Skip to comments.Washington Post’s own ombudsman criticizes paper’s March for Life coverage
Posted on 01/30/2012 11:32:42 PM PST by topherEdited on 01/30/2012 11:42:32 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
January 30, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – After receiving letters from “antiabortion readers” complaining about his paper’s coverage of the March for Life, the Washington Post’s ombudsman has penned a column agreeing with many of their criticisms.
Ombudsman Patrick Pexton says that the Washington Post gave an “incomplete picture” of the March for Life in both its print story and online photo gallery.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Angry readers showered the WaPo about their angry thoughts about the biased coverage...
It’s not just the WaPo...even the local news channels, which usually inflate various liberal marches and demonstrations...barely covered the event. If you were a resident of Arlington or DC....unless you were there, you really didn’t catch the full size and scope.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
What, the media slamming itself? Is it April Fool’s Day yet?
These supposed "ombudsmen" regularly criticize their papers' reporting as biased in one sense or another. Nothing changes.
Whenever 3 leftists gathered to protest Bush, the MSM went live with it.... remember those days?