Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama eligibility hearing to be broadcast live
wnd ^ | 1/25/12 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 01/25/2012 10:32:42 PM PST by Nachum

A political action committee which believes Barack Obama is not legally qualified for U.S. president plans a live broadcast of tomorrow’s hotly anticipated court hearing in Atlanta regarding Obama’s eligibility.

The Article II Super PAC says it will provide uncensored, gavel-to-gavel video coverage of the event beginning at 9 a.m. Eastern at this online address.

Based in Simi Valley, Calif., the PAC says it decided to act out of a sense of frustration, since most national news outlets have been ignoring the constitutional mandate that presidents be a “natural-born citizen,” which the PAC maintains is a person who is a child of two U.S. citizen parents.

“The PAC saw the need to do this last month, because of the often incomplete and biased coverage of this issue by mainstream news media and recently received permission from the court,” said director Helen Tansey, who will personally manage on-site efforts.

“After the office of the president of the United States was usurped by a dual-citizen candidate in 2008, the nation was awakened to the realization that the U.S. Constitution, in particular Article II and presidential eligibility, no longer matters to our elected representatives and the mainstream media,” the PAC says on its website.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; broadcast; certifigate; eligibility; georgiahearing; naturalborncitizen; obama; superpac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
I have a huge bag of popcorn set aside for this.
1 posted on 01/25/2012 10:32:46 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If Zero gets bumped from the ballot, Atlanta’s liable to be burnt to the ground!!


2 posted on 01/25/2012 10:34:45 PM PST by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That’s a lot of broadcast media to pay for, especially when the most likely outcome will be the judge pushing his decision back to a later time.


3 posted on 01/25/2012 10:35:18 PM PST by Kevmo (If you can define a man by the depravity of his enemies, Rick Santorum must be a noble soul indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; philman_36

Here:

“ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS ON JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET

The live video stream will be located at this page and on the home-page of this website.”

http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html


4 posted on 01/25/2012 10:38:05 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

BOOKMARK


5 posted on 01/25/2012 10:43:01 PM PST by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Newt, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Did you read the Sonoran News article I mentioned and see my comment about the electors angle being important?

They are the ones who have to make the real effort, like the men in Georgia did.

6 posted on 01/25/2012 10:45:16 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They have permission to film in the courtroom?


7 posted on 01/25/2012 10:50:49 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert ("She turned me into a Newt . . . backer!" . . . . . Go Newt 2012!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Something weird here ..... why did O’s attorney, instead of filing an amended motion to quash (a decent one this time & the judge probably would have granted it), write a crybaby letter to the SOS? All the previous predictions I’ve seen were that an amended motion to quash would be filed as a matter of course.


8 posted on 01/25/2012 10:50:54 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I foresee an automobile “accident” or other mishap for the film crew.


9 posted on 01/25/2012 10:51:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What online address and 9 a.m. CA time?


10 posted on 01/25/2012 10:58:54 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; Nachum

Ok thanks. I should have scrolled down first.


11 posted on 01/25/2012 11:01:13 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Bookmark for 9am est


12 posted on 01/25/2012 11:01:13 PM PST by FishinTX (kill terrorists, protect the border, punch hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Zero’s playing a dangerous game. If he loses by default at an administrative level, he might be barred from any kind of appeal...


13 posted on 01/25/2012 11:01:51 PM PST by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Do you think the judge is sleeping in his own bed tonight?


14 posted on 01/25/2012 11:06:01 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Yeah, I read the Sonoran news story on the upcoming event and synopsis of the happenings. Good article.

-snip-

“Citing Haynes v. Wells, Hatfield said the entire burden of proof is placed upon defendant “to affirmatively establish his eligibility for office,” and stated, “Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell are not required, and should not be required, ‘to disprove anything regarding [Defendant Obama’s] eligibility to run for office …’” “

Referring to Jablonski’s argument in his motion to quash in Taitz’s challenge, Hatfield said he seemed “to somehow be contending that the fact defendant Obama currently occupies the presidency is, in itself, evidence of defendant Obama’s constitutional eligibility to that office.”

“On the contrary,” wrote Hatfield, citing Malone v. Minchew, “there is [no] presumption, at least not a conclusive presumption, that a person named or appointed to an office ... was eligible and qualified to hold the office. Such qualification or eligibility depends upon facts which, when challenged and drawn in question in a proper judicial proceeding, is a judicial question to be determined by the courts.”

-end snip-

As it should be.

If Obama does not qualify in just one state, I don’t think the media can ignore Obama’s lack of eligibility. I think Obama has a very little chance of winning the 15 electoral votes, if he does remain on the GA ballot.


15 posted on 01/25/2012 11:06:24 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

16 posted on 01/25/2012 11:07:29 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

17 posted on 01/25/2012 11:11:11 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Who are the presidential electors in Georgia?

Michael K. Jablonski
260 Brighton Road NE
Atlanta, GA 30309 Party: Democrat
Age: 56
Occupation: Attorney

18 posted on 01/25/2012 11:13:09 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Only if he/she is crazy or a fool. I wouldn’t be in the same area code of my house if I were him/her.


19 posted on 01/25/2012 11:17:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s what I was thinking. I wouldn’t be driving my own car to work in the morning, either.


20 posted on 01/25/2012 11:21:03 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Well, Jablonski is a highly partisan Democrat. Interesting.


21 posted on 01/25/2012 11:24:07 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

In the last few days there have been several posts about this trial and the procedure of/for the three different complaints. I look at my copy of the Constitution and take note that in Article II that the Fed Congress only specifies there will be electors acting under the Fed stipulations. There is no mention of what constitutes/defines a ‘natural born citizen’. The same Article specifies actions/duties of the specified electors, but there is still no directions as to what constitutes/defines a ‘natural born citizen’. I believe that it is this ‘hole’ or lack of definition that in either place in Article II that Obama and his enablers have been using. However , Article II also specifies electors from the ‘respective’ states shall submit votes of the electors to congress. An important question for me is ‘If a state does not submit any elector ballots would that hold all other ballots from being certified because the full body of states has not been part of the congressional certification?. Would this allow Obama to just keep on ruling as POTUSA? I would hope that there would be simply Obama’s name left off the ballots for certification and all elector ballots from all states be submitted to Congress.


22 posted on 01/25/2012 11:25:26 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; HiTech RedNeck

Note that the year isn’t given. Whether it is for the upcoming or past elections...??? I can’t tell.


23 posted on 01/25/2012 11:26:20 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Mark time—march.


24 posted on 01/25/2012 11:26:35 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: djf

Didn’t they already try to do that during the War of Northern Aggression?


26 posted on 01/25/2012 11:28:34 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
There is no mention of what constitutes/defines a ‘natural born citizen’.
The Constitution isn't a dictionary. Lots of things aren't defined therein.

An important question for me is ‘If a state does not submit any elector ballots would that hold all other ballots from being certified because the full body of states has not been part of the congressional certification?.
Good question. If you choose to look into it let me know what you find.

Would this allow Obama to just keep on ruling as POTUSA?
Another good question. If you choose to look into it let me know what you find.

27 posted on 01/25/2012 11:40:38 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
....well...if 0bambi (peas be upon him) is not eligible to be President then the 2 term rule doesn't apply to him....

I guess that's why he wants to "consolidate government departments"

28 posted on 01/25/2012 11:56:39 PM PST by spokeshave (Mitt will release his tax returns when 0bambi releases his Birth Certificate and grades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There may not be a Hearing since Obamas Lawyers sent a Letter to the Secretary of State in Georgia Yesterday saying they were not Coming and that the Suit should be toosed out


29 posted on 01/26/2012 3:15:53 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

thx


30 posted on 01/26/2012 3:20:57 AM PST by patton ("Je pense donc je suis," - My Horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

A letter to the SoS means nothing. This is a judicial proceeding and motions need to be submitted to the tribunal in the case. Besides, did you read the S0S reply to Jablonski’s letter?


31 posted on 01/26/2012 3:33:39 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
-- If a state does not submit any elector ballots would that hold all other ballots from being certified because the full body of states has not been part of the congressional certification?. Would this allow Obama to just keep on ruling as POTUSA? I would hope that there would be simply Obama's name left off the ballots for certification and all elector ballots from all states be submitted to Congress. --

To your first question, Congress counts the electoral ballots, and there is a winner, even if a state does not send electoral ballots. So, yes, assuming he gets a majority without GA' ballots, Obama retains the office.

The electors are bound to the party, and assuming for the sake of argument that the DEM party takes GA, then those electoral ballots will be cast for Obama or whoever the DEM party decides to substitute. Even if Obama's name is not on the precinct ballots, the party is free to put Obama's name on the electoral ballots.

The primary defect in the last election lies with Congress, which is about as corrupt and useless institution as can be found in all of history.

32 posted on 01/26/2012 3:35:17 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Where is that Reply? I did not see the reply


33 posted on 01/26/2012 3:48:53 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Where is the reply?


34 posted on 01/26/2012 3:55:59 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

I don’t feel like finding the reply and linking to it, so I’ll summarize it for you:

Hey Mr. Attorney-for-Obama - I’d suggest you participate in the hearing. Have a nice day.


35 posted on 01/26/2012 4:42:28 AM PST by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

I found the letter on another posting.

I agree with your summary.


36 posted on 01/26/2012 5:35:36 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: djf

Only certain parts of it,

but indeed, that could cause HUNDREDS of dollars in damages if it happens.


37 posted on 01/26/2012 5:38:08 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
If Obama does not qualify in just one state, I don’t think the media can ignore Obama’s lack of eligibility.

I bet they'll try.

38 posted on 01/26/2012 5:39:35 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia
They can't go into court because they will lose and dignify the process. They don't have an original BC, and they can't hand over his school documents. He was not born in the Hospital listed, so he may as well have been born an mars.

They need to lose and stigmatize the process, and politically attack those who are running it. They can't put the facts on the table. They need to poison the process.

You will see the Judge and the SOS dragged through the mud if he is DQ’d in Georgia. They wont appeal, because as a guilty party they can't risk going to court again.

39 posted on 01/26/2012 5:44:17 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-attorney-jablonski-slapped-down.html


40 posted on 01/26/2012 5:44:32 AM PST by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The feed is live now.


41 posted on 01/26/2012 5:45:59 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

SOS replied last night. Told them it would be a shame if they did not defend their position. Trial on.


42 posted on 01/26/2012 5:46:26 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Let’s hope he’s DQ’d but he and his thugs are slick as eel snot so I’ll believe it when I see it.


43 posted on 01/26/2012 5:53:49 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

I believe he said “Do so at your own peril”.


44 posted on 01/26/2012 5:54:04 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP
Additional feed:

Live Feed

45 posted on 01/26/2012 6:00:07 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698); ballplayer
There isn't one because the judge told the plaintiffs they didn't need to file one. That means he doesn't need one because that after reading the defendants answer, he has pretty much decided to rule in favor of the plaintiffs. If you have read his order on Obama’s motion to dismiss, this is clear.
46 posted on 01/26/2012 6:14:47 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Any Black Panthers out front of the court house?


47 posted on 01/26/2012 6:26:25 AM PST by FishinTX (kill terrorists, protect the border, punch hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FishinTX

Unless they read Freerepublic, how would they even know about the hearing?


48 posted on 01/26/2012 6:33:55 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Can you understand what he’s saying?


49 posted on 01/26/2012 7:00:26 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Couldn’t the judge just ask - Do you have the BC with you or not? Stop with all the semantics!


50 posted on 01/26/2012 7:15:03 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson