Posted on 02/01/2012 4:32:56 AM PST by IbJensen
What about Malcolm X as the father? Explains a lot of issues.
“Just a technicality” I’ve seen posted here by Hussein Heads.
Then he lied on his job application. Fraudulent application is due cause for immediate termination with no recourse to appeal.
Actually, Obama said quite a bit. He said “I am a native-born citizen of the US.” His statement affirmed that he was not a “natural born citizen”. A “native-born citizen” is the language of the 14th Amendment, created to make slaves, born on our soil, citizens, but not natural-born citizens. Being citizens, their children become natural born citizens. The 14th Amendment says nothing about natural born citizens, and its principal author, John Bingham told us why in the House Record, “The Globe” of 1866, when he was arguing for passage of the 14th Amendment. He told us, in effect, the same thing the Chief Justice Marshall told us, and the Chief Justice Morrison Waite turned from ‘dictum’ to ‘precedent’ in Minor v. Happersett. That precedent was confirmed as early as 1895 in the case Wong Kim Ark, in which Justice Gray, appointed by the only other ineligible president Chester Arthur, confirmed that Wong Kim, born on our soil to resident Chinese parents, was not a natural born citizen, but was a 14th Amendment citizen, a native-born citizen of the US.
Every US Senator, including Obama, signed Senate Res 511 in April 2008, confirming his and her belief that a natural born citizen is born to two parents who are citizens. They didn't include the other requirement, born on our sovereign soil, because they were creating the false impression the John McCain was eligible. He wasn't, and that is why Republicans refused to vet Obama. Had they done so, McCain would have been gone, and Hillary was ready and able.,
Read Arizona's own Rogers Professor of Law at U of Arizona, Gabriel Chin, whose excellent paper “Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President:” We may all believe his background should have made him eligible, but, in spite of twenty six attempted amendments to Article II Section 1, none has passed - and there were eight attempts alone between 2000 and 2007. Even Clare McCaskill and Obama made pretended to try in February of 2008 with a “Bill to enable Foreign Born Children of Military Citizens to Become President.” It didn't pass, and couldn't have affected a Constitutional definition. Republicans and Democrats colluded to obscure the definition they all understood because it was a political embarrassment, and probably, a violation of the oaths they all took upon being sworn to their offices. McCain seemed deserving, but ignoring the Constitution to reward McCain paved the path for Obama, who never said he was a natural born citizen. He doesn't believe the Constitution is binding, and told us that early in 2002.
You have been told the “Because the term natural born citizen was not defined in the Constitution..” That was sophistry. Terms were not defined in the Constitution, by design. As Minor v Happersett Justice Waite explained, “...In the language understood by the framers of the Constitution, it was never doubted...” There is only one word with a definition contained in the Constitution, and that, 'treason,' is probably because our new form of government, a republic required a variant of the common-law usage - which had many variants as it is.
Don't trust the pundits. Read Minor v. Happersett for yourself. It is not hard to read, but takes some mulling to understand the key idea, that Virginia Minor was only identified in the Constitution as a Citizen of the US, there being no "Uniform Rules for naturalization" before the 14th Amendment, becuase she was born on our soil to parents who were citizen. Without nailing the defintion, Justice Waite had no jurisdiction and no decision.
Dozens of Supreme Court cases containing citations to Minor v. Happersett were scrubbed by Soros’ Center for American Progress cadre and provided by Google to anyone curious enough to search Supreme Court cases involving citizenship. Cornell Law still has an expurgated case, Ex. Parte Lockwood, with a whole paragraph scrubbed. The corrupted "Justia.com" cases have now been replaced, and Google/Justia has blocked access to the "Wayback Machine," the internet archives. Our legislators and judges have caved, as has our presumably conservative legal history pundit, Mark Levin, who is going to the bank while avoiding the most cited legal reference for the first thirty years after 1779, Vattel’s Law of Nations, because Chief Justice John Marshall cites Vattel in “The Venus, 12 US 253, para 289” as the most concise source (and not by any means the only one) for the definition of natural born citizen.
Our legislators have become our enemies by their complicity in obscuring part of our law which was created to protect us. Our framers and founders understood how critical it was that our commander in chief and chief executive be born to and with allegiance to our foundation. Could it be any more clear that Obama has no such allegiance, and that his father, who never had any desire to be a citizen of the US, a professed Marxist, helped define who Obama is?
Why not? It beats watching soap operas all day.
PING.
Excuse me...but I read that the Judge Malihi will issue his default against 0bama today.
And that the SOC is ready to deny 0bama position on the primary ballot.
Anyone have an update from the court today....?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks, I was hoping for an answer like, here is a blog every day on it, or this site covers it every day...:
There seem to be a lot of people here who go out of their way not to take this issue seriously, as apparently evidenced by you, unless I am mistaken about your glib soap opera comment.
This is a live court case and I don’t like reading 6-day old “news” on it.
Look, Treetops, I do indeed take the issue seriously and when interested in the outcome of the future of this liar and communist-muslim, dig out the facts for myself.
Referring to the soap operas was merely a failed attempt at humor.
I’m sure there will be something posted in Breaking News by 5pm today.
There most probably will be something posted on Orly’s site.
Today will be a “sitting on pins” day.
I thought that today is the deadline the judge gave for accepting briefs and he would rule on the 5th, which is a Sunday, which didn’t sound right to me.
Should we call obama Mr. Frank Marshall Davis jr.?
How about “Bammy Davis jr”?...yeah..that’s the ticket.
You may be correct in that he brought forward the final day to submitt pleadings to Feb 1st.
So I guess we will have to wait and see what eventuates.
(waiting with bated breath and eyes nose fingers and toes crossed)
Later
The flames are wonderful! It was a little chilly this morning is Sourhtern Arizona, but it it quite toasty now! ;-)
The constitution needs to be followed. If that means Marco Rubio is not eligible to be VP or Pres., then so be it. Are we going to be a nation of laws or not?
...certainly agree with you, so it was interesting to me that Hannity immediately DISMISSED Joe’s comment with something like “that’s not happening”... right, Hannity , let’s not let a little thing like the Constitution get in the way of the great Hispanic savior who is in the tank for RinoRomney...
ymmv
Please accept my apology for taking offense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.