Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Cannibals in GOP Establishment Employ Tactics of the Left
Sarah Palin's Facebook Page ^ | January 27, 2012 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 01/27/2012 3:18:48 PM PST by Timber Rattler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450451-500 last
To: fightinJAG
My whole point on this thread has been to offer up some ideas on how Gingrich can gain support, and how simply hoping and pining for the media to vet Romney is a waste of time (which you, yourself, admitted).

NO I didn't - you not getting any credibility by including me in what you said! Don't try that w/my post!

Mitt hasn't been vetted - what's this about 'further' vetting? LOL!

It's the same old tactic - the media is covering their POS candidate and the GOP E are doing the same and trashing his opponent. Same s**t, different election. And you saying Sarah words are flawed or didn't go far enough are bogus - step down off your high horse because you didn't offer up any new brilliant idea - trust me! LOL!

You think these politicians backing him don't know the POS mitt is? Sure they do but they endorse for their political advantage. You see - it is EVIL we are fighting here - Evil trying to suppress truth. And we'll see, if voters are more attracted to evil or truth. A different strategy doesn't change what reigns in the voters heart - evil or truth.

If voters didn't run from him and his romneycare - well, one can imagine how deceived they are already - BIG TIME deceived. He really shouldn't even be a R race or kicked out after the first debate. But when Perry and Santorum brought it up in the debates, they were trounced on by MB, another one of mitt's flukes. And Cain stayed neutral. So much for those faux conservatives. With 'real' conservatives in the race, mitt wouldn't be a subject right now.

So, I don’t know how many times I have to say this for you, by IMO Newt needs to make everything that comes out of his mouth, including how he debunks unfounded negative attacks, relate back to his ability to defeat Obama.

Don't say it anymore - once was enough to debunk it! Newt's ability to defeat Barry has already on display - it's ALREADY been done! Now how is your Mitt going to do it - he doesn't even have to open his mouth - his record shows he can't. They are as parallel as one can be - no one else has romneycare but him! And that's just for starters. So forget talking about what Newt should - he already has.

What you should be addressing - 'it's impossible for Mitt to beat barry'. But that isn't even the biggie - it's WHO will turn America around? Mitt will not - he doesn't even know enough about America except he made it in America. And Romneycare is NOT the mindset that will restore our country. So mitt fails the litmus tests on two accounts - too parallel to barry - he'll be squashed and a mindset that cannot restore but destroy!

Newt is the PATRIOT, historian and lover of America, the visionary for America. And he will take on the judges who have been tampering with it along with the federal reserve.

451 posted on 01/28/2012 11:42:23 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

FUMR?

I’ve missed knowing this ...


452 posted on 01/28/2012 11:46:09 AM PST by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

That’s it. This should throw the Palin voters entirely to Newt.

If not, they are not paying attention.


453 posted on 01/28/2012 12:06:53 PM PST by Warthog-2 (Character Counts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I’m wondering if Sarah would run for VP again if Newt asks her to.


454 posted on 01/28/2012 12:11:52 PM PST by Warthog-2 (Character Counts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Warthog-2
Palin needs to get to Florida before tomorrow, and start rallies for Newt! Otherwise, she is just pandering for hits on her website.

She either puts her (and our) money where her mouth is, to take down Romney. If Santorum refuses to wise up and show some brains for a change and drop out before Tuesday, then we need some other kind of miracle to win.

If Newt can't win Florida, it will be over for our side.

455 posted on 01/28/2012 12:14:14 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Yes, Palin should put her money where her mouth is, and actually show up for Newt.

(Some are using her contract with FOX as an excuse to stay away from Newt rallies.)


456 posted on 01/28/2012 12:27:34 PM PST by Warthog-2 (Character Counts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The only solution to this impasse is via the congressional elections. We can't stop turncoats like McCain and Beck and Dole from shooting off their mouths, but we sure as hell can throw their like-minded bums out of Congress and replace them with conservatives.

The way its shaping up, those elections may be more critical than a slimey Romney win. Let the Tea Party begin to stir...

457 posted on 01/28/2012 12:29:36 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
If you believe what you just said you need medical help quickly. Your brain died overnight and you haven't had the damn sense to fall over yet.
458 posted on 01/28/2012 12:33:37 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
A Romney presidency will be an utter disaster!

You think I don't know that?

459 posted on 01/28/2012 12:57:19 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
It is obvious that you are simply here to disrupt and spread anti-Newt propaganda.

Thank you for re-confirming my original point. Lots of "groupthink" going on around here these days, and apparently if you dissent from it, then you are labeled a propagandist.

And please tell me how posting factual information about Gingrich's recent record, AS PREVIOUSLY POSTED AND DISCUSSED HERE ON FREE REPUBLIC, amounts to "propaganda" and "disruption?"

As I said, I'm writing in Sarah Palin's name and will sleep peacefully with a clear conscience.

460 posted on 01/28/2012 1:02:12 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator
You are selectively ignorant about Newt's actual record and you spread crass rhetoric and demagoguery, claiming to be an authority on a subject you know nothing about. Jim Robinson himself, has denounced your so called “factual information” and yes, by all means, you are a propagandist and a disruptor.
461 posted on 01/28/2012 1:10:55 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Read on through the thread, and other FR threads, read post 242, we long time Rush listeners know what Rush was doing.


462 posted on 01/28/2012 1:11:41 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Pissant used to post them all the time.

Pissant's long gone and comparing my stand for principled Conservatism and his rabid PDS is disingenuous at best, and dishonest at worst. I supported Palin with everything I had. He hated her to the core. Big difference.

Sure you did - and your anti-Newt posts show how much you detest Mitt.

Oh, if one detests Romney, then he should automatically love Newt? Sorry but that makes no sense. I consider them both to be two sides of the same coin, and am not buying into his very recent conversion to red meat Conservatism. His record from 1998 through August 2011 is one that we were all ridiculing up until the time that Palin announced that she was not running.

And it's also clear that there is a lof of this going around when it comes to Newt and his RECENT, post-Speaker record:


463 posted on 01/28/2012 1:16:25 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; wardaddy
Thanks, but sadly. It is with sadness I wonder if there is room in this GOP to elect a good conservative President anymore. Conservatives are supposed to shut up and vote for the next chosen one.

I used to snicker a bit when I saw posts made by some freepers talking about a third party. However, after this past week, and the coordinated shenanigans pulled from multiple directions, I don't think I can snicker anymore. If your own party establishment teams up with the opposition and pulls the rug from under your feet, what can a candidate do?

Good, talented, conservative leaders with nice families would not want their families dragged through the mud to the point of almost destroying those families.

464 posted on 01/28/2012 1:16:31 PM PST by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: Warthog-2
Has Newt invited/requested Sarah Palin to come and campaign with him? Someone of Sarah's stature does not simply go down there uninvited. If Newt's people say thanks but no thanks, that will be picked up by the MSM and played for a very long time. It will be bad for both Newt and Sarah.

Moreover, I think Sarah wants this primary process to carry on for a while. She may be for Newt, but from what I have heard from her, she feels that a lengthy hard fought primary will only strengthen the Newt campaign for what is coming up later.

465 posted on 01/28/2012 1:24:36 PM PST by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
To devote all this passionate posting to getting us not to vote for Romney’s opponent is a strange passion, not exactly typical of how political primary passions run among conservative primary activists.

Really, then how come we see incessant attacks against us "purists" for always upsetting the apple cart in our demands for ideological consistency in our candidates?

Personally, at this point I don't care who votes for Newt since (like I said before), I consider him and Romney to be two sides of the same coin. Never again will I ever hold my nose and vote for a lesser evil, and this time around, I will be writing in Palin's name with a clear conscience. You used to feel that way too, old FRiend, so what happened?

You say that you have already decided to lay low and not vote for either of them, fine, now move along and lets us deal with the primary among ourselves as we fight to defeat Romney and advance newt Gingrich.

Oh, so sit down and shut up? Is that it? Is that what Sarah was advocating? Is that what FR has become?

466 posted on 01/28/2012 1:25:28 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
You are selectively ignorant about Newt's actual record and you spread crass rhetoric and demagoguery, claiming to be an authority on a subject you know nothing about.

How can it be considered selectively ignorant, crass rhetoric, and demagoguery when the stories I've posted are those PREVIOUSLY POSTED AND DISCUSSED ON FR, including by yourself, during a four month period last summer in which we were all ridiculing Newt, his pandering, and his backstabbing of Conservatives.

Remember NY 23? "Right Wing Social Engineering?" "Green Conservatism?" "Following Obama on Libya?" Are you saying that none of that happened, and those FR discussions and ridicule never took place?

By the way, don't you find it ironic that you're hurling those kinds of accusations against me when you were one of the very worst of the PDS'ers who jumped on the Perry bandwagon and then just as quickly jumped off?

467 posted on 01/28/2012 1:38:05 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Palin needs to get to Florida before tomorrow, and start rallies for Newt!

Now why would you want that to happen? You used to say that she did not matter, was an "ignorant populist", and her own worst enemy?

468 posted on 01/28/2012 1:45:51 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
...and yes, by all means, you are a propagandist and a disruptor.

And I guess that you fail to see the irony in that statement as well.

"Keep on shooting insults with those who don't agree with you. That will surely guarantee your candidate a win."

And I'm curious---did your oil company actually give that big "six-figure donation" to Perry that you were bragging about?

469 posted on 01/28/2012 1:57:34 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Romneybot it is then.

The Palins endorsed Newt, yet he is who you are devoted to stopping.

You Romney guys are a plague, no matter what clothes you pretend to wear.


470 posted on 01/28/2012 2:01:17 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
if one detests Romney, then he should automatically love Newt? Sorry but that makes no sense.

Right! It's doesn't but you are the one who said it, not me. I'll put that in a Mitt 'lack of sense' comment column from you. He must be rubbing off on you in a big way - the same dumb*** comments ala My conservatism is I'm married 'x' years and I have 5 children and 'x' grandchildren. This guy must be an embarrassment even to his rino and liberal friends as he is dumb as rocks.

I supported Palin with everything I had. He hated her to the core. Big difference

No there isn't because IF you would stay focused or perhaps deliberately wandering off...we were discussing you patting yourself on the back for the FIRST one to post this Sarah thread. I said so did pissant so it proved nothing. The haters do the same, so that can put you in the same category. So all your rant with everything I had was unnecessary. It proves nothing. You used it as a platform to trash Newt because Sarah threads gets the action.

I believe I gave you a homework assignment - let's see how much you detest mitt - gets some posts going and make them double the amount of your hateful posts on Newt. It's called put up or shut up time. You should know, you can't pull crapola here. For everyone that calls you on it there are probably 100 or more ignoring you and hateful posts towards a Great America, Great Patriot, Great Visionary, Newt, the BEARER of the REAGAN TORCH. Shame on you!

471 posted on 01/28/2012 2:09:42 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

“Never again will I ever hold my nose and vote for a lesser evil, and this time around, I will be writing in Palin’s name with a clear conscience. You used to feel that way too, old FRiend, so what happened?”


By the way, your old friend bit seems confused.

My goal is to stop Mitt Romney.

Don’t try to create a lie for me. I have had an unchanging position for at least a little more than five years, or whenever we first were introduced to Romney, which is vote AGAINST Romney, DO NOT REFUSE TO VOTE AGAINST HIM.

Wanting to stop Romney is why you Romney pushers annoy me.


472 posted on 01/28/2012 2:09:49 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

makes sense.


473 posted on 01/28/2012 3:12:33 PM PST by Warthog-2 (Character Counts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
You Romney guys are a plague, no matter what clothes you pretend to wear.

There you go calling me a "Romney guy" again when I'm not. I'm just refusing to hold my nose again and vote for a lesser evil. I stand on Conservative principles, but clearly there are many here who are now willing to sacrifice them for short term expediency despite past statements to the contrary.

Let me re-direct you to the real point in Sarah's piece, which is the same point I'm making:

But this whole thing isn’t really about Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney. It is about the GOP establishment vs. the Tea Party grassroots and independent Americans who are sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives with a complicit media egging it on.

Do you not understand that????

474 posted on 01/28/2012 4:17:48 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; Diogenesis
I believe I gave you a homework assignment - let's see how much you detest mitt - gets some posts going and make them double the amount of your hateful posts on Newt.

Heh...been there done that...they're now part of Diogenesis' comprehensive truth file on Romney that we started compiling way back in 2007. If you wish, he can repost it yet again to satisfy your homework assignment.

475 posted on 01/28/2012 4:21:57 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I agree with everyone else, your “lesser evil” is Mitt Romney’s only opponent, romneybot.

Do you realize how many of you concern trolls are using the same exact tact to keep posting in Romney’s behalf, against his only challenger.


476 posted on 01/28/2012 4:38:12 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

But in 2012, you are here trolling as a Romney troll.

You’ve come a long way baby.


477 posted on 01/28/2012 4:40:53 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
But in 2012, you are here trolling as a Romney troll.

The groupthink mentality being demonstrated here is simply astounding. Nay, appalling. This is supposed to be FR, not KOS.

478 posted on 01/28/2012 4:45:54 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; Jim Robinson
The groupthink mentality being demonstrated here is simply astounding. Nay, appalling. This is supposed to be FR, not KOS.

Tell it to JR, not to me, do your Romney bit for someone else, and preferably not on the Gingrich threads.

479 posted on 01/28/2012 4:51:22 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Nope. I know about your candidate all to well. So you don’t have the vim and vigor for any anti-Mitt posts you claim to detest but lots of energy to post anti-Newt posts. Gotcha!


480 posted on 01/28/2012 4:52:56 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Conform and vote for the lesser evil or else, is that it?


481 posted on 01/28/2012 4:54:50 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
groupthink mentality

There are only three candidates - one is a POS liberal, one a PATRIOT and VISIONARY and a BEARER of THE REAGAN TORCH, and one candidate hanging on.

Are you PO'd that we are all conservative patriots here? This is FR and not KOS, remember?

You rino's are of the groupthink mentality - 'Bloody Thursday' - all groupthink idiots reporting for duty.

482 posted on 01/28/2012 5:00:44 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

You could do as we have asked, just go away and quit fighting for Mitt Romney.


483 posted on 01/28/2012 5:03:46 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Are you PO'd that we are all conservative patriots here?

No, I'm PO'd that the corrupt, decrepit, backstabbing GOP-E has left us with such a miserable field of candidates from which to choose (or not choose, as the case may be).

And I'm also forever PO'd at THIS:

Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

484 posted on 01/28/2012 5:06:41 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
You could do as we have asked, just go away and quit fighting for Mitt Romney.

I'm not fighting for the detestable Mitt Romney. I'm fighting the corrupt GOP-E. Period.

485 posted on 01/28/2012 5:10:26 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Romney would be in deep approval of your method, since it consists solely of stopping Romney’s only opponent.

You are as phony as a three dollar bill, you should be embarrassed at this childish pretense.


486 posted on 01/28/2012 5:17:23 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Well, you can always change the channel. I’m sure as hell not going to change.


487 posted on 01/28/2012 5:17:53 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Romney would be in deep approval of your method, since it consists solely of stopping Romney’s only opponent.

When you hold your nose and vote for a lesser evil, you still end up with evil.

Never again.

488 posted on 01/28/2012 5:24:36 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: Moorings; wardaddy

Please don’t be so downhearted....yet.

I trust Rush. He will tell us when it’s time to panic.

/mind numbed robot ;o)


489 posted on 01/29/2012 12:04:18 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help you if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
and how simply hoping and pining for the media to vet Romney is a waste of time (which you, yourself, admitted).

NO I didn't - you not getting any credibility by including me in what you said! Don't try that w/my post!

You wrote:

Clue-the media won’t allow Mitt to be vetted, just like Barry.

I took that to mean that you thought the media won't allow Mitt to be vetted. Which reasonably means that hoping and pining for the media to vet Mitt is a waste of time.

Do you or do you not think that the media will vet Mitt?

If your answer is no, do you or do you not think hoping and pining for something that you think will never happen is a waste of time?

Thanks.

490 posted on 01/29/2012 3:19:35 AM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Did you think that observation was a criticism of Palin? That she is younger than I? It was certainly not meant as a criticism. Good grief.


491 posted on 01/29/2012 5:14:41 PM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Finny; All

Finny, so sorry for the late reply : / but am finally ready to catch up after a whirlwind weekend away from the comp : o

And, oh my gosh, thank you so much for the kind words!

Like you, I truly do consider it every bit an honor to be able to stand with so many good people here who; unbeknownst to others; also just so happen to be great patriots when their country calls.

I am especially glad to have been able to communicate that heartfelt pride to you all.

Take care my FRiend(s), and may God strengthen each of us for the fight.
Tatt


492 posted on 01/30/2012 11:27:44 AM PST by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I know Todd’s pretty legendary dog-sled racer, I just didn’t know there was one called the “Iron Dog”. I wanna T-shirt.


493 posted on 01/30/2012 1:23:47 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

I think Rush is a Santorum guy.


494 posted on 01/30/2012 1:25:02 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

You misread my post #106. I said Sarah might be lured into endorsing Newt because of Romney’s nasty tactics. Which is what she did today.


495 posted on 01/30/2012 1:32:46 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

Let’s try again. On the 27th, I said, “today”. Your argument referenced “yesterday”. See? We’re talking about two different days. You were talking about the 26th, which was as you say, and I was talking about the 27th, where Rush did a complete turnaround.


496 posted on 01/30/2012 1:37:42 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Deb


497 posted on 01/30/2012 2:37:36 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

et tu?


498 posted on 01/30/2012 2:55:53 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
OMG, Becky!!! The interweb is so slow today, I'm gonna SCREAM!

That T-shirt would have looked great with my green sweater (sniff).

499 posted on 01/30/2012 3:01:59 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun

Why yes, yes I did.


500 posted on 01/30/2012 7:25:33 PM PST by itsahoot (Killing humans can't be immoral else pulling weeds from the garden would be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450451-500 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson