Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Results Of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing In Georgia
WesternJournalism.com ^ | January 26, 2012 | Unknown

Posted on 01/26/2012 12:44:24 PM PST by jmaroneps37

Update: Dean Haskins at Obama Release Your Records is saying that the Judge is entering a default judgement against Obama because he did not appear.

This could mean that Obama might not appear on Georgia’s ballot, although the Obama administration will certainly appeal. Today was an important day in the fight for truth. Despite Obama’s no-show, today’s court proceedings could have a great affect on the eligibility movement as a whole.

A blow by blow of the entire court proceeding was made by Craig Andersen of the The National Patriot. His article is found below. We will be updating this page with a synopsis of what today’s proceedings mean for the entire Obama eligibility movement and what results we might see.

In the meantime, read the following blow by blow account: Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney Jablonski was a NO SHOW as of course was Obama…..

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: ballot; birthcertificate; bob152; certifigate; eligibility; ga; georgia; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamacitizenship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-121 next last
To: NEMDF
Could you post that one more time? ;-)
51 posted on 01/26/2012 2:09:17 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Castigar
"This needs to be done in Pennsylvania and Ohio!"

Obama and his inner circle are already freaking-out about the possibilities.

52 posted on 01/26/2012 2:13:45 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

“Could be one reason for the no-show: don’t win a fight that doesn’t matter.”

I can just here it. “Those rednecks down in Georgia will just look like idiots saying I’m not qualified. And they weren’t going to vote for me anyway. We STILL have 56 states where we are on the ballot!”


53 posted on 01/26/2012 2:16:48 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Anything Obama or his lawyers says in court beyond debasing the whole process for daring to ask questions, if it were true, would hurt his qualification case. If he showed up and pleaded the fifth, that would be admitting Obama is not qualified for the ballot and is hiding the truth.

Best to just stiff arm the judcial system because they know Republicans and the courts won’t do squat about it.
If the judge and SOS disqualify him from the ballot, he’ll appeal to a friendly judge who will claim that the President is qualified by virtue being the President.


54 posted on 01/26/2012 2:21:59 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: airborne

bfl


55 posted on 01/26/2012 2:24:02 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
IMHO This man is not a citizen of the USA. He will be shown to be an illegal alien.

There are many good reasons for wanting Barry to be outed as a fraud, more payback than I could have ever hoped for.

But before I die, I'm 76, I want to ask for forgiveness for hating this man and his filthy co-conspirators only after he has been totally shamed.

56 posted on 01/26/2012 2:30:37 PM PST by UncleSam (Why must someone else always make the final decisions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

WOW,sorry about that. I saw my computer in some frantic looping motion, wondered if it would multiple post. (at least it was a short post?)


57 posted on 01/26/2012 2:32:08 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

You don’t have OCD, do you? LOL.


58 posted on 01/26/2012 2:34:40 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: UncleSam

Once he is finally shown to not be eligible, a thorough review of every eligibility case should be done, and every judge that threw the case out instead of letting it be heard on it’s merits should be impeached. Unless legal procedures really did require the judge to throw it out.


59 posted on 01/26/2012 3:22:54 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: UncleSam

Once he is finally shown to not be eligible, a thorough review of every eligibility case should be done, and every judge that threw the case out instead of letting it be heard on it’s merits should be impeached. Unless legal procedures really did require the judge to throw it out.

That includes the Supreme court members who voted not to hear it.


60 posted on 01/26/2012 3:23:41 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Your attitude is why these criminals do what ever they want without ANY concerns for the rule of law or the Constitution.


61 posted on 01/26/2012 3:57:13 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver; NEMDF

re: they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.

Is this an attempt to “repeat a lie often enough, people will think it must be the truth”?

the Write in candidate in alaska was MORCOWSKY the RINO.
(yes i know i spelled it wrong, but that spelling on a ballot was approved.)


62 posted on 01/26/2012 3:58:04 PM PST by Buscador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

I shouldn’t have to put sarcasm in parentheses or indicate humor for the obvious.

However, in my personal opinion he should have been arrested (under criminal charges) a long time ago, tried for treason and shot. That is not sarcasm or humor.


63 posted on 01/26/2012 4:11:22 PM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA: Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Amen


64 posted on 01/26/2012 5:07:09 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry

Its a globalist thing, to think the supreme court could do that, I guess.


65 posted on 01/26/2012 6:28:28 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

obumpa


66 posted on 01/26/2012 6:35:23 PM PST by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry

Will the Supreme’s over-turn their prior ruling on natural born-citizen and merely require that a single parent be born in the United States?

Neither the Supremes nor Congress can change any law of the land stated in the Constitution, i.e. here, the natural born citizen requirement. The only means for changing the Constitution is by amendment - and that would be no easy trick. Simple example of why the “citizen parentS” must remain the criteria: if only one citizen parent was required, and Hugo Chavez married an american woman - their child could be president. With that basic premise, at every election the country would be at risk of one or both candidates having divided loyalty. That divided loyalty is what comes from being the child of one non-citizen - because the child is born citizenship in two countries, and that means the other country has a claim on you in many aspects. Most obvious: you could be called into military service by the other country.

The potential problems - and therefore the potential threat - of dual loyalty is precisely the reason the Founders required the president to be “natural born”: the fruit of two American citizens, and therefore without divided loyalty.

Our Founders were brilliant men!


67 posted on 01/26/2012 8:05:09 PM PST by GGMac ((lesson learned re Obie: parse every sentence, every word, every gesture, every photo))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
Is this type of suit happening in any other states?

Swensson is saying that the default judgment should include the exclusion of Obama from the Georgia ballot. He also said suits are occurring in many other states.

68 posted on 01/27/2012 1:33:44 AM PST by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Now, many people believe that Obama is a "Manchurian Candidate" out to destroy the United States as she exists. Could Obama be a "Manchurian Candidate" out to destroy the Democrat Party? Or is he a "Manchurian Candidate", who's going to miss his target? Or, if Obama is excluded from the State's ballots, will he go or attempt to do the "Full Mussolini" and dismiss Congress?

You can bet Obama's following this alot closer than his stooges in the DSM, who believe Obama.

Could Judge Malihi issue a judgment that yeah, this is all correct, but it's too late the American People voted Obama as President and that supersedes the Constitution? Judges have gone insane in this country. In Arizona, implementing Federal Law is illegal, while Sanctuary City's that refuse to implement Federal Law is not illegal.

69 posted on 01/27/2012 1:51:56 AM PST by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

My “attitude” is that the current system isn’t being used to keep judges in check and perhaps Gingrich has a point, that another route need be charted to cap these judges’ power.


70 posted on 01/27/2012 5:26:16 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GGMac

Other saying natural born citizen in the Constituion, the criteria is ABSENT. That is why the USSC had to develop the criteria in case law. Therefore, they, and they alone (absent legislation defining the criteria) can change it.

Two different issues here. The Constitution says Natural Born Citizen and may only be changed by Constitutional amendment. How Natural Born Citizen is defined CAN be changed by the USSC.


71 posted on 01/27/2012 6:07:23 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Not Romney - Not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: kjo

...and no medical records.


72 posted on 01/27/2012 6:15:24 AM PST by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

“RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.”

I’m a little curious about this. Weren’t there TWO different DNC documents? Why wouldn’t they contrast these two instead of contrasting with the RNC?


73 posted on 01/27/2012 7:41:20 AM PST by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
I don't know of other states. Seems that there was one (Arizona? Oklahoma?) where it was considered.

Obama's law suits against states are outrageous. It is the support for illegal aliens and the out of control judges that pose a greater danger to this country.

74 posted on 01/27/2012 8:08:40 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: knarf
zero's not alone in this ... pelousy is most assuredly complicit of conspiracy;

So, they showed where the papers from the RNC certified that our guy was eligible, but the one for Obama did not. That's damning but it would be more so to show a PREVIOUS one from the Dems where it did. Several of them even. That way you would see how/if the Dems changed their wording specifically for Obama.

75 posted on 01/27/2012 8:11:44 AM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB

The current ‘system’ has been corrupted by the globalists who flaunt defiance of the rule of law and the US Constitution at every turn.

They have, by corrupting our education system, erased the idea from the mind of American citizens that they have a DUTY to protect the Constitution.

Citizens are mere producers or consumers in the globalist view and have no power on their own to do anything.

Yet the Constitution vests Americans with the power to do everything to control their lives and government.

The ‘route’ change needs to happen in the minds of the American citizens who are abdicating their duty to the globalists.


76 posted on 01/27/2012 8:19:53 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
From what I'm reading... this case may be a little different from what we have expected.

The judge is an administrative law judge and apparently he issues not a ruling in this type of case, but a "recommendation" and then, the final decision as to whether Obama's name appears on the ballot rests with the Secretary of State.

The judge does not issue any true ruling that is binding on anybody and it's the Secretary of State who is subject to the political pressure involved regardless of what the judge does recommend.

Further, the failure to appear does not automatically result in a default judgement, the judge can still rule on "the facts" as he sees them, not necessarily default to ruling in the plaintiff's favor because the defendant failed to appear.

I am suspecting this one also will be swept aside without a true ruling on the merits of the case. But I hope I'm wrong

77 posted on 01/27/2012 12:14:09 PM PST by Lloyd227 (Class of 1998 (let's all help the Team McCain spider monkeys decide how to moderate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry
The Constitution does not define “Natural Born Citizen”

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a...

Does the Constitution define "all" or do we know what that means?
Does the Constitution define "legislative" or do we know what that means?
Does the Constitution define "Powers" or do we know what that means?
Does the Constitution define "herein" or do we know what that means?
Does the Constitution define "granted" or do we know what that means?
Does the Constitution define "vested" or do we know what that means?

The Constitution is written in plain English, in the vernacular of the day. Specific terms can be looked up in historic essays and textbooks.

Further clarification can be found in the Federalist Papers.

78 posted on 01/27/2012 5:52:07 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

You know, it just occurred to me. How did Obama win election to the State Senate and US Senate, he used dirty tricks to get candidates excluded from the ballot or forced them to withdraw. Now, it’s coming around again. I’d love to see Obama excluded from the ballot, it would serve him right.


79 posted on 01/28/2012 7:29:53 AM PST by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

It could have a snowball effect on the good citizens in other states.


80 posted on 01/28/2012 7:43:37 AM PST by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; LucyT; Red Steel; Danae; DiogenesLamp; Fantasywriter; null and void; freepersup
GA SOS Brian Kemp was just on the Rusy Humphries show a few moments ago. He says the next step is that the judge will render a initial decision in the case and then send it and supporting documentation over to Kemp for review. Then Brian Kemp will make a final decision based on the judge’s initial decision and the other supporting docs. That is how it will go down. As far as I know if the SOS says Barry does not meet the eligibility requirements then he is off the ballot.

Interesting, thanks for reporting that. Pinging a few names to GA Girl's report. First time I heard that the GA SOS will be receiving supporting documents.

81 posted on 01/28/2012 9:58:36 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; Brown Deer; mojitojoe; thecodont; rxsid
GA SOS Brian Kemp was just on the Rusy Humphries show a few moments ago. He says the next step is that the judge will render a initial decision in the case and then send it and supporting documentation over to Kemp for review. Then Brian Kemp will make a final decision based on the judge’s initial decision and the other supporting docs. That is how it will go down. As far as I know if the SOS says Barry does not meet the eligibility requirements then he is off the ballot.

Interesting, thanks for reporting that. Pinging a few names to GA Girl's report. First time I heard that the GA SOS will be receiving supporting documents.

Posting again with a few more names added.

82 posted on 01/28/2012 10:00:22 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thanks for the ping... that’s quite an all star roster ping you’ve compiled. I’m humbled by your consideration. I lack a classic pedigree but I will fight! ;o)


83 posted on 01/28/2012 10:12:30 AM PST by freepersup (Hi, I'm Michael Jablonski, and right about now my you know what is tighter than a tree's rings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: UncleSam

It’s good to hate evil, you’re fine.


84 posted on 01/28/2012 10:13:10 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER; Buckeye Battle Cry
>>> The Constitution does not define “Natural Born Citizen” <<<

>>> The Constitution is written in plain English, in the vernacular of the day. Specific terms can be looked up in historic essays and textbooks. <<<


85 posted on 01/28/2012 10:20:36 AM PST by freepersup (Hi, I'm Michael Jablonski, and right about now my you know what is tighter than a tree's rings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; Lloyd227

Lloyd, read GA Girl’s comment above.


86 posted on 01/28/2012 10:20:53 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freepersup

Hey, I’m just a stupid high school dropout trying to nip a few ankles when I can, and inform a few people I knew would be interested and pass the info along.

:-D


87 posted on 01/28/2012 10:23:12 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; little jeremiah

Bad news travels FAST- bad for Soebarkah that is! Thanks.

Reminder: Judge Malihi moved the date on which he ‘renders’ his decision, up from the 5th of Feb., to the 1st. KA-POW!


88 posted on 01/28/2012 10:30:23 AM PST by freepersup (Hi, I'm Michael Jablonski, and right about now my you know what is tighter than a tree's rings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

>>> I’m a little curious about this. Weren’t there TWO different DNC documents? Why wouldn’t they contrast these two instead of contrasting with the RNC? <<<

I’ll take the first question- I think (memory... where’s my memory) that two different DNC documents were submitted in Hawaii, because a gov. official there refused to sign the first one, as it may subject him to future criminal charges were he to be charged with malfeasance. Why malfeasance? The wording spoke to Soebarkah’s qualification as a Constitutionally qualified NBC, or something to that effect. He isn’t and the official knew it, or knew something else about Dear Leader that was rank, as in stank. The documents are easily accessible with a quick engine search.


89 posted on 01/28/2012 10:49:05 AM PST by freepersup (Hi, I'm Michael Jablonski, and right about now my you know what is tighter than a tree's rings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
No one, no matter how popular, no matter how colorful, has a right to appear on a ballot if they cannot prove they are eligible to hold office.

Ping

90 posted on 01/28/2012 10:50:41 AM PST by null and void (Day 1103 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
"Lloyd, read GA Girl’s comment above."

Thanks, I did read it, she's correct and that's kind of what I was saying

91 posted on 01/28/2012 10:51:52 AM PST by Lloyd227 (Class of 1998 (let's all help the Team McCain spider monkeys decide how to moderate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: knarf
(Nazi Pelousy) MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified."

the issue has arisen over the discovery that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed two different certifications of Obama's nomination as the Democratic candidate, one certification stating he was a natural born citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve as president a second one omitting the constitutional qualification language. The latter certification was sent to state election officials according to the Canada Free Press.

Nancy knew.

She signed a fraudulent document asserting he was Constitutionally qualified, then when she realized this made her guilty of both fraud and perjury, had it pulled back and reissued a document omitting any reference to Constitutional eligibility.

If there was ever a smoking gun in a treason trial, this would be it.


92 posted on 01/28/2012 11:02:24 AM PST by null and void (Day 1103 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB
hedgetrimmer ~ (USSC) judges can be impeached.

MrB ~ Theoretically. But the last time this happened? Was it... oh, yeah, NEVER.

When was the last time we knowing had a president who failed to meet them minimal Constitutional requirements to hold the job? Was it... oh, yeah, it was NEVER.

IOW, there is a first time for everything...

93 posted on 01/28/2012 11:13:10 AM PST by null and void (Day 1103 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Traitors are hanged.


94 posted on 01/28/2012 11:17:57 AM PST by null and void (Day 1103 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thanks for posting this. I know now that I was assuming that the SoS would have all the information. But I suppose that it could just as easily been that he was just to get the Judge’s yea or nay.

Thanks for posting this!


95 posted on 01/28/2012 11:27:25 AM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Danae; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; ...
If one were sufficiently motivated one could email the Georgia Secretary of State here with a word or two about supporting the U.S. Constitution, or something like that...
96 posted on 01/28/2012 11:34:51 AM PST by null and void (Day 1103 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: null and void
done .... for what it's worth .. I'm sure he's getting a lot of pressure from the dark side this weekend ... I expect him to fold

.

97 posted on 01/28/2012 11:39:27 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

The idea that GA is in play is absurd.


98 posted on 01/28/2012 11:45:28 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Exactly - there isn’t “precedence” for everything.


99 posted on 01/28/2012 11:57:06 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

All the more reason to give him moral support.


100 posted on 01/28/2012 12:07:37 PM PST by null and void (Day 1103 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson