Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monorprise

There are actually some really, really good companies out there for accurate food labeling. ConAgra, Unilever, and so on. And then, there are some who are so-so, and some who seem to revel in revealing nothing about the contents of their products. I don’t care about stealing a product idea; it doesn’t occur to me.

The only thing I need to do is make sure that neither my twins, nor myself, will get sick eating something. Picture losing about twenty pounds in a matter of weeks due to eating something. For a celiac, that’s sometimes rather daunting. But if that’s the worst cross I have, I’ve gotten off easy.

I live in a small town in Ohio, where farming is the big industry. I love it. And the farmer’s market is awesome, not to mention all the rest here. Local food is okay too, so long as I can find out whether or not it’ll make me sick. And I am completely in favor of local food as an option.

If you look at my reply to muawiyah, you’ll see that I recognize a difference here. Generally, the FDA has a safety police mentality these days. That’s reprehensible, to say the least. I am against it.

The only contrary point, for me, is the regs that cover listing contents of food. That gives me the chance to occasionally NOT have to grow all that my family eats, and to NOT only buy lowest-common denominator products, and build food from scratch. As a celiac, I’ve done that quite a bit. Far fewer processed foods than you’d find comfortable. But that’s the breaks. So, to paraphrase: ixnay on the FDA, aside from the food labeling regs that let me easily ensure I don’t get sick. Is that more clear?


11 posted on 01/30/2012 2:48:42 PM PST by sayuncledave (et Verbum caro factum est (And the Word was made flesh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sayuncledave

Clear enough, just be clear myself. You have no obligation to justify your position in my eyes.

I respect the fact that you have needs, and that if you don’t know what is in a product it could possibly contain something that might make you & other members of your family sick.

As your aware there are many ways to obtain that information. And it is indeed nice when everyone is forced to give it, but it is expensive, and morally & legally wrong for Washington to do that.

The Ohio State legislator is perfectly capable of imposing such a mandate for food sold in a supermarket in Ohio. Short of that there as you mentioned there are other-ways to obtain such information.


14 posted on 01/30/2012 4:56:38 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson