country. They're tired of the incessant growth of government and spending. They're tired of it, and they're frustrated as they can be that members of their own party who get elected can't seem to articulate their own passions. Politics is about passion, and the Republican Party doesn't seem to have it! There's always fear of somebody. Fear of the media, fear of Democrats. Well, Newt doesn't act like he's got any fear. So how many wives does he got? "I don't care!" What did he do for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac? "I don't care." What are his national disapproval ratings?

"I don't care! Finally somebody's telling the bad guys who they are, what to do and that we're not gonna take it anymore -- or that we don't want to take it anymore." Now, you can sit there and you can say that that's cockeyed, that elections aren't won that way. Uhhhh, they aren't? Who just won? Who's already leading in the polls in Florida? George Will had a fascinating statistic over the weekend. Mitt Romney -- Mr. Electability, according to the Republican establishment; Mr. The Only Guy That Can Give Us the Senate -- is 9-and-16 in his election career. He's won nine and lost 16. He's nine out of 25. That, they tell us, is Mr. Electability -- and they're sitting around, the base is, and they're saying, "We don't care about this traditional stuff that you care about that's kept you in second place all these years."

It really isn't complicated. But the resentment for the base that the Republican establishment has is obvious, and of course the Republican establishment knows that. They know that the Tea Party is not embraced, that the Republican establishment's trying to marginalize the Tea Party. So really, at least for me, is not hard to understand. Now, there's an abject sense of panic that has set in over, "Oh, no! You mean this race is gonna go on? Oh, no!" Yeah. The race is gonna go on. See, they thought that this would be over before it started. Remember what I told you: They're gonna split the conservative vote and elect the moderate. They were gonna stand traditional theory on its head.

The traditional theory is: In the primaries, you play to your base, you win the nomination; then when you win the nomination and go to the general, that's when you go push moderates like McCain does -- and you lose. They decided, "We're gonna lose from the get-go. We're gonna nominate a moderate. We're gonna take conservatives in our party that we can't stand and we're gonna have as many of them up there as possible splitting vote," in this case splitting the polls, because there weren't any votes until January. But they were hoping the polls would end this race before a vote had been cast. So they welcomed Perry getting in and Ron Paul and Herman Cain and all these people, because it allowed them the opportunity to ridicule them.

I'm talking about our own establishment. Forget the media and Democrats. I'm not even talking about them yet. (We'll get to them in due course.) So the more conservatives the better. The more you can criticize 'em, impugn 'em, but the more important thing is you split the support. Romney versus all the others; Romney by default wins. They were hoping to create psychological attitude that said, "You know what? There's no way. 'Cause if all these guys stay in, Mitt's it. The conservative vote's gonna split itself when the votes finally start being counted and blah, blah, blah." Now look at what happened when you actually start voting! This is why they wanted to make sure the vote didn't count. They wanted it over before this.

Now, if you happened to watch cable TV on Saturday night -- if you have as boring a life as I do and you were watching cable TV on Saturday night (laughing) -- what did you hear? You heard the same pundits. I don't care what network you went to. You heard the same pundits lamenting the same things, worried about the same things (primarily their predictions being wrong), talking about how, "This can't go on. The longer this goes on the worse it is for the Republican Party," and I'm sitting there saying, "What's so bad about this?" There was total shock. Why was there shock? The polling data before South Carolina told us what was gonna happen.

The shock was that Newt won the women vote, he won the independent vote, he won every congressional strict in South Carolina. That was the shock. Everything that they told us Newt couldn't do, he did. Everything they told us a conservative couldn't do, he did. Every bit of conventional wisdom was stood on its head. Every bit of "electability" conventional wisdom from the so-called experts was stood on its head Saturday night, and so pundits and the analysts and the consultants are trying to analyze it and figure it out -- and the best they can come up with is, "We've gotta put a stop to this! If this goes go on, it's gonna kill the Republican Party. Oh, no."

I'm watching this and I say, "Wait a minute. Do you people understand yet you can't control this? You gave it your best shot; you can't control this. In fact, you may be affecting this in ways it wouldn't be happening just by the way you're handling yourselves." I'm talking about media. My question is -- and, look, I'm getting my shared of panicked e-mails, too. Oh, and I'll tell you something else I'm getting. I'm getting e-mails with my own words (not attributed to me) sent to me. That's one of the reasons I'm gonna go back to November 10th and remind you when all this was first predicted. "Rush, there's panic out there! Newt? We're gonna lose the Senate if it's Newt."

"Oh, yeah, really? Yeah? Where did you hear that?"

Now, ladies and gentlemen, for me, a protracted primary that goes on to the convention? Bring it on! The fact that conservatism is gonna be debated? Romney, if he has a prayer here, is gonna have to figure conservatism out. He's gonna have to able to articulate it like he believes it, loves it, and understands it. The one thing Mitt Romney has trouble doing is connecting with his audience. That's why the jokes of him being a Ken doll. He just doesn't connect. The campaign places look great, the flags and the banners and the popcorn and the peanuts are all good, but the, "I believe in an America founded by the founders, and I want America to believe in America that America believes in America and founders believe in America..."

What, what, what? Platitudes aren't gonna get it, and I don't know that... Romney obviously has decided to go after Newt on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac. It worked in Iowa with the super PAC ads, but I don't know. I think Romney's problem is really not so much Newt as it is what it's always been: The base just doesn't think he's conservative! That's all it is, and of course that ticks off the establishment. Let me ask you... Oh, you know, we did Operation Chaos. Oh, do you know what? I didn't know this. Nobody tells me anything. Have you seen the George Clooney movie Ides of March? Well, it was up for Academy Awards. (George Clooney, the actor.) It's about Operation Chaos.

The subplot, the first 40 minutes of that movie is about Operation Chaos and how ticked off the Democrats are. Nobody told me. It ends up being a subplot to the movie. Don't worry, I'm not gonna spoil it if you haven't seen it, but Clooney is an incumbent Ohio governor running for reelection and his opponent is gonna register a bunch of Republicans and independents in the primary to come in and vote for anybody but the incumbent. They even have Chris Matthews, a clip of Chris Matthews on MSNBC saying, "Yeah, Rush Limbaugh calls it 'Operation Chaos'" and explain it. It's clear that whoever ran this movie put it together is ticked off at Operation Chaos, so the first 40 minutes of the movie are about that.

It turns out that's not what the whole thing is about. I'm watching this, but my question is: "Did a long, protracted fight hurt Obama in 2008?" Did it hurt him? Did it hurt him? Now, you might say, "Yeah, he started making these bitter-clinger comments. If he hadn't had the media behind him..." If, if, if... The fact of the matter is that thing went down to the superdelegates toss-up and Obama wins and Hillary lost. So it's another bit of conventional wisdom. "We've gotta stop this campaign. Oh, my God. How? We can't have this. Can't have Newt out there. Why, Newt's gonna turn everybody off before it's all over! Newt's just gonna destroy the party. Newt's gonna destroy the party! We've got to stop this."

(interruption) What argument about the general election? I just got through saying... (interruption) Well, what do you think my point is in asking if it hurt Obama? That was a long primary. Did he win? He won! Operation Chaos, we kept it going. We were trying to have Obama exposed; we figured Hillary was the only person in the campaign with the gonads to do it. The press weren't vetting Obama. The whole point about Operation Chaos was to have the truth about Obama come out -- and to have a greater chance of that, we wanted to have the campaign go on. The campaign went on and on and on, a long campaign, and it didn't hurt Obama, did it?

So why is it that a long primary campaign is gonna hurt the Republican nominee? If the result of a long campaign is that this party finally figures out that the only way they have to win this is conservatism, it's a win-win. Let it play out! Don't panic! If Newt is a flawed candidate, it is a long campaign that's gonna show. Everybody is saying, "Newt can't win in the general. He's too flawed." Fine, then don't worry about it! He'll implode sometime in the primary. If he's gonna implode, he's gonna implode! The longer it goes on, the longer he has to implode. I'm just taking their theory and throwing it back at 'em. Why panic here, folks? Everything's okay!


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gope; newt; rino; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Yossarian

Kerry was ahead of Bush in the polls all year in 2004, at least up until July, when one poll had him 7 points ahead. Not everyone can be so ignorant to think that what’s in the polls now is set in stone for the rest of the year, especially when South Carolina just swung 30 points to Newt in less than 2 weeks.

This is absolutely not about electability. As Jonah Goldberg brilliantly wrote weeks ago, the GOP establishment is afraid Newt will WIN, not that he will lose, as written in the article linked below. Frankly, I don’t fully understand why. But I know the electability argument for Romney is bogus, because experienced politicians are not so ignorant as to think polls are set in stone this early in an election.

Newtzilla to the Rescue

41 posted on 01/23/2012 2:13:10 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

I don’t believe Rush is with the elite. He’s too rich and too powerful in his own right to care about what the elite think about anything. If anything the elites are inferior to him. If his views align with theirs it is purely coincidental.

42 posted on 01/23/2012 2:13:25 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Newt’s plan, the 21st Century Contract with America, is on The WSJ said his tax plan was bold while Romney’s was timid.

43 posted on 01/23/2012 2:20:14 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Supposedly Michael Savage said on his show that a member of the media spoke to him and quoted Romney as saying that he “hates conservatives.”

The best quality of Romney for us is that he’s not a very good liar. His contempt for the likes of Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich is barely concealed.

44 posted on 01/23/2012 2:23:48 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

When this thing started, Newt was probably about my fourth choice, after Palin, Cain and Perry

My sentiments as well. The above three names and Bachman were true conservatives that the GOP establishment did not want to help. The GOP Establishment would rather keep their moderate power base and not make waves. The GOP Establishment could care less if Obama wins re-election. In fact the GOP Establishment wants Obama to really screw up the country 2012-2016 so that in 2017 a GOP Dogcatcher could take office.

45 posted on 01/23/2012 2:25:56 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; cincinnati65; Graybeard58; KansasGirl

It’s not so much about Rush giving anything away, or about Mitt being able to execute the plan. It’s why is Rush giving Mitt the best possible advice to begin with? It comes back to this: if the Establishment is the problem, why do *anything* to encourage the Establishment candidate?

KG, I felt that way for a long time. One thing I only learned recently is that, if the latest Arbitron numbers are to be believed, Rush’s audience has fallen off steeply. I wonder if it has anything to do w people thinking this election is too important *not* to take a stand against Establishment types, such as Romney?

46 posted on 01/23/2012 2:26:15 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Newt’s plan, the 21st Century Contract with America, is on

I think he's gotta start selling it like Cain did with "9-9-9". And by that I mean out of his mouth, not gathering dust on the website.

47 posted on 01/23/2012 2:42:24 PM PST by Yossarian ("All the charm of Nixon. All the competency of Carter." - SF Chronicle comment post on Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PjhCPA

-——He does not support one candidate over the other——

You are correct in that he must appear neutral during primary season.

However, back in the olddays, before Free Republic, there was a revolution and the Republicans ended 40 years of Democrat rule. Newt was at the forefront. There was a new crop of piss and vinegar Republicans with Newt as their leader.

Rush was their mascot. Rush was invited to give the keynote welcoming address to the freshmen. His ties to Newt are old and deep

I have no doubt that Newt is the one he favors most

48 posted on 01/23/2012 2:43:01 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: olezip
[The solution is simple. The Republican establishment just has to switch places with the Tea Party. Let the leaders of the Tea Party take over the reins of the Republican establishment. Then we will see very positive results for all of us and, better still, for the entire country!

Surely the Republican establishment will better see what is going on if they have to rebuild their base. For now, they should resign in disgrace and let the genuine leaders of the people take over. The Republican establishment knows that they are not leading, so they should get out of the way!]

The establishment is not just going to bow down and get out of the way. However, the base can take over. Conservatives and Tea Party types can pay $10.00 to get on the ballot to run as precinct chairman. Once elected they get to vote for the leadership of the party.

Last election, 50% of the precinct chairs didn't even have anyone sign up. If the base really wants a seat at the table, this is what you have to do in every single county precinct in the country.

49 posted on 01/23/2012 2:51:03 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Several websites and news broadcasts here in FLA are portraying Rush as being anti-Newt and pro-Willard. What’s up with this?

You, the websites and news programs in FL, or anywhere else need to stop speculating that Rush is endorsing Romney. Rush is endorsing no one during the primaries. That means he is not endorsing Gingrich, Romney, Santorum or Paul

Do you need someone to tell you who to vote for?

50 posted on 01/23/2012 2:55:04 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, Kaslin, and that includes you.

51 posted on 01/23/2012 3:19:19 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
[Problem is it is the conservative GOP versus the RINO GOP and Democrats

Sadly we are in the minority

I ain’t optimistic]

Poppy cock. There are more conservatives in this country than liberals. The elites of both parties have just managed to keep them divided.

I live in a county that has almost no Republicans. The people are 98% social conservative, and majority fiscal conservatives. They kinda remind me of Zell Miller.

These Dems run on a conservative message that could have come straight from the Republican conservative play book.

We had a conservative Republican run for state representative. His message was fiscal responsibility, pro life, pro traditional marriage etc.

He just pointed out to them that the leadership in the National Democratic party didn't believe in any of those things. And 50 years or more of Democratic representation was ended, with 70% voting for him.

Don't believe for a second that conservatives don't outnumber the libs. All these Reagan Dems have to hear is a clear conservative message from some one who truly believes it.

A warning, though, the workers are members of unions, but if you avoid attacking unions, any conservative should do well.

52 posted on 01/23/2012 3:31:17 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
I live in a county that has almost no Republicans. The people are 98% social conservative, and majority fiscal conservatives.

So how come they are democrats
53 posted on 01/23/2012 3:46:54 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bert

Rush supports anyone who can and does articulate true conservative values from the heart as Newt has been doing of late.

54 posted on 01/23/2012 4:01:08 PM PST by PjhCPA (They all suck. Rick sucks the least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Their parents were Democrats, and they grew up believing that the Democrats were for the little guy, Republicans were just for the Rich.

They are not political junkies, and could not tell you what either party’s platform is. They are beginning to realize that this is NOT their father’s Democrat party, though.

55 posted on 01/23/2012 4:35:23 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

The Rinos know the conservative base of the party. They just hate conservatives. Rinos think they are superior to the base of the party. They think global socialism and corporatism is superior to American constitutional liberity and small business. They want to work with rich, beautiful people - not the riff raff nobodies. They think they are citizens of the world and they don’t like Americans.

Last time conservatives rose up against them and Newt was in power, he made the election conservative and national and Rinos did not fare so well. It’s time for them to go.

56 posted on 01/23/2012 5:49:41 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

They should have realized it long ago
I was raised a democrat and switched parties when I was 32 in 68 and the democrats have become much more radical since then

57 posted on 01/23/2012 6:02:40 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
The "GOP Establishment" and Mitt Romney are DEMOCRAT MOLES. Dig them out. They don't care between Romney and Obama.

You don't really get it. There is no Democrat Party. There is no Republican Party. There is only the Ruling Elite, versus the rest of us. Some get to play roles on the D side of the stage, some play roles on the R side, but they are just roles. Most of them no more believe their lines than a defense attorney believes in his thug client's innocence.

When the play is done, and the lights go out, they go and hang out together and laugh at the "bitter clingers" in "flyover country".

That's how Republican consultant Mary Matelin marries Democrat consultant James Carville. Or how "conservative firebrand" Ann Coulter decides to date Bill Maher. From one way of looking at it, one could ask "how could two people with such opposite world views get together?". But they are just playing roles for money.

The real game is how to get "insider" status, and be in a position to profit from knowledge of what's really going on, and how to use influence and position to escape prosecution.

58 posted on 01/23/2012 6:09:54 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

LOL. Well some people are slow learners. My self, I grew up in Reagan country. Moved here a long time ago. I don’t talk politics much, but I beat the heck out of issues and which candidate is best on the issues important to them.

59 posted on 01/23/2012 6:10:15 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

In times past Rush has without a doubt been a cheerleader and waterboy for the GOP establishment, despite his protests that he’s not part of it and that they don’t like him. Bush the Elder and Bush the Illegal Alien simply had to invite Rush to hang out at the White House and he swooned.

But I have to give Palm Beach Fats credit for what he was saying today. I think he did a good job of describing what has been going on with the insiders versus the base. Whether he continues to skewer the establishment is another matter- a White House invite will likely turn his head once again.

Hannity, Mini-Me, is another matter. He is and will always remain a loyal GOP lapdog.

60 posted on 01/23/2012 9:43:24 PM PST by Pelham (Vultures for Romney. We pluck your carcass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson