Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waxman: (obsessive) GOP 'so stupid' to include Keystone pipeline in payroll tax package
The Hill ^ | 1/26/12 | Mike Lillis

Posted on 01/26/2012 4:50:38 PM PST by Libloather

Waxman: GOP 'so stupid' to include Keystone pipeline in payroll tax package
By Mike Lillis - 01/26/12 05:15 PM ET

A senior Democrat on the payroll tax conference panel had some strong words Thursday for Republicans hoping to attach Keystone pipeline language to the package.

"That is so stupid, already, for them to be pushing the Keystone pipeline issue in this bill, in this conference," Rep. Henry Waxman told reporters gathered near the Chesapeake Bay for the Democrats' annual caucus retreat. "The pipeline issue is one that the Republicans are obsessing over."

The California Democrat suggested that a provision forcing approval of the pipeline would alienate the Democrats on the panel and kill any shot at a bipartisan deal.

"Many of us believe that that pipeline will lock us into a 50 to 100 years of dependence on the dirtiest source of oil," said Waxman, the senior Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He characterized the GOP's Keystone provision as a "special interest earmark" with no business on the tax bill.

The fight over Keystone XL has reached a fever pitch this month after President Obama rejected TransCanada Corp.'s application to expand the pipeline from the oil sands of Alberta to refineries on the Gulf Coast.

The State Department said it didn't have time to analyze the environmental impact of the proposal because House Republicans put a 60-day time limit on the process. But Republicans – arguing the decision would prevent the creation of tens of thousands of jobs – have threatened to reverse the administration's decision as part of the payroll tax bill. That package also includes an extension of emergency unemployment insurance (UI) benefits and a pay hike for doctors who treat Medicare patients.

The members of the conference committee have until March 1 to iron out a deal.

"What they insisted on was that the president make a decision, and the president has made his decision," Waxman said. "He didn't have enough time to make a full evaluation without even yet knowing what the [pipeline] route is going to be … and the Republicans expected him to approve even without that basic piece of information."

Waxman listed three "red lines" he said would likely lead Democrats to oppose the tax package: a Keystone amendment, provisions limiting UI eligibility or language cutting Medicare benefits to pay for the increased payments to doctors who treat seniors.

GOP leaders are pushing for all three.

In their yearlong payroll tax extension bill, for instance, GOP leaders included a provision allowing states to require UI beneficiaries to pass drug tests and another forcing UI recipients without a high school education to enroll in GED programs.

Waxman rejected those changes, saying they're "all ideas [Republicans] have to make it harder for people to get help to pay for their living expenses when they don't have a job."

Although all sides back an extension of the three central pillars of the tax bill, Waxman warned there's "no guarantee this conference is going to be successful."

"I wouldn't be surprised if they [GOP leaders] scuttled this conference by holding us hostage to the way that they want to deny people benefits under programs for which they are already entitled to those benefits," he said.

Earlier in the day, two other Democrats on the conference committee – Reps. Chris Van Hollen (Md.) and Xavier Becerra (Calif.) – delivered a similar message, warning that extraneous provisions like Keystone would complicate the process and threaten the underlying bill.

"There is clear [bipartisan] agreement that the 20 of us want to get these three things done," Becerra told reporters in Cambridge, Md. "We should not let other things get in our way."

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: keystone; payroll; taxes; waxman
Has anyone sought Nostrolitis's advice on anything - like - ever?
1 posted on 01/26/2012 4:50:41 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I thought Henry the Waxman died! He’s been so quiet lately.

2 posted on 01/26/2012 4:52:31 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (For the first time in my adult life, I am ashamed of an American president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Only to Democrats can a project, which began engineering in 2008, and utilizes proved technology (crude from tar sands has been pump for many many years), be considered to require more study on possible adverse affects.
3 posted on 01/26/2012 5:05:08 PM PST by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Naw, he has been taking acting lessons for a part on ‘The Twilight Zone’ that he heard he would be a natural for.

4 posted on 01/26/2012 5:13:39 PM PST by biff (WAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: biff
he has been taking acting lessons for a part on ‘The Twilight Zone’ that he heard he would be a natural for.

That would make perfect sense because he's the Congressman the Tinseltown elite sends to Washington over and over again. His district includes Beverly Hills, Santa Monica and Malibu. He's been in Congress 36 years.

5 posted on 01/26/2012 5:27:27 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Waxman.... a sleazy, slimy, greasy, little mosquito
6 posted on 01/26/2012 6:16:42 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The truth is Henry Waxman IS as ugly as he looks..

By the way.. that pipeline would Go right by American Tars Sands and Shale.. Since Canadian tar sands produced the oil going thru the pipleine.. How long would it be before EVEN REPUBLICANS said WHY DON’T WE PRODUCE OIL FROM OUR TAR SANDS SINCE THERE IS MORE THAN IN CANADA?..

Could be “the reason” why Zerodamus rejected the pipeline..

7 posted on 01/26/2012 6:30:02 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Waxman doesn’t like the idea of the pipeline because those huge diameter pipes would be in direct competition with the size of his nostrils, which he is so proud of. (yukkkkkkk)

8 posted on 01/26/2012 6:50:59 PM PST by jmax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Waxman is a rabid Green and one of the leaders of Cap and Trade policies in the House. He is nuts for this crap. Fortunately he is failing. Even in the early Obama term when Democrats had the Government in a vise it was too much.

9 posted on 01/26/2012 7:42:13 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I blow my nose in his general direction.

10 posted on 01/26/2012 7:49:36 PM PST by rfp1234 (RFP's Law: Whoever blames Bush first shall lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson