Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Cannibals in GOP Establishment Employ Tactics of the Left
Sarah Palin's Facebook Page ^ | January 27, 2012 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 01/27/2012 3:18:48 PM PST by Timber Rattler

We have witnessed something very disturbing this week. The Republican establishment which fought Ronald Reagan in the 1970s and which continues to fight the grassroots Tea Party movement today has adopted the tactics of the left in using the media and the politics of personal destruction to attack an opponent.

We will look back on this week and realize that something changed. I have given numerous interviews wherein I espoused the benefits of thorough vetting during aggressive contested primary elections, but this week’s tactics aren’t what I meant. Those who claim allegiance to Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment should stop and think about where we are today. Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater, the fathers of the modern conservative movement, would be ashamed of us in this primary. Let me make clear that I have no problem with the routine rough and tumble of a heated campaign. As I said at the first Tea Party convention two years ago, I am in favor of contested primaries and healthy, pointed debate. They help focus candidates and the electorate. I have fought in tough and heated contested primaries myself. But what we have seen in Florida this week is beyond the pale. It was unprecedented in GOP primaries. I’ve seen it before – heck, I lived it before – but not in a GOP primary race.

I am sadly too familiar with these tactics because they were used against the GOP ticket in 2008. The left seeks to single someone out and destroy his or her record and reputation and family using the media as a channel to dump handpicked and half-baked campaign opposition research on the public. The difference in 2008 was that I was largely unknown to the American public, so they had no way of differentiating between the lies and the truth. All of it came at them at once as “facts” about me. But Newt Gingrich is known to us – both the good and the bad.

We know that Newt fought in the trenches during the Reagan Revolution. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out, Newt was among a handful of Republican Congressman who would regularly take to the House floor to defend Reagan at a time when conservatives didn’t have Fox News or talk radio or conservative blogs to give any balance to the liberal mainstream media. Newt actually came at Reagan’s administration “from the right” to remind Americans that freer markets and tougher national defense would win our future. But this week a few handpicked and selectively edited comments which Newt made during his 40-year career were used to claim that Newt was somehow anti-Reagan, and isn’t conservative enough to go against the accepted moderate in the primary race. (I know, it makes no sense, and the GOP establishment hopes you won’t stop and think about this nonsense. Mark Levin and others have shown the ridiculousness of this.) To add insult to injury, this “anti-Reagan” claim was made by a candidate who admitted to not even supporting or voting for Reagan. He actually was against the Reagan movement, donated to liberal candidates, and said he didn’t want to go back to the Reagan days. You can’t change history. We know that Newt Gingrich brought the Reagan Revolution into the 1990s. We know it because none other than Nancy Reagan herself announced this when she presented Newt with an award, telling us, “The dramatic movement of 1995 is an outgrowth of a much earlier crusade that goes back half a century. Barry Goldwater handed the torch to Ronnie, and in turn Ronnie turned that torch over to Newt and the Republican members of Congress to keep that dream alive.” As Rush and others pointed out, if Nancy Reagan had ever thought that Newt was in any way an opponent of her beloved husband, she would never have even appeared on a stage with him, let alone presented him with an award and said such kind things about him. Nor would Reagan’s son, Michael Reagan, have chosen to endorse Newt in this primary race. There are no two greater keepers of the Reagan legacy than Nancy and Michael Reagan. What we saw with this ridiculous opposition dump on Newt was nothing short of Stanlin-esque re-writing of history. It was Alinsky tactics at their worst.

But this whole thing isn’t really about Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney. It is about the GOP establishment vs. the Tea Party grassroots and independent Americans who are sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives with a complicit media egging it on. In fact, the establishment has been just as dismissive of Ron Paul and Rick Santorum. Newt is an imperfect vessel for Tea Party support, but in South Carolina the Tea Party chose to get behind him instead of the old guard’s choice. In response, the GOP establishment voices denounced South Carolinian voters with the same vitriol we usually see from the left when they spew hatred at everyday Americans “bitterly clinging” to their faith and their Second Amendment rights. The Tea Party was once again told to sit down and shut up and listen to the “wisdom” of their betters. We were reminded of the litany of Tea Party endorsed candidates in 2010 that didn’t win. Well, here’s a little newsflash to the establishment: without the Tea Party there would have been no historic 2010 victory at all.

I spoke up before the South Carolina primary to urge voters there to keep this primary going because I have great concern about the GOP establishment trying to anoint a candidate without the blessing of the grassroots and all the needed energy and resources we as commonsense constitutional conservatives could bring to the general election in order to defeat President Obama. Now, I respect Governor Romney and his success. But there are serious concerns about his record and whether as a politician he consistently applied conservative principles and how this impacts the agenda moving forward. The questions need answers now. That is why this primary should not be rushed to an end. We need to vet this. Pundits in the Beltway are gleefully proclaiming that this primary race is over after Florida, despite 46 states still not having chimed in. Well, perhaps it’s possible that it will come to a speedy end in just four days; but with these questions left unanswered, it will not have come to a satisfactory conclusion. Without this necessary vetting process, the unanswered question of Governor Romney’s conservative bona fides and the unanswered and false attacks on Newt Gingrich will hang in the air to demoralize many in the electorate. The Tea Party grassroots will certainly feel disenfranchised and disenchanted with the perceived orchestrated outcome from self-proclaimed movers and shakers trying to sew this all up. And, trust me, during the general election, Governor Romney’s statements and record in the private sector will be relentlessly parsed over by the opposition in excruciating detail to frighten off swing voters. This is why we need a fair primary that is not prematurely cut short by the GOP establishment using Alinsky tactics to kneecap Governor Romney’s chief rival.

As I said in my speech in Iowa last September, the challenge of this election is not simply to replace President Obama. The real challenge is who and what we will replace him with. It’s not enough to just change up the uniform. If we don’t change the team and the game plan, we won’t save our country. We truly need sudden and relentless reform in Washington to defend our republic, though it’s becoming clearer that the old guard wants anything but that. That is why we should all be concerned by the tactics employed by the establishment this week. We will not save our country by becoming like the left. And I question whether the GOP establishment would ever employ the same harsh tactics they used on Newt against Obama. I didn’t see it in 2008. Many of these same characters sat on their thumbs in ‘08 and let Obama escape unvetted. Oddly, they’re now using every available microscope and endoscope – along with rewriting history – in attempts to character assassinate anyone challenging their chosen one in their own party’s primary. So, one must ask, who are they really running against?

- Sarah Palin


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; bloodythursday; cannibals; drudge4romney; dsj; elections; florida; gingrich; gop; gope; newt; palin; romneyscum; romneyspew; sarahpalin; teaparty; teapartyrebellion; waronnewt; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 451-500 next last
To: stuck_in_new_orleans
Sarah talks alot for someone who dropped out.

I think it's a good thing when people who aren't in the race talk about it. All Americans should.

151 posted on 01/27/2012 5:05:18 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

 We owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Sarah, for articulating so eloquently what so many of us have been feeling. 
  It isn’t enough to just replace Obama. If we don’t replace him with someone with solid conservative principles, we will still be on the road to destruction. 
  Death by a shot to the head, or slow death by poison, the end result will be the same. 


152 posted on 01/27/2012 5:06:30 PM PST by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Don’t play stupid with me, Virginia Ridgerunner. You skulked back here under your new screen name like a sneak and coward, so that FReepers wouldn’t know your identity, while you posted a barrage of links against Newt Gingrich.

Now you’re backing off that tirade because?

You don’t want to get banned?

You’ve suddenly seen the light and you were wrong about Newt Gingrich?

Romney is worse?

Heretofore, I thought I read wherein you wouldn’t vote for either, that you would vote for ... drum roll ... Sarah Palin, so that begs the question, what the heck are you doing here?


153 posted on 01/27/2012 5:07:39 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans

The Giuliani liberal shows up again.


154 posted on 01/27/2012 5:09:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: time4good

Romney is turning out to be WORSE then Obama..yeah I said worse..because with Obama, yeah he’s a marxist far left progressive sack of poo, but he never lied about it, everyone knows what he is, he never really denied it(The ones who called him in 2008 a moderate were clearly lacking brain cells), but with Romney, he pretends to be a Conservative, knowing full well when he was running for Governor he called himself a “Progressive”(Heard him refer to himself as that on Mark Levin’s show yesterday) yet Republicans are STILL voting for this guy. I dont get it, I thought the GOP was against the progressive agenda or did I miss something here.


155 posted on 01/27/2012 5:09:19 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Good insight and slogan.


156 posted on 01/27/2012 5:09:37 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Sorry, I don’t know how to do that.


157 posted on 01/27/2012 5:10:03 PM PST by DanMiller (Dan Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

She said it again—we need to be sudden and relentless.


Yes we do.


158 posted on 01/27/2012 5:10:18 PM PST by txhurl ('We need to be sudden and relentless.' Save the canons for the whites of their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
I'd rather you "just hushed" for a long time.
159 posted on 01/27/2012 5:10:24 PM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Right on the money.

Thank you Sarah for telling it like it is.

And thank you Lord, for Sarah.

May God grant us strength, wisdom and courage.
Tatt


160 posted on 01/27/2012 5:10:45 PM PST by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Iron dog is a snow mobile. Todd has raced for years and won a couple of time. It follows a similar trail than the big famous dog sled race....BIG thing. Todd is a national Iron Dog Champion and has been for years.


161 posted on 01/27/2012 5:11:29 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

My my what could of been. Sarah Palin should be president and I hope one day she will be.


162 posted on 01/27/2012 5:11:59 PM PST by Clay+Iron_Times (Psalms 118:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones; Ron C.

Thanks Jedi for clearing that up. I knew something was off on that comment and after reading about Greta. Misinformation about conservative Sarah, who wudda thunk?


163 posted on 01/27/2012 5:14:09 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Wow, this is a very long piece for Palin -- usually she keeps her comments and articles much shorter. She must be TICKED OFF.

Godspeed Newt Gingrich.

164 posted on 01/27/2012 5:14:47 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I have similar memories. It was early in my political development. I had pretty much figured out where I stood, but I a) had difficulty fully articulating my views and b) felt somewhat isolated. I turned on my television, and there was El Rushbo........................


165 posted on 01/27/2012 5:16:18 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

Good God! Has there EVER been a woman that’s been more centered and consistent? I just love Sarah!


166 posted on 01/27/2012 5:17:07 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Yes, I believe that Sarah saw the GOP as too divided between establishment and conservative to be able to constructively vet all Republican candidates for a real leader.

This is why she didn't unload on the party elites that sabotaged her candidacy and expected to use her and then dump her. She didn't want to destructively divide the party, just nudge it toward the conservative, and free market capitalism.

With Sarah in the running, this infighting would be worse, not better, and anyone she endorses will have the sky fall on them, from both sides.

HOW to get these answers and/or how to get anyone to care.

I believe Sarah is trying to get the average Republican to force these questions by motivating individuals to make up their own minds by her NOT being specific, but always talking about the issues and tactics of the candidates, but endorsing none.

167 posted on 01/27/2012 5:17:22 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Newt “THE TORCH” Gingrich,,,Sarah adding fuel to the fire!!!


168 posted on 01/27/2012 5:18:10 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

I love that analogy, Georgia fan here. Actually, the Dawgs were down 15-0 when Herschel got in. It was all Herschel from there. Final: Georgia 16, Tenn. 15. Yes, Sarah could be our Herschel!


169 posted on 01/27/2012 5:18:24 PM PST by Proudcongal (NEWT/PERRY or NEWT/SANTORUM or NEWT/PALIN 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

“Can you imagine if Newt is the nominee and were to pick Sarah for his VP?”

From your typing fingers to God’s eyes and ears!!!!
Answered prayers happen!!!!


170 posted on 01/27/2012 5:18:24 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

http://www.moviewavs.com/0084356043/MP3S/Movies/O_Brother_Where_Art_Thou/swearat.mp3


171 posted on 01/27/2012 5:18:45 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Deb
“Iron Dog”? Is that a thing?

Wow.

Freepers know about it because it has been discussed here so many times, Todd Palin is a four time champion.

"Iron Dog,originally known as the Iron Dog Gold Rush Classic and later the Tesoro Iron Dog, is an off-road snowmobile race across Alaska. It normally starts on a Sunday in mid-February. At 1,971 miles (3,172 km), it is the longest snowmobile race in the world. The 2008 event featured a record forty teams competing for a $100,000 purse, with $25,000 awarded to the winners. The race attracted worldwide attention in 2008, when 4-time winner Todd Palin's wife Sarah contested the vice presidency of the United States."

172 posted on 01/27/2012 5:18:50 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
Wouldn’t mind if she just hushed for a few years.

I feel the same about you.

173 posted on 01/27/2012 5:20:00 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Ireland (U2) had “Sunday, Bloody Sunday”,,,Patriots have “Thursday, Bloody Thursday”!


174 posted on 01/27/2012 5:20:40 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

Thank You Sarah for being on our side! Go Newt!


175 posted on 01/27/2012 5:20:53 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
Absolutely, yes.

Probably more so than any who've not been through the same fire themselves.

176 posted on 01/27/2012 5:21:03 PM PST by b9 (NEWT all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Deb

I think Rush is a wise man and he may have read some of the posts here that were very angry with him for his treatment of Newt in recent days...he OWES his listeners to come clean.


177 posted on 01/27/2012 5:22:20 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Finally hear someone who heard Rush the way I did. What’s with these people calling him establishment?


178 posted on 01/27/2012 5:22:30 PM PST by GrannyK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Deb

I think Rush is a wise man and he may have read some of the posts here that were very angry with him for his treatment of Newt in recent days...he OWES his listeners to come clean.


179 posted on 01/27/2012 5:22:37 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: onyx
People really need to read Sarah's statement.
Nothing but the reality of the situation there.
180 posted on 01/27/2012 5:24:51 PM PST by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Newt, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

If Mitt is the nominee, Obama wins anyway, and even if Romney does win, it will only make it that much harder to loosen to elites grip on the GOP.


181 posted on 01/27/2012 5:25:12 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“t isn’t absurd at all, on thread after thread for two days you will have been reading about Rush’s great betrayal of his audience, as he even mocked us, he was enjoying what he was doing to Newt yesterday.

Rush is and was in 2008, a Romney man, what we learned yesterday, is that Rush is a Romney TYPE man as well.

Perhaps you lay on some defense of Drudge while you are at it.”

Amen! DRUDGE and RUSH have FOREVER (as in eternally) lost my trust! They can forget about this one little tiny viewer/listener/reader. Everything they have EVER said is now suspect to me..they are OLD NEWS to be thrown out with yesterday’s garbage! We need more people like SARAH!


182 posted on 01/27/2012 5:25:35 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
The left seeks to single someone out and destroy his or her record and reputation and family using the media as a channel to dump handpicked and half-baked campaign opposition research on the public.

This is EXACTLY how I've felt the past few days. Romney is using Obama's playbook. If he gets the nomination, I'm going to laugh my ass off when Obama uses it against him.

183 posted on 01/27/2012 5:28:21 PM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

She took a great deal of care in her composition. It’s excellent.


184 posted on 01/27/2012 5:31:29 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; onyx
onyx: "What a fraud you are. Second FReeper name and your previous slanderous posts against Newt and calling Sarah Palin a quitter.

Pffffft.

Timber Rattler: "Jealous?"

@onyx: A boy and his Photoshop have had a few spare moments lately. I'd like to present you with a new toy.


185 posted on 01/27/2012 5:33:06 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

YES!


186 posted on 01/27/2012 5:33:26 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

If they throw this Election I say to Hell with the Republicans, they will have gone the way of the Whigs, and we will start our own party (but won’t that mean Democrat Victories) I say it sure as hell ain’t making much of a difference now anyways!


God bless you sir.


187 posted on 01/27/2012 5:33:26 PM PST by Grunthor (I don't vote for Democrats, this includes Mitt Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Yes

First Dude would do well w/the true Floridians up north in the state and the “blue hairs” down in snowbird-land would be charmed, I am sure. Newt and First Dude could sweep FL like a Seminole Wind ...from the Okeechobee; all the way up to Micanopy.” (w/my apologies to John Anderson)

188 posted on 01/27/2012 5:34:23 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Read some of the Rush transcript for today and yes, he was all over Romney on healthcare and he did defend Newt.
also Rush said that it was ABC news the YOUNG Gingrich blasted and it that Eliot Abrams was spoon fed by the gop establishment!


189 posted on 01/27/2012 5:35:58 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Rush hurt himself permanently yesterday, he will never be taken at face value again, by many conservatives.”

Count me as one of those conservatives! Everything he says from here on out will be SUSPECT that he is only in it for Rush and for the ratings. Period. Someone as knowledgeable as Rush made a CONSCIOUS AND DELIBERATE decision yesterday “Bloody Thursday” and I will not forget it.


190 posted on 01/27/2012 5:36:26 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All
Click


GO NEWT!!!
GO FREE REPUBLIC!!!

191 posted on 01/27/2012 5:37:42 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: arasina

“To: stuck_in_new_orleans
I’d rather you “just hushed” for a long time. “

Amen Arasina!


192 posted on 01/27/2012 5:39:29 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I pray my state doesn’t disappoint, but I fear the worst. Don’t blame the natives if it goes bad. We have so many yanks who screwed up their states then came down here to do the same to us.


193 posted on 01/27/2012 5:40:18 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

Thank goodness they’re “stuck in new orleans” and won’t be voting Tuesday :)


194 posted on 01/27/2012 5:41:02 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Read the posts here; its crazy.

Right. And voting for a Republican who betrays every single principle of conservatism because "he's not Obama" is sane?

THINK. Don't knee-jerk, don't panic. Stop and think it through.

If Romney got the White House, we'd have a Republican Obama in the Oval Office, which means that limited government conservative Republicans would be made impotent in uniting and fighting the statism he'd certainly impose on We the People. It is absolutely, 100 percent certain that Romney would make liberalism more powerful in both parties. One hundred percent certain.

If Obama got the White House, this nation might not survive another four years, but then again, maybe it would -- indeed, the "Bbbbbbut we can't survie another four years of Obama!" is an example of blind hysteria, and hysterical people make stupid moves. If Obama got the White House, it is 100 percent certain that limited government conservatism in the GOP would grow stronger. Whether or not it would be in time to save the nation is uncertain, but there's a decent chance it WOULD be in time.

Risk is the price you pay for opportunity. There is ZERO risk in a Romney presidency -- ZILCH. Therefore, he presents ZERO opportunity for fighting the enemy -- statism -- that is destroying this country.

Hysterical people think anyone who isn't just as hysterical as they are is "crazy." It's true in regular life, and it is equally true in politics.

Hysteria and panic lead to bad moves and defeat. Courage -- and by God, for any of us to stand in the booth and refrain from voting for Romney would take a HELL of a lot more courage than rolling over and voting for him -- COURAGE leads to the path of victory. Rejecting Romney is the ONLY way to victory.

195 posted on 01/27/2012 5:41:49 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

“Read some of the Rush transcript for today and yes, he was all over Romney on healthcare and he did defend Newt.
also Rush said that it was ABC news the YOUNG Gingrich blasted and it that Eliot Abrams was spoon fed by the gop establishment!”

My question to Rush then is,,why didn’t he do his homework and say all this on “Bloody Thursday”? Why? Nothing changed between yesterday and today,,,he is only, and I mean ONLY doing damage control.


196 posted on 01/27/2012 5:42:26 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Read this excerpt from Sarah's article. NO way she endorses Romney! "I have great concern about the GOP establishment trying to anoint a candidate without the blessing of the grassroots and all the needed energy and resources we as commonsense constitutional conservatives could bring to the general election in order to defeat President Obama. Now, I respect Governor Romney and his success. But there are serious concerns about his record and whether as a politician he consistently applied conservative principles and how this impacts the agenda moving forward. The questions need answers now. That is why this primary should not be rushed to an end. We need to vet this. Pundits in the Beltway are gleefully proclaiming that this primary race is over after Florida, despite 46 states still not having chimed in. Well, perhaps it’s possible that it will come to a speedy end in just four days; but with these questions left unanswered, it will not have come to a satisfactory conclusion. Without this necessary vetting process, the unanswered question of Governor Romney’s conservative bona fides and the unanswered and false attacks on Newt Gingrich will hang in the air to demoralize many in the electorate. The Tea Party grassroots will certainly feel disenfranchised and disenchanted with the perceived orchestrated outcome from self-proclaimed movers and shakers trying to sew this all up. And, trust me, during the general election, Governor Romney’s statements and record in the private sector will be relentlessly parsed over by the opposition in excruciating detail to frighten off swing voters. This is why we need a fair primary that is not prematurely cut short by the GOP establishment usingALINKSY tactics to kneecap Governor Romney’s chief rival.
197 posted on 01/27/2012 5:42:55 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Names. I want names.

Hugh Hewitt. Michael Medved.

198 posted on 01/27/2012 5:43:24 PM PST by bkopto (Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I didn’t hear that, and I listen daily.

He was not dumping on Newt.

It must be getting awful crowded under your imaginary bus.


199 posted on 01/27/2012 5:43:47 PM PST by Yankee (ANNOY THE RNC AND THE MEDIA: NOMINATE NEWT GINGRICH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . . Good article by Sarah.

Thanks, hm.

200 posted on 01/27/2012 5:44:35 PM PST by LucyT ( NB. ~ Pakistan was NOT on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 451-500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson