Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Era of Voting for RINOs is Declared Over
Veritas2002 | 01-26-12 | Vanity

Posted on 01/26/2012 11:19:20 AM PST by veritas2002

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2012 11:19:25 AM PST by veritas2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

I could say that we need to learn to STOP voting for state supremacists, no what the party affiliation.

But it’s a little too late for that, I fear. Now, there’s a butcher’s bill to be paid.


2 posted on 01/26/2012 11:25:13 AM PST by Noumenon ("I tell you, gentlemen, we have a problem on our hands." Col. Nicholson-The Bridge on the River Qwai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

And now in 2012, the Republican Party insiders, along with the liberal press are trying to once again pick our candidate - a MODERATE Massachusetts Governor who introduced socialized medicine to his State and guess what my friends...

We lose either way.


3 posted on 01/26/2012 11:25:36 AM PST by Know et al (The greatest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with a voter: Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

You aren’t the only one who has HAD IT. I’ll be 60 this year and the only presidential candidate I didn’t hold my nose while voting for was Ronald Reagan. I wore a Goldwater button in 1964, but I was 12 years old.


4 posted on 01/26/2012 11:25:36 AM PST by dainbramaged (I lost my mantra around 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

5 posted on 01/26/2012 11:27:26 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

LOL, yep!
If Mittens is the candidate, Ubanga will be toasting himself.
And I will be hunkered down, doing what I can to protect my family while the ignorant chattering class goes out and votes for Obamney.
I will not be with them.


6 posted on 01/26/2012 11:31:24 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

If you always do what you always did the way you always done it, you will always get what you always got.....................


7 posted on 01/26/2012 11:31:28 AM PST by Red Badger (If you are unemployed long enough, you are no longer unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

In 1976, Republicans were being punished for Nixon and Ford’s pardon of Nixon. The Democrats could have put up a weak leader with poor ideas and still win, wait, they did do that.

In 1992, there was a populist little bugger from Texas with big ears named Perot who screwed things up. Not that Bush was perfect, but he did give us Clarence Thomas, a great Supreme pick.

In 1996, war hero Bob Dole, who literally gave his right arm for the country, took one on the chin for the Republicans because nobody was going to beat Clinton that year.

This is not to endorse Romney. It’s just pointing out additional information lacking in your original post.

I would prefer to see Wisconsin Governor Walker or Wisconsin Representaive Ryan in the race, but you can’t always get what you want.


8 posted on 01/26/2012 11:31:51 AM PST by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

NO to Romney, now and in the future. The GOP can just die for all I care now. Burn the republican party to the ground and stir up the ashes. It is cancer, desperately in need of surgical removal and thrown into the biohazard waste bin.


9 posted on 01/26/2012 11:34:32 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

I’m in my early 30’s and have NEVER had a candidate with some real balls to vote for as president.

I remember in High School seeing Dole in the Debates sound like a complete coot, barely able to keep awake.

W barely won in 2000, and that whole aftermath was a stressful nightmare for me. In 2004 still barely won. No election night victory.

2008 we nominate McCain....McCain?????? Why? Because he was in Vietnam? What a waste!

I’m sick of these elections being wastes with barely victories and jokes for nominees that couldn’t stand up to a beam of sunlight.

But here we are AGAIN! A sizable chunk of the electorate wanting to go again with Mitt based on NOTHING they can articulate! Frigging idiots!


10 posted on 01/26/2012 11:34:36 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Whatever. Obama wins anyway if Mitt is the nominee.


11 posted on 01/26/2012 11:37:04 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Know et al; All
And now in 2012, the Republican Party insiders, along with the liberal press are trying to once again pick our candidate..We lose either way

(And with a supreme LoserMan at that!)

Yup. Talk about forced feeding...and stampeding a loser into the top-ranks!

Romney is 0-for-17 in races away from his home turf! A complete loser! He won't be able to carry much beyond his home turf of New England, Michigan (where his daddy was gov), and Western Mormon states!

See for details: 'Mr. Electability?' SuperLoserMan Mitt not viable candidate...0-17 in 'road' races [Vanity]

12 posted on 01/26/2012 11:37:04 AM PST by Colofornian (If 94% of LDS repeat voting for Romney, then such RINO-voting reveals a liberal Mormon bent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

Hmmmmmmmmmmm

I just heard a radio ad for Newt

good they need to be on here

TN has early voting starting Jan 15...


13 posted on 01/26/2012 11:39:24 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

Using your example, a lot of Republicans did refuse to vote for moderate candidates. That’s why the Democrats won. I think we should extend that practice to include Republicans who won’t downsize government, even if they are for lower taxes. I’m also for boycotting Republicans who bash cultural conservatives and Christians. No telling who we will get, Obama, Gore, Kerry, maybe Barney Frank’s lover. At least we won’t get unsuitable Republicans.


14 posted on 01/26/2012 11:39:55 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
And just which candidate hasn't been labeled a "RINO" in the halls of Free Republic?

And this isn't "breaking news" or news of any kind.

15 posted on 01/26/2012 11:42:25 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
I would vote for Paris Hilton over Barack Obama.

I would vote for PEREZ Hilton over Barack Obama.

So if Willard gets the nomination, I'm voting for him.

Of course, he's not going to get the nomination.

16 posted on 01/26/2012 11:44:19 AM PST by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

a non-vote is a vote for Obama.

As Rush said,,,, Obama is a Marxist.

Newt and Mitt aren’t Marxists.....

We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting
Obama win again.


17 posted on 01/26/2012 11:45:44 AM PST by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

a non-vote is a vote for Obama.

As Rush said,,,, Obama is a Marxist.

Newt and Mitt aren’t Marxists.....

We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting
Obama win again.


18 posted on 01/26/2012 11:45:55 AM PST by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
If the GOPE wins and we get Romney as a candidate, I will not vote for him. I do not care if that means Obama gets reelected. A line in the sand MUST be drawn. I will join a third party. The Republican Party must be destroyed if we can't take it over. A third Conservative party WILL destroy the Republicans. BROKEN ARROW”
19 posted on 01/26/2012 11:47:46 AM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
a non-vote is a vote for Obama. As Rush said,,,, Obama is a Marxist. Newt and Mitt aren’t Marxists..... We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting Obama win again.

You're welcome.
20 posted on 01/26/2012 11:48:36 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

America will be destroyed if Obama wins again.


21 posted on 01/26/2012 11:48:57 AM PST by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

If we are going to have a gun grabbing socialist with no integrity in the Whitehouse, let it be a Democrat.

I will never vote for Romney. I’m finished with the lesser of two evils BS.


22 posted on 01/26/2012 11:50:03 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
It's too late for this cycle, but I feel that it's time the conservatives abandon the Republican Party and form one of our own. We will never wrench the power from the elite establishment.
We need to think of what our core issues should be, start the process now. What do you think .....
23 posted on 01/26/2012 11:50:26 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

A Romney nomination would have several lasting and serious repercussions.

A split of Conservatives/Tea Party away from the establishment GOP.

A third-party Tea Party candidate running in the fall.

The likelihood of an Obama second term on a 40% plurality.

The end of the GOP as they finish third.


24 posted on 01/26/2012 11:50:52 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

“Newt and Mitt aren’t Marxists.....

We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting
Obama win again.”

Mitt is a gun grabbing socialist. Go ahead and thank me. I would rather have the gun grabbing socialist in chief be a Democrat than a Republican.


25 posted on 01/26/2012 11:52:59 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting Obama win again.

“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.”

― Thomas Jefferson-

I don't agree the non-voters should be blackballed for staying home...some shouldn't be voting in the first place...others have a conscious and will not put their signiture supporting Romney....and most haven't a clue how dangerous Romney is to this nation...he will take us the same direction as Obama...only with another agenda in mind.... the only difference is he'll do so deceptively and you'll never know it til it hits you in the face. At least with Obama we know as he can't seem to hide his plays very well...Romney , on the other hand is a master sneak....he'll tell you one thing and do another and that right under your nose.

So no...I will also not vote for Romney...and any can call it a vote for Obama if they choose...but if Romeny gets it we're done anyway....and you can put on your "One World" Dancing shoes because Romney will haul butt to get us there fast....and all with convincingly saying it's good for Americans....

Romeny Quote:...."I believe in an America where millions of Americans believe in an America that’s the America millions of Americans believe in. That’s the America I love.”

and Mitt paid some guy to write this?????

26 posted on 01/26/2012 11:57:22 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Actually, I would be in favor of joining a new party called The Constitution Party. It would be able to integrate all Tea Partyers as this is essentially what the Tea Party is.

In starting a Constitution Party, it will be clear to everyone exactly what the Party stands for. The Republican Party will dissolve into the mish-mash it is now. The Democrat Party will be exactly what it is now - the Socialist Party.

When do we start?


27 posted on 01/26/2012 12:00:21 PM PST by veritas2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
Right there with you on this one veritas 2002.

Here was my rant on an earlier thread.

In 1981 when Reagan was shot I prayed he would live and not leave us with the abominable RINO Establishment GHWBush.

In 1988, I heard GHWBush say, "Read my lips" and thought, "Well, he learned something from Reagan."

But the RINO reverted to true form and abandoned conservatives with new taxes. Like a birthright being forfeited for a bowl of soup, he squandered the election for a "promise" from Democrats.

Considering the alternative was a total liberal Asshat (redundancy police notified) I held my nose and voted for him AND warned my friends they were electing Clinton if they threw their vote away on Pee-ROT!

So, in 1992 I held my nose and voted for GHWB...Clinton won and trashed the Constitution. BUT was countered by a man named Newt Gingrich.

In 1996 I held my nose and voted for Dole...Clinton won and continued trashing the Constitution. And continued to be countered by Newt Gingrich until the RINO Establishment stabbed Newt in the back.

In 2000 I held my nose and voted for GWB...and he barely beat a total jackass named Gore and then cozied up to Ted Kennedy with social programs.

In 2004 I held my nose and voted for GWB again...and he narrowly beat another total jackass named Kerry and wimped out on nearly every issue except National Security and in so doing foisted Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid into prominence.

And in 2008 I held my nose and voted for McCain...and Idi Obama won and trashed the Constitution.

Newsflash....I am NOT holding my nose anymore!

I am staying home and sending a message of Never Another RINO.

Well, what about the Congressional elections you might say.

Listen up!

Republicans control the House and haven't done SQUAT to stop the Idi Obama regime from running roughshod over the Constitution, and the Republican Senators act as if there is a Democrat super-majority in that chamber, so what good did it do to elect them to the majority in the House and increase their numbers in the Senate?

Anybody who wants my vote now...has to damn well earn it!

And after watching Mitt Romney "govern" Massachusetts and cozy up to the most liberal of Dems, he has a snowball's chance in Hell of convincing me to get off my ass and vote for him.

28 posted on 01/26/2012 12:00:23 PM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys=Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
America will be destroyed if Obama wins again.

It will also be destroyed if Romney gets in as well. That's just the fact.

29 posted on 01/26/2012 12:02:29 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
America will be destroyed if Obama wins again.

Yes, and it will probably get BITS ugly.

Bring it.

No Mitt! No Way!

30 posted on 01/26/2012 12:02:43 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
-- America will be destroyed if Obama wins again. --

The worst that happens would probably be a good thing, collapse of the federal government and ascension of the states to fill the vacuum.

I'm not buying that the GOP can avert what you propose will happen - in other words, America might well be destroyed anyway. The Republicans have shown darn good talent at increasing the debt and increasing the spending.

31 posted on 01/26/2012 12:10:22 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
As far as I can see, neither Romney nor Gingrich is a conservative. Romney's track record as a devotee of Big Government is clear and undisputed and I will not vote for him.

Gingrich has previously endorsed an individual mandate in health-care, lobbied in favor of Bush's expansion of Medicare Part D, and endorsed the environmentalist wet dream of a carbon cap-and-trade market. He seems to be back-tracking furiously on all of these at the moment, but that doesn't reassure me. I'd greatly prefer a candidate whose positions a few years ago were the same ones he's espousing now that he's running for president.
32 posted on 01/26/2012 12:12:02 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
I hope this does not mean you won't vote PERIOD!

Don't vote for Rino Romney but please consider voting down ticket for constitutional correct candidates down ticket. Even if the obamessiah wins, a constitutional congress can hold the line against an anti-american president and maybe we can take the next 4 years to build the constitutional party we desire.

33 posted on 01/26/2012 12:20:13 PM PST by Leofl (I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

Heck I’m ready to start too.. but don’t know how/where to start. (can’t organize my own garage)
But I’m a dam good “Do-er” when given a task


34 posted on 01/26/2012 12:21:01 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

I will not vote for Willard Romney.


35 posted on 01/26/2012 12:21:28 PM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

a non-vote is a vote for Obama. As Rush said,,,, Obama is a Marxist. Newt and Mitt aren’t Marxists..... We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting Obama win again.

I don’t give a flying fig what Rush or any of the other elites say. The only difference between willard and obozo, is the color of their skin.
I will not vote for that gun stealing, baby killing, gay loving, commie care azzwipe EVER!
THEIR IS NO DISTICTION BETWEEN THESE TWO MARXST!
Let the chips fall where they may...
After that it becomes “GOD’S WAR” against these sniveling little EVIL BASTARDS.

GO NEWT!!!!!
“If God be for us, who can be against us”


36 posted on 01/26/2012 12:22:23 PM PST by billys kid (Everything in Massachusetts is illegal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
I remember in High School seeing Dole in the Debates sound like a complete coot, barely able to keep awake.

That was Bob Dole before Viagra. He's still a coot, though.

37 posted on 01/26/2012 12:25:22 PM PST by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R

a non-vote is a vote for Obama. As Rush said,,,, Obama is a Marxist. Newt and Mitt aren’t Marxists..... We can thank all of those who don’t vote for letting Obama win again.

i agree with the above..................


38 posted on 01/26/2012 12:25:31 PM PST by tankrlm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Leofl

Let me clarify:
I will NOT vote for Romney no matter what.

I WILL vote for every other Republican on the ticket that is...

until the new Constitution Party is formed with:
1. Other disaffected Republicans
2. Conservatives
3. Tea Partyers
4. Independents
5. Libertarians


39 posted on 01/26/2012 12:26:38 PM PST by veritas2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
So nominate Newt.

When he loses, does he just become one more moderate loser, or do we finally see an end of posts like this with their shaky assumption that the more conservative candidate will always win?

40 posted on 01/26/2012 12:29:08 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

Libertarians????? like Ron Paul Libertarians?????
I’m not down for that...


41 posted on 01/26/2012 12:33:36 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: biggerten
In 1996, war hero Bob Dole, who literally gave his right arm for the country, took one on the chin for the Republicans because nobody was going to beat Clinton that year.

If Clinton were inevitable, then he would have reached more than 49% of the vote, which he didn't.

42 posted on 01/26/2012 12:37:36 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tankrlm

If Romney’s on the ticket, VOTE GRIDLOCK (Repubs in House/Senate, anybody-but-Romney for president). Gridlock hasn’t done too bad for the last year, except for the dumbass Repubs being fooled into letting the Dems cut the military. The government isn’t doing much except for what Obama thinks he can do with executive orders. That could lead to lawsuits against him. And those can be overturned by the next president in one day.

We can be sure that if Romney gets in and “tinkers” with Obamacare it’ll never go away. Another president in 4 years can still get rid of it if it remains Obama’s baby. If it’s overturned by the SC this year then I can’t think of any good reason Romney would be better than gridlock. I certainly don’t trust Romney to appoint conservative SC justices...that’s one thing RINOs always fail on. With Republicans in Congress, we at least have a chance to cut spending and shame Obama into signing it. Big-spending Repubs didn’t work out so well in the W era anyway.


43 posted on 01/26/2012 12:37:36 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I certainly agree with your list. Mitt Romney's nomination accomplishes the following:

1. provides the man who the fewest of the grassroots GOP base will vote for (let alone donate/work for) and thereby keeps the White House in Obama's hands

2. wipes out any down-ticket boosts to other GOP candidates

3. implodes the GOP in a Whig-reminiscent debacle

4. demoralizes the tea party movement

5. allows MSM/Democrat proxies to morally destroy the LDS during the general election.

Win, win, win, win and win. "Gee whiz, dad- that Alinsky fellow sure is smart," said Mitt Romney.

Mr. niteowl77

44 posted on 01/26/2012 12:40:04 PM PST by niteowl77 (Mitt Romney: the horse the GOP elite intends to ride into the abyss. Or is it the other way around?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002; All

How about the American Constitution party or “the American’s” for short...that way it will always be the “DemoPubs” vs’s the Americans! (We can do some Neuroleptic, thought thingy crap, too for once!”)


45 posted on 01/26/2012 12:41:00 PM PST by mdmathis6 (Christ came not to make man into God but to restore fellowship of the Godhead with man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002

I’m conservative I won’t be voting for liberaltarians.


46 posted on 01/26/2012 12:41:51 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002; Jim Robinson
I am 64 years old and I agree with you 100%.

Anyone telling me that if I don't support the selected (bought!!)RINO candidate means I am insuring Obama for another four years is pissing in the wind!!

I am amazed at the trusted (?) conservative voices who have so quickly embraced a moderate (left-leaning I might add): Coulter, Drudge, Fox News, Krauthammer, etc., etc., etc.

Thank you Jim Robinson, Fred Thompson and Rick Perry for standing up against the prevailing moderate winds...

Perhaps other "conservatives" will join you when the winds have died down and its safe once again to go into the boat.

47 posted on 01/26/2012 12:44:24 PM PST by The Citizen Soldier (America needs Gingrich in 2012 about as much as England needed Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biggerten

And Souter doesn’t cancel out Thomas? Because he literally does just that every time. Bush lost because he broke the “no new taxes” pledge.

People forget a 3rd party Republican ran in 1980 and Reagan still won, with less than 50% of the vote.

The Dems got trounced in the House by Newt in 1994. Why was Clinton suddenly a lock in 1996? Didn’t take long for Newt to get the country on the right track I guess.


48 posted on 01/26/2012 12:47:55 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002; My Favorite Headache; onyx; trisham; TheOldLady; DJ MacWoW; JoeProBono; RedMDer; ...

I absolutely will NOT vote for or support the abortionist/statist socialist healthcare pushing Mitt Romney under any circumstances whatsoever!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU

The elite GOP establishment can KMA!!

NO MORE RINOS!!

We are the resistance!!

Rebellion is ON!!

Go, Newt!!


49 posted on 01/26/2012 12:52:00 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

We need a guy like Ron Paul to lead us!


50 posted on 01/26/2012 12:53:14 PM PST by ichabod1 (Mr. Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson