Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No ruling in ‘birther' challenge
AJC ^ | 12:15 p.m. Thursday, January 26, 2012 | Bill Rankin

Posted on 01/26/2012 10:44:59 AM PST by Pfesser

After hearing evidence with neither President Barack Obama nor his lawyers in attendance, a state administrative law judge on Thursday did not issue a ruling as to whether Obama can be allowed on the state ballot in November.

Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing.

"It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi.

"I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied.

Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing. "It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here -- a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country," Jablonski wrote.

Jablonski also served notice he would boycott the hearing.

In response, Kemp said the hearing to consider the challenges is required by Georgia law. "If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the [Office of State Administrative Hearings] proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril," Kemp wrote.

Thursday's hearing was held before a packed courtroom with almost every seat taken -- except for those at the defendant's table facing the judge.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012election; abovethelaw; bhocorruption; bhofascism; blantantcontempt; completcontempt; contempofcourt; contempt; contemptofjustice; contemptofoffice; corruption; elections; nobama2012; obama; obamaandgeorgia; thedictator; theking; wedontneedlaws

1 posted on 01/26/2012 10:45:04 AM PST by Pfesser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 01/26/2012 10:48:04 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

Amazing the pure arrogance of this man and his ilk. He thumbs his nose at any other authority.


3 posted on 01/26/2012 10:53:03 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

The judge got the word . . . as expected, the entire matter is now cut and dried.


4 posted on 01/26/2012 10:53:50 AM PST by Mr. Wright (N\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

Have the thugs gotten to the judge?


5 posted on 01/26/2012 10:57:24 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing. "It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here -- a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country," Jablonski wrote. Jablonski also served notice he would boycott the hearing.

This is what has become of our US Constitution - innuendo is all that is required to swat down a pesky law suit brought by a state against the Federal tyranny we are living under. I am not aware of ANY court case that proved Zero has shown a VALID LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE proving he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN to two American citizen parents. Maybe I missed that case, although I thought I had been reviewing all that made it to an actual judge.

Why do both Obama’s State Department and the Senate require two US citizen parents for those born abroad to attain natural born citizen status?
6 posted on 01/26/2012 10:58:07 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

even if you think that this is all stupid and obama is being truthful surely one has to question why he just doe snot show the damn thing


7 posted on 01/26/2012 10:59:21 AM PST by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

Sounds like the fix is in. I wonder which member of the Malihi family found a bloodied horse’s head in their bed last night?

America is in the grip of a corrupt and illegitimate regime, and if the Constitution were on a heart monitor, it would be just about to flatline after this debacle in Georgia today.


8 posted on 01/26/2012 10:59:46 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

Not once has he produced any solid evidence to anyone yet the socialist frauds in the MSM ignore it. His democrat drones keep licking his rear end. This is how people like hitler rise to power. We must put an end to this nonsense in November and politically destroy obama and his radical anti american regime before he destroys this country, which he despises.


9 posted on 01/26/2012 11:00:23 AM PST by spawn44 (NSWWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
"Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing."

Later Wednesday, the judge received a knock on the door from a man in a black trenchcoat...

10 posted on 01/26/2012 11:04:34 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Word from someone in the courtroom is that the judge told them in the pretrial meeting that he was going to recommend that Obama be kept off the Georgia ballot. Praying.


11 posted on 01/26/2012 11:04:41 AM PST by Josephat (The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
"If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the [Office of State Administrative Hearings] proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril," Kemp wrote.

Sounds to me like Obama isn't out of the woods yet.

12 posted on 01/26/2012 11:08:40 AM PST by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

I want to know how this person knows what was said in camera?


13 posted on 01/26/2012 11:10:05 AM PST by My hearts in London - Everett (Still searching for the new tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

What is the real issue here is whether or not Kemp is a Soro’s SoS.


14 posted on 01/26/2012 11:11:15 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

If you’re speaking of anyone other than Orly, I’ll believe it. Otherwise not much of what comes from her comes to fruition. I, too, will be PRAYING that the judge keeps him off the ballot.

Please tell me word didn’t come from Orly :|


15 posted on 01/26/2012 11:13:58 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

yet the socialist frauds in the MSM ignore it........and Hannity and Rush and Bill E-0-Reilly and Beck and .......


16 posted on 01/26/2012 11:14:16 AM PST by Terry Mross (We need a second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Josephat
Word from someone in the courtroom is that the judge told them in the pretrial meeting that he was going to recommend that Obama be kept off the Georgia ballot. Praying.

That could be the first domino in a string of dominoes.
PRAYING INDEED.
17 posted on 01/26/2012 11:17:45 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

I had heard that someone submitted the DNC and RNC nomination papers from 2008 for Georgia with McCains stating he was constitutionally eligible, but the DNC had this statement removed.

I hope that holds some weight where even the DNC would not state he was constitutionally eligible.


18 posted on 01/26/2012 11:19:16 AM PST by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

“What is the real issue here is whether or not Kemp is a Soro’s SoS.”

Take that spew elsewhere. Brian Kemp is a republican and a person of integrity. No matter what decision he eventually arrives at George Soros won’t have anything to do with it. We may or may not like the final decision but Kemp will follow GA election law.


19 posted on 01/26/2012 11:23:57 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: musicman

The Quote of the Decade:
“ The fact that we are here today to debate raising America ‘s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America ‘s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, “the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”
~ Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006


20 posted on 01/26/2012 11:24:59 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (NOT VOTING gets 0bamao re-elected. Lets Newter the RINOS, then the Blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
I am not aware of ANY court case that proved Zero has shown a VALID LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE proving he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN...

The burden of proof is not on the defendant, it is upon the prosecution. It has to be proven that he has NOT done so. So far, not done.

21 posted on 01/26/2012 11:34:59 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

It has to be proven that he has NOT done so. So far, not done.

And, by “not done” I mean not proven in a court of law. So no flames, please!


22 posted on 01/26/2012 11:39:04 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

Sounds like BS that a judge would state before a hearing what he was going to rule after the hearing.


23 posted on 01/26/2012 11:53:42 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

O has not proven anything. Yet State law requires him to do so.


24 posted on 01/26/2012 11:57:10 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
Georgia court told Obama slam-dunk disqualified

...The judge is expected to review the evidence and make a recommendation to the state whether there is reason to be concerned about Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot

25 posted on 01/26/2012 12:02:29 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

Supposedly it came from someone named Dean Haskins. It is on one of the other threads.


26 posted on 01/26/2012 12:13:53 PM PST by Josephat (The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

Much more information here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2838105/posts


27 posted on 01/26/2012 12:17:20 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Not if he knew that Obama or his lawyer were not going to show. The lawyer informed the SOS of that fact the night before. How could he find for someone that didn’t put on a defense?


28 posted on 01/26/2012 12:18:19 PM PST by Josephat (The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Sounds like BS that a judge would state before a hearing what he was going to rule after the hearing.

Not BS, when you consider the circumstances.

Reportedly, the judge told the plaintiff's attorneys that he was going to enter a default judgement against Obama, because neither Obama or his representing counsel even showed up for the hearing.

The plaintiff's attorneys then asked for an opportunity to present their evidence to put it on record.

More info here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2838324/posts

29 posted on 01/26/2012 12:24:48 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: manc
(...I guess you DIDN'T read my tagline I've had for about 2 years...)
30 posted on 01/26/2012 12:30:58 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
This link is a good summary of the hearing from inside the court

Court eligibility hearing

31 posted on 01/26/2012 12:31:04 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

I agree!!


32 posted on 01/26/2012 12:31:52 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Sounds like BS that a judge would state before a hearing what he was going to rule after the hearing.

Not BS in this case since the defendant didn't show. Default judgement against defendant is standard procedure in that case.

33 posted on 01/26/2012 12:34:20 PM PST by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: justlurking; Josephat

I don’t question that the judge would rule in favor of the plaintiffs given that the defendant and his attorney didn’t show or preent evidence.

It just seems terribly out of order for the judge to call counsel to chambers, tell them his intent, and magically folks sitting in the courtroom know what the judge told the attorneys in camera.


34 posted on 01/26/2012 12:38:41 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
It just seems terribly out of order for the judge to call counsel to chambers, tell them his intent, and magically folks sitting in the courtroom know what the judge told the attorneys in camera.

I don't think that the judge's intent was reported until after the hearing was over.

I wasn't watching the entire hearing, but I was following the discussion here on FR among people that were watching it. The report didn't come out until some time after the hearing finished.

35 posted on 01/26/2012 12:47:31 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Great quote!!!!!!


36 posted on 01/26/2012 12:47:58 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
"Sounds like BS that a judge would state before a hearing what he was going to rule after the hearing."

Well the context was that in light of Obama's refusal to attend or even send a defense, the judge wanted to dispense with the hearing and issue a default judgement against Obama. The plantiffs then appealed to the judge to proceed with the hearing so that they could submit their testimony and let it become part of the record. The judge agreed to that. Thus the hearing proceeded.

37 posted on 01/26/2012 12:48:49 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

justlurking just explained that this story didn’t come out till AFTER the hearing. I just found it peculiar that the judge would call counsel into his chamber, then the audience in the courtroom knew what had happened in chambers.


38 posted on 01/26/2012 1:00:31 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I’m not sure the audience did. I got the impression that the report was from one of the attorneys that was invited into the judges chambers. But I’m not certain of that.

It could be a bogus report. It’s a little worrisome, that the judge didn’t immediately issue the ruling. But my guess is that he is going to include references to the plantiff’s arguments in his ruling.

It would be great if we could get Obama disqualified on not being natural born for both the primary and the general election and then get Romney disqualified for the same reason.


39 posted on 01/26/2012 1:28:10 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The original story was from an audience member, so that raised a few flags ... we’ll see in time whether it’s true or not, and the chronology.

I’m not surprised Malahi hasn’t issued a ruling, given the witnesses, documents put into evidence, etc. He’ll want to write up a ruling that relates each of them to GA law regarding a candidate’s getting on the ballot. Then, too, there’s the matter of the defendant and his counsel literally just blowing off the court and GA law.

Since the ruling will be controversial no matter what, and probably appealed, this judge will want to set out very clear how his ruling was achieved.


40 posted on 01/26/2012 1:35:15 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

But this is not a “birther” case. It is not based on the notion that a conspiracy has hidden the location of Obama’s birth.

The basis of this case is the precedent in Minor v. Happersett, which defined “natural born citizen” after the manner of Vattel’s notion of “natives”, thereby also agreeing with points made in the legislative history of the 14th Amendment. The birth certificate offered in pdf form by Obama is just fine. It confirms that his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, so the location of his birth is irrelevant: as defined by the SCOTUS in Minor v. Happersett, Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, and thus ineligible to be President.

If the judge rules on that basis, the appeal will have to get a higher court to rule against stare decisis to overturn the precedent of Minor v. Happersett, at which point the question over which “birthers” have exercised themselves would become a live issue.


41 posted on 01/26/2012 1:58:44 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. http://t.co/Qy873ai4


42 posted on 01/26/2012 2:33:41 PM PST by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

:: Take that spew elsewhere. ::

Really? I know nothing of Kemp and that’s why I asked. I didn’t deserve that.


43 posted on 01/26/2012 3:49:25 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

http://is.gd/9Oj5m3 The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there


44 posted on 01/26/2012 4:40:04 PM PST by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: musicman
One ruling... JUST ONE... would be sufficient to pry the lid off. Obama knows it. His flunkies know it. Hell, even the MSM knows it.

That is why they are all absolutely determined that there will never be such a ruling.

It's obvious (to me anyhow) that the reason Obama's lawyers "boycotted" the hearing is because if they showed up they would be forced to answer questions that would be devastating to the current illegal regime.

The biggest question that "Must Not Be Asked" in any venue where an answer is unavoidable is "Have you seen any of the documents in question?"

They haven't because those documents do not exist.

45 posted on 01/26/2012 6:24:13 PM PST by Ronin (Now 15 kilograms down since August last year. Hell yeah I'm bragging!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

Well there is one court they will all attend, when they stand before God. Justice will be true in the end. For now, it seems most of the judicial branch has joined in the sucession from the Constitution that the Executive branch has spawned.


46 posted on 01/27/2012 9:35:39 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"The burden of proof is not on the defendant, it is upon the prosecution. It has to be proven that he has NOT done so. So far, not done."

The burden of proof to establish eligibility is on the individual seeking the office.

47 posted on 01/27/2012 9:43:51 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson