Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unions, Buffett, Robber Barons and Cronies Now Have Our Oil, Oh My ^ | January 25, 2012 | John Ransom

Posted on 01/25/2012 6:18:02 AM PST by Kaslin

It’s already been widely reported that Warren Buffett, a major shareholder in Obama, Inc. will be one of the primary beneficiaries of the decision from the White House to kill the Keystone pipeline and the jobs it would create.

The administration now makes no attempt at all to disguise the fact that most decisions he makes are made in the best interest of Obama, Inc. shareholders.

Buffett’s railroad, the BNSF Railway- now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Obama, Inc.- in a remarkable coincidence, will instead, apparently and patriotically, transport Canadian oil to the US at only a slight premium to the oil companies than it would have cost to transport via the Keystone pipeline.

Ohmygosh. What a fortunate coincidence for all of us. Maybe now Buffett’s secretary will be able to afford the higher tax bracket her jerk-off boss puts her in and she won’t have to decide between her medication and cat food.     

Obama has decided thusly to kill the pipeline even though: 1) Transport costs will be more expensive; and 2) The transport method will introduce more of the dreaded “carbon” into our atmosphere. Remember the thing that activists have been protesting against?  

Net/net environmentalists have just made sure that more “carbon” will kill our planet even more quickly under their theory.

It’s a win-win-win. Obama and Buffett and Buffett’s secretary all benefit.

And really: Who else is there to be concerned about?

Seriously though: You just can’t find a group more gullible than environmental activists.

It used to be that starting a religious cult was a convenient way to control the gullible. But today’s sophisticated con artist would be well advised to invent a global crisis, you know, like Global Polar Bear Cannibalism.       

Imagine spending six months working toward stopping Keystone because you believe with all your liberal bleeding heart that you’ll stop the dirty, planet-killing carbon, only to read today’s article from Bloomberg about the Buffet Express.         

While Buffett apparently is a shareholder in Obama, Inc., enviros are only sharecroppers in the concern.  

Because anytime you have a liberal policy that 1) is more expensive and 2) doesn’t even attempt to address the issue that liberal activists say they are protesting- you know, like too much “carbon” in our atmosphere- you know somewhere, somehow, someway that another, better-heeled liberal shareholder has just stuck it to the sharecroppers on Obama’s plantation.
They tried it previously with Al Gore’s Climate Exchange. I’m still waiting for a thank you from environmentalists for stopping that scam.  

I wrote previously about how Labors’ International Union of North America- another sharecropper on Fantasy Island- denounced president Obama’s decision to kill Keystone. But a handful of other unions will benefit greatly because their workers work for Obama shareholder Warren Buffett.

I know, I know: It surprised me too.

Here’s how the Transport Workers Union explained it:

Under President Jim Little, TWU has been a leader in advocating for major “New Deal” type investments in infrastructure modernization and repair, public transportation, energy conservation and climate protection as a means of putting people to work and laying the foundations of a more sustainable economic future for the United States. This is a transition that sound science and sound economics tell us we must make today, not in some far off future, in order to prevent irreversible harm to our planet’s climate, and to provide good jobs now for the millions of Americans who desperately need them. The proposed Keystone XL pipeline would take us in the opposite direction, increasing our reliance on dirty bitumen sands oil and stalling critical efforts to create the jobs we need to transition to a more sustainable economy.

The pipeline appeared to be on a fast track to approval, but thanks to the efforts of TWU and a handful of other unions allied with millions of climate justice activists, in November the State Department delayed its decision on the project, and President Obama has said that if Republicans again try to force him to make a premature decision by tying the pipeline’s fate to another payroll tax cut extension early in 2012, he’ll kill the project for good.

So now we know where Obama draws the line: terrorist are OK; illegal immigrants; mob violence- good with all that. But force him to make up his mind? You’ve really crossed the line now buddy.  

Thanks to goodness that Obama’s not thinking about the good of the country, but rather just the politics of the whole thing. Maybe we can get him to hold his breath too until the GOP backs down? Hey, it’s worth a shot. He’s done dumber things…this year.  

No mention from the Transport Workers union in their communiqué that their workers will now transport the oil that would have gone via the pipeline. Also no mention that a million barrels of oil transported per day will produce for railroads about $3 billion in annual revenues for union workers who are in pay dispute with Buffett’s BNSF and other national carriers.

Ohmygosh. They forgot to tell us that part too.

Where will they get the money to raise union wages?

Ta Da! President Obama has now found the money to settle the dispute.

In October, Obama signed an executive order declaring an emergency and created a Presidential Emergency Board (PEB) to forestall a railroad strike.

I guess the PEB found a way out of the difficulty. It’s just a gut feeling I have, but perhaps there will be no strike now.  

But the fun doesn’t stop there ladies and gentleman.

Just think of this: Warren Buffett and the railway workers now control a significant portion of your oil. Greaaaat. We thought we’d stop letting our enemies dictate to us once we used less Middle East, Iranian and Venezuelan oil.

Think again.  

Get ready to pay and pay and pay….

The energy publication the Platts puts it this way:

John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil used trains to help solidify the power of his trust. (A paper written by two professors on the history of Standard Oil and rail put it this way: "The charge leveled most consistently against Standard Oil is that it secured unfair competitive advantages by negotiating advantageous rates with the railroads over which it shipped crude from the 'Oil Regions' of Pennsylvania and Ohio to its Cleveland refineries and sent kerosene and other refined petroleum products to markets on the East Coast.")

But now the railroads will be able to switch roles with the Standard Oils of the world.

And all this time we thought Keystone was just a dispute about carbon, when in fact it was just a falling out amongst cronies. Some of them, it turns out, are shareholders and some of them, it turns out, are sharecroppers.

Well, either way, global warming, once again, just created a bumper crop of something for someone.  

And that something stinks.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: buffet; esmit; keystone; obama

1 posted on 01/25/2012 6:18:03 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But today the news is swooning over Obama's order to send in the SEALs.

Are you tired of being played yet, America?

2 posted on 01/25/2012 6:31:57 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Heck, this whole angle to the Keystone pipeline issue doesn't even get a lot of attention right here on FreeRepublic. The author of this article is late to the game, as far as I'm concerned. Check out Post #10 in the following thread (from more than two months ago):

Click Here

3 posted on 01/25/2012 6:38:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I hadn't heard about this aspect either.

Why won't republicans hit the president on his blatant cronyism? Are they afraid they are as culpable?

4 posted on 01/25/2012 6:46:26 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A few years ago a plan to upgrade rail lines across South Dakota and southern Minnesota to bring low sulpher coal from Wyoming to Mississippi River barge terminals was killed over “environmental” concerns. While environmentalists celebrate the killing of the XL pipeline, the BNSF Railway will soon be hauling tank cars of far more environmentally dangerous crude oil in the same area and there is no environmental outcry. When was the last time you heard of a pipeline in the US causing major environmental damage compared to railway accidents?

5 posted on 01/25/2012 6:48:04 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Soros influence in Canada opposing the pipeline.

Canadian Resources Minister: Soros ordered pipeline blocked

Canadian Indians Opposing Pipeline Accepted Soros Money (Tides Canada, COF)

6 posted on 01/25/2012 7:04:36 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There’s a lot more to the train issue than enriching Warren Buffet. I have been mentioning this for months, but no one seems to be listening.

They have been moving the shale oil by train to west coast refineries for about year. One train car carries 6 or 7 hundred barrels. Trains are very disruptive No one likes the noise, the pollution or the delay of traffic, but trains are a big part of the agenda 21 wild lands project, referred to as multi-modal transportation corridors. I think that these rail lines through rural areas were the purpose of that executive order that Obama issued last summer, creating a rural council. Read the executive order on the Blaze and see if you don’t think it fits.

7 posted on 01/25/2012 7:09:09 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Environmentalists = Soros bidding

$US 10 Million for 43 Organizations in a “TAR SANDS” Campaign. Paid for by Tides USA (2009/2010)

...In both the U.S. and Canada, a large number of these environmental organizations are all funded by a single American foundation: The Tides Foundation ("Tides USA").

In 2010 alone, the Sierra Club was paid $420,000, Environmental Defense Canada Inc. was paid $250,000 and Greenpeace Canada was paid $200,000 for participation in the "Tar Sands Campaign," according to 2010 tax returns for Tides USA. As reported in The Financial Post, in 2009 the U.S

8 posted on 01/25/2012 7:21:49 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson