Skip to comments.NBCer Says Newt Represents ‘Resentment,’ ‘Racism,’ ‘Angry White Male Rage’
Posted on 01/24/2012 9:53:02 AM PST by tcrlaf
During Monday nights The Ed Show, host Ed Schultz took on former House Speaker Newt Gingrichs penchant for vilifying President Obama with the coded language of racism. During the panel segment, Salons Joan Walsh summed Gingrich up in easily-deciphered fashion, telling Schultz that Newt is the face of the politics of resentment and racism and angry white male rage that led voters to vote against their own economic interests.
Schultz began the segment with a clip of Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) telling CNN, Newt Gingrich is throwing red meat to the base, saying little words and phrases that we are very familiar here in the South. Im saying hes appealing to an element in this party that will see President Obama as different from all other presidents that we have had.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
Can I get a RACE CARD!!!
That’s pretty weak from that group...
Frankly I’m dissapointed that there isn’t any white male rage. It’s way past due.
Why Brian Williams, George Stephonufolus, Andrea Mitchell, the reason theres no difference is they all fit the role of the Democrats subordinate facilitators in
the Delphi Technique;
The stage is now set for the rest of the agenda to take place.
At this point, the audience is generally broken up into discussionor breakoutgroups of seven or eight people each. Each of these groups is to be led by a subordinate facilitator.
Within each group, discussion takes place of issues, already decided upon by the leadership of the meeting. Here, too, the facilitator manipulates the discussion in the desired direction, isolating and demeaning opposing viewpoints.
Pretty funny that this thread followed this one by a few minutes:
Faux-Romney teaming up with NBC-Obama to try and derail Newt so that Willard runs against the Kenyan.
As has been the plan all along.
I am not a racist I am a realist
Here we go!! Get ready for a wild ride
Does it ever occur to these small minds that whites are sick of the race card. It’s overuse is not making folks complicit to their doctrine. They are getting pissed off and race relations are going backwards because of this.
You wonder if any of these lib “reporters” has ever made a racist remark in their entire lives. My guess is they have. They’d never admit to it, though.
coded language = no actual examples to support the allegations.
Joan Walsh said THE EXACT SAME THING on an MSNBC panel today.
CREATE THE MEME, FRAME THE MEME, FEED THE MEME, PIMP THE MEME
“I’’m glad the children were here so they could listen to some authentic frontier gibberish!”
Man they hit the nail on the head! I wondered why I was supporting Herman Cain? Now that the MSM knocked out Cain I support Newt! They won’t knock him out!!! GO NEWT GO!!!!
Well, this team you’re either gonna vote for the angry WHITE male or the angry BLACK male.......and we’ve seen what a pizz poor job the angry black male has done...
Yes, President Obama IS different from all other presidents we have ever had.
HE IS THE FIRST COMMUNIST TO HOLD THE OFFICE!!!!!
If we’re drawing conclusions based on our own biases I guess a reasonable conclusion regarding Special Ed is that he’s a rabid wild hog.
NBC set up the crowd yesterday and republicans sat there again and took their crap.
NBC wanted the crowd to shut up because they had seen the last two debates where the crowd had booed the moderators and cheered Newt for exposing their bias.
NBC protected Williams last night and hopefully never again will the crowd just sit there like stuffed animals taking order from the elitist liberal MSM.
That is quite rich.
Ed Schultz represents the angry white man.
He is monosyballic the rare times he uses words to speak instead of his usual guttural grunts which are accompanied with large quantities of sputum overflowing from his unusually large pie hole.
When I was a kid, there was comic strip which epitomized Ed called Alley Oop.
Newt may be an angry white man at times but his vocabulary is polysyballic and he doesn’t slobber all over himself as well as the cameras.
And Salon’s Joan Walsh is the ass of the politics of stupidity.
Well, you can count me as having it...enough for several...be glad to share...plenty to go around.
Just because we are not in the street with spittle flying from full throated screams like those leftists do doesn’t mean its not there...its is.. and it burns clear and cold. No need to demonstrate it...just going to go do it and get the job done.
There’s no racism and certainly no resentment...pulease....
It will be a Novemba to rememba.
Special Ed shot and killed his own dog.
It would be worth nominating Gingrich if for no other reason just too see the liberal propagandists posing a journalists go through complete vicious meltdown...all the while calling Newt the "hateful", "bigoted" one.
And what exactly does president Hussein and the department of black justice represent?
Schulz is large slab of fatback with a mealy mouth and a pea sized brain.
I don’t see any evidence that Schulz, other than blathering for his under deserve paycheck on a flunky propaganda outlet, has ever been “down with the struggle”
No doubt he lives in a gated community that is 1% other than white. Even then the other than white folks who all have college degrees and make $200k a year.
I’ll have to add Newt to my list. If you’re interested:
“A List of MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Accusing Everybody and Everything of “Racism”
...Another Caucasian Gary. :)
I am white but not angry in the least. I am resolute that I am not going to let the media and GOP elites pick my choice for the nomination w/o a fight. I am hoping Newt gets over 40 here in FL. Oh the panties in a wad and the angst would be precious.
I've always found that to be a curious expression, which is always used by the left when people they think should be in their constituancy don't wind up there.
Typical statist paternalism. They know what is in me econonic interests, but I don't. It seems to me that having my bank account ransacked by the burdensome taxation of local, state, and federal governments, and then to be pissed away by them, is not in my economic interests, but what do I know? That idea probably comes from the same wrongheaded thinking that leads me to believe that I have gotten and kept a job based on my skills and hard work, when the truth is that it was probably someone in the government who was responsible. What an ingrate I am!
White people have a series of racist codewords?
Are they like MSM codewords?
Urban, economically deprived, minorities and the like?
Well, I’m FEMALE, and just sort of White with a lot of Red mixed in, but I am pretty enraged too! LOL!
So BO and the dems can “vilify” the white Republicans all they want, but when a white Republican talks about BOs poor record, they are using racist code words. What a joke these people are.
Obama is the face of killing babies. Even those who survive an abortion. It doesn’t get any lower.
That ther is just funny....
They must be worried.
I don’t get it. If it’s okay for the race hustlers — Sharpton, Jackson, et al — to be the spokesmen for “angry black men,” after all the advances that group has seen in the last half a century, then why would it be improper for someone to act as spokesman for “angry white males” considering that all the gains in every other victim group has come at their expense?
Grrrr, I repeat, Grrrrr !
Somrthing people need to understand. Most companies run this way
Race relations have gone backward since the passage of the Civil Rights act of 1964....and its getting worse.
Subject-verb agreement is important.
“...host Ed Schultz took...angry white male...”
Angry white males have rights too, Eddie...ya stupid fascist lunatic.
And, this is a surprise to whom??
I used to hear that term “angry white male” in the 90’s. I never knew what it meant as I looked around me and did not see any. But now I know the left is diabolical and attributes derogatory terms to anyone who disagrees with them. They attach the terms “phobic” or “racist” to everything the right says and does now.
I don't know if it's the Act per-se, but the methodology of the left in marginalizing white males in our culture. It seems very much a tactic to me, and one that appeals to peoples base urge to feel someone else is responsible for their problems. It's fortunate that white males are not a demographic minority presently because I'm certain that if we were, there would have been an American equivalent of the Wansee Conference to address the "white male problem" by now. I would have white males be fair-minded decent men, good providers and wise leaders, and (for God's sake) stop behaving like whipped dogs and start telling leftist demagogues to go straight to hell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.