Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Do We Do Now? Focus on Obama
Rush Limbaugh.com | February 1, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/01/2012 11:14:17 AM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: So what do we do now, folks? That's the question. Everybody wants to know what do we do now? And what we do now is what we should have been doing all along. I'll give you an example. Obama's on TV this morning. He was in Falls Church, Virginia, doing a campaign speech. And in this appearance he announced yet another plan to bail out people who are underwater in their houses. I don't know what this is, HARP 2, HARP 3. We alluded to this a few weeks ago where Obama was gonna take people that were underwater and basically refinance their mortgages and have a monthly payment max out at something like six or seven hundred dollars. Not quite forgive everybody's mortgage, but the effort was to make them think that was going to happen. That's the reason, one of the many reasons, Obama's out there saying, "Vote for me today."

We predicted this a few weeks ago, promising the government will refinance everybody's loans. No credit checks. No proof of anything. All you have to do is promise to vote for him. And that's implied. That is understood. I mean that's the whole point of it. So how do you fight this? What do we do? The only thing that has ever had a chance from the first days of this election, this campaign, has been to make it about Obama. Every day, in every which way possible, on issues, on Obama's record, on the things you can't defend. That's what needs to happen. That's what our chance is. Our team is not all that good. You know it and I know it. They're just not.

We had the CBO projections yesterday. Folks, the latest CBO report projects the US economy to only grow at a rate of 1% in 2013. That is the year, whoever the next president is, is inaugurated. This is the ostensibly nonpartisan CBO. And the projection rate for GDP is 1%, 2.2% for this year. Some of this is due to Obamacare kicking in in 2013. In addition, ladies and gentlemen, the Bush tax cuts are going to expire in 2013. That's not a coincidence that the economy is only gonna grow at 1%. There is going to be, at minimum, a 30% increase in revenue to the government. In other words, 30% more money is gonna come out of the private sector in the form of tax increases or tax cuts ending. Let's put it this way, tax rates being raised, is what's gonna happen, is gonna result in 30% more money headed to Washington.

Also, there's a story here in the stack, it's from Rasmussen. The federal deficit for this year is going to be closer to four trillion rather than the published $1.1 trillion. The focus needs to be on Obama. Whoever you were for, are for, in the Republican primary, at the end of the day Obama remains the target. Obama is the ultimate political target. The White House is the ultimate political objective. They don't have a single thing they can defend. If they want to try buy votes, which they will, go ahead. If they want to go negative on whoever the nominee ends up being, they will, but that record can't be denied. This is not 2008. The magic is gone.

I have a story here in the stack about racial tensions in the schools. So what does that say about all our vaunted diversity training for the last 25 years? All of liberalism is a mess. It's a gigantic failure, and it needs to be pointed out each and every day. This needs to be an ideological campaign aimed at Obama. This from Rasmussen, just put up today at noon. "The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) yesterday reported that the federal budget deficit is projected to reach $1.1 trillion in 2012. That number is troubling enough but the reality is much worse. The United States will actually go about $4 trillion further in debt during the year.

"The difference comes from the fact that government accounting procedures simply ignores the cost of benefits being promised for future Social Security and Medicare recipients. While precise estimates vary as to how much these promises cost, they are in the range of $3 trillion annually. ... The government does not recognize the debt piling up for future Social Security and Medicare benefits because they have officially determined that no such liability exists." The old off-budget trick. It's not there. "As explained in the Federal Budget, 'The Federal Government uses the term "trust fund" very differently from the private sector.'" I'm reading to you from the federal budget. "'The beneficiary of a private trust owns the trust’s income and may own the trust’s assets.'"

For example, you who have trust fund kids and have trust funded your babies $25 million when they hit age 25 or 30, they own it. In the private sector that's what a trust fund is. "However, 'the Federal Government owns and manages the assets and earnings of most federal trust funds.' As if that wasn’t enough, the government 'can unilaterally change the law to raise or lower future trust fund collections and payments or change the purpose for which collections are used.'" And that's why they can go out and play games on the payroll tax reduction, game, trick, whatever.

"Rasmussen notes that 'The simplest way to get people to make bad decisions is to give them bad information. That’s the way con men work, and that’s how America’s Political Class led America into a fiscal crisis. For several decades, the federal government has consistently and systematically misled the American people about federal spending, deficits, and the federal debt.' Rasmussen notes that the actual federal debt is closer to $120 trillion rather than the $16 trillion."

For example, you who have trust fund kids and have trust funded your babies $25 million when they hit age 25 or 30, they own it. In the private sector that's what a trust fund is. "However, 'the Federal Government owns and manages the assets and earnings of most federal trust funds.' As if that wasn’t enough, the government 'can unilaterally change the law to raise or lower future trust fund collections and payments or change the purpose for which collections are used.'" And that's why they can go out and play games on the payroll tax reduction, game, trick, whatever.

"Rasmussen notes that 'The simplest way to get people to make bad decisions is to give them bad information. That’s the way con men work, and that’s how America’s Political Class led America into a fiscal crisis. For several decades, the federal government has consistently and systematically misled the American people about federal spending, deficits, and the federal debt.' Rasmussen notes that the actual federal debt is closer to $120 trillion rather than the $16 trillion."

That's all these promises 50 years out, all the unfunded pensions and liabilities, all of it: $120 trillion. That's everything. The $16 trillion is just the sum total of all the annual deficits since the founding of the country. The $120 trillion is that plus all the promises that have been made to people not born yet. For example, with their Social Security and their Medicare and their Medicaid and what have you. Food stamps, you name it. That's what's owed. Now, there will be revenue against that at some point.

There's not yet because some of that money is just waiting for revenue in the particular year it's due to be paid. It's still gonna be big, still gonna be huge. So the answer here: Focus on Obama. It's always been what this has been about. Every time I've heard Republicans from various corners of the political class and the establishment say, "Well, I don't want to nominate this guy. I don't want to nominate that guy. Because that guy is gonna be the focus! I mean, the focus has to be Obama." Yeah, well, make the focus Obama. Don't tell us! Don't start whining and moaning about which nominee is gonna be. The way I look at it, every damn one of these nominees has been the focus. That's what happens in a primary.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho2012; fl2012; missinglink; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2012 11:14:20 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Meh. STILL never gonna vote Romney. Ever. Gonna sing the Third Party Blues right through Election Day. MAYBE when Romney is blown out we can retake our Party.


2 posted on 02/01/2012 11:16:44 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Looks like Rush is still carrying water for the GOP-E.


3 posted on 02/01/2012 11:18:19 AM PST by alicewonders (Thank you Rick Perry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

Sure looks that way.


4 posted on 02/01/2012 11:19:03 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

you do what you think is best. if you’re gonna nominate romney i will stay home. i will NOT cast my vote for romney nor obama.

that said if you think the tea party is gonna sit still for this, think again,. can anyone say ‘third party’? and if they do, they will certainly outlast the GOP, which is fading fast into irrelevance.


5 posted on 02/01/2012 11:20:41 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.


6 posted on 02/01/2012 11:23:08 AM PST by edwords
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Yeah, I’d rather 4 more years of Obama and his high unemployment, and more Americans on foodstamps, and his getting to pick a nominee for the Supreme Court when Kennedy retires.


7 posted on 02/01/2012 11:23:18 AM PST by Ballygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: camle; All
I saw on a thread last night the monikers GOP-E and GOP-Tea!

I'll take Tea over E, every day!

8 posted on 02/01/2012 11:24:13 AM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: camle
If you don't want to vote in the presidential election, that is your privilege. But you are forgetting about the senate and the House. Do you want the rats to keep the majority in the Senate and get the Majority back in the House?
You know that will happen if everyone thinks like you
9 posted on 02/01/2012 11:27:16 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Hey, Romney is going to unite the party. Heck, he has offered to let the Tea-Party ride in the car carrier all the way to the convention. He even made a special windshield for them.


10 posted on 02/01/2012 11:28:31 AM PST by Anti-Hillary (No Jesus, No Peace! Know Jesus, Know Peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Well, yeah. We focus on candidates. That's inevitable. But are conservatives really losing sight of Obama?

I don't think we can escape him while he's running the national hit parade.

And speaking of PLAYOLA, Romney's little media minions are becoming WAY TOO OBVIOUS to this person who remembers the golden oldies of pre-corporate politics.

We're conservatives. Remember us? We don't vote the way our unions tell us too. We don't follow the marching orders. We are free people.

11 posted on 02/01/2012 11:30:52 AM PST by GVnana (Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Where does Rush tell you to vote for Romney? You can not deny that the focus has to be 0bama, no matter who our nominee will be.
12 posted on 02/01/2012 11:31:21 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Might be somebody’s a little parochial here. Rush is a Florida native and from that perspective it’s all over. Personally I’ll continue to cherish the illusion that a single state’s primaries doesn’t decide the whole thing and that my input might actually be welcomed. Silly me, but there you are.


13 posted on 02/01/2012 11:31:43 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwords; Jim Robinson; DarthVader; 50mm; darkwing104
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.

Time for YOU to get gone. This website is NOT for Romney, nor will it ever be, so GTFO.


14 posted on 02/01/2012 11:34:46 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

The fact that anyone thinks Romney will be an improvement to that is amusing. There will be nothing to stop his Liberal Agenda. They won’t shut him down in the house and Senate. They will fall dutifully in line.

Be careful what you wish for ...


15 posted on 02/01/2012 11:35:30 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Yeah, I’d rather 4 more years of Obama and his high unemployment, and more Americans on foodstamps, and his getting to pick a nominee for the Supreme Court when Kennedy retires.
Yes, only there isn't enough of distinction between Obama and Romney for me to care. BOTH Obama and Romney delivered health care programs based on new rules, new taxes, exchanges, mandates, programs grounded in assumptions about the use of state power to supervise private economic activity in support of progressive goals like universal coverage. The only difference I can think of is that Obama is more honest about his convictions, and consistent in his intentions.
16 posted on 02/01/2012 11:36:27 AM PST by Timaeus (Willard Mitt Romney Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Rush, along with Sarah, are some of the few saying the process needs to continue on beyond FL. He's been saying that for some time, now. I agree with that "illusion".

They cherish the same "illusion" that you do :)

17 posted on 02/01/2012 11:36:27 AM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: edwords
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.
Get behind who?
18 posted on 02/01/2012 11:38:24 AM PST by Timaeus (Willard Mitt Romney Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Yeah, I’d rather 4 more years of Obama and his high unemployment, and more Americans on foodstamps, and his getting to pick a nominee for the Supreme Court when Kennedy retire

Like there will be a difference with Romney.

No, because the "stupid Party" is doing their best to live up to that name by pushing Romney who is no different than voting for a democrat they are going to kill the party because there will be a 3rd party if Romney is the candidate.

You have to be blind, deaf and dumb to not know your base is going to revolt. Strong Christians will not vote for a cultist, strong economic conservatives will go 3rd party, and the strong 2nd amendment crowd will never vote for a gun grabber.

All any 3rd party needs to do is put up a pro-life, economic and 2nd amendment conservative and they grow their party into a power and we watch the dems win.

This is a choice the Republican party heads have made....a choice they understand the consequences of...they have decided to keep dems in power and continue the destruction of America. So one really has to wonder about what the power people are up to in this country and if they really understand who they American people really are outside the major cities.

19 posted on 02/01/2012 11:38:51 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: camle

I’ll vote constitution party if the choice becomes democrat Obama vs democrat Romney


20 posted on 02/01/2012 11:39:56 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edwords
With only four states having had elections so far? You are out of you mind.

NO ROMNEY, NOW OR EVER

21 posted on 02/01/2012 11:39:56 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

And if in the end it shakes out that Romney is the nominee, we’re supposed to stay home and suck up obama for another four? No thanks.


22 posted on 02/01/2012 11:40:08 AM PST by jersey117 (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Thanks for posting, Kaslin.

Rush's advice to "focus on Obama" is one thing, but if America is to be brought back from the brink of disaster, then "We, the People" must have a standard by which to measure him and the opponent we allow to represent us in November. That standard is the Constitution of the United States.

By the Founders' formula, "the People's" written Constitution was the anchor of our liberties, binding government to the "People's" limitations on its power.

Obama's philosophy, in effect, undoes all the monumental work accomplished by the Founders on behalf of liberty and leaves the law afloat and without anchor, relying, as of old, on mere men and women.

From Page xv of "Our Ageless Constitution," allow me to include here excerpted words from President Andrew Jackson's Proclamation of December 10, 1832:

"We have received it [the Constitution] as the work of the assembled wisdom of the nation. We have trusted to it as to the sheet anchor of our safety in the stormy times of conflict with a foreign or domestic foe. We have looked to it with sacred awe as the palladium of our liberties, and with all the solemnities of religion have pledged to each other our lives and fortunes here and our hopes of happiness hereafter in its defense and support. Were we mistaken, my countrymen, in attaching this importance to the Constitution . . .? No. We were not mistaken. The letter of this great instrument is free from this radical fault. . . . No, we did not err! . . . The sages . . . have given us a practical and, as they hoped, a permanent* Constitutional compact. . . . The Constitution is still the object of our reverence, the bond of our Union, our defense in danger, the source of our prosperity in peace: it shall descend, as we have received it, uncorrupted by sophistical construction, to our posterity. . . ."

*Underlining added for emphasis

And, it was Thomas Jefferson who used another metaphor with reference to the Constitution when he indicated that "the People" must "bind them (government) by the chains of the Constitution." In another instance, he declared: "It was intended to lace them up straitly within the enumerated powers. . . ."

The Fall opponent must understand and be able to contrast and explain the foundations of the competing ideas of 2012, pointing out how Obama's ideas depart from those that made America a place of freedom and opportunity. If that opportunity is missed, then liberty, as Americans have known it for over 200 years, may be lost to another and counterfeit set of ideas.

In our focus on "Obama," we must be careful not to choose another carefully-selected candidate who meets the "good ole' boy" Washington Establishment criteria of either Party.

Rather, through the process, we must select a "People's" Constitutional advocate who has immersed himself in a study of the history of civilization and of America's unique ideas. Such a candidate was Reagan. He had studied the Founders ideas of liberty enough to be able to examine issues by the light of the Constitutional principle involved.

Looking at Obama, to be useful and worthwhile, must put him under the light of the Constitution's protections for liberty. So, too, must the candidate who will face him in Fall 2012.

23 posted on 02/01/2012 11:40:31 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Hey, Romney is going to unite the party. Heck, he has offered to let the Tea-Party ride in the car carrier all the way to the convention. He even made a special windshield for them.

LOL! And guess what the Tea Party will be doing up on the roof rack of Mitt-Witt's coronation carriage on the way to the convention?

The same damn thing his Irish Setter did on that infamous 12 hours trip to Canada, when his kids were saying "ewww, Dad? what's that brown stuff coming out the back of the car?" (TRUE STORY)
24 posted on 02/01/2012 11:41:26 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thank the trolls for giving me the biggest laugh in a long, long time. The reality is that there’s not a snowball’s chance that ANY Republicans will miss their chance to vote against Obama.

Given that Hillary vs. Obama actually helped your side, I’m surprised that you waste time here trying to stir up trouble.


25 posted on 02/01/2012 11:42:55 AM PST by Siegfried X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwords
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.

Getting behind Romney IS self-destruction.

Some of us have been observing and vetting Romney for more than five years, and understand that in a head-to-head of Obama vs. Romney, there is no "lesser" evil. They are equally depraved. A vote for either one would be a vote to encourage, enlarge, endorse, depravity in our America.

My vote would go elsewhere -- third party, write-in, who knows. I would CERTAINLY cast a vote somewhere in the Presidential so that it is on record that neither Obama nor Romney got that vote. One of the two might win, but I'd do what I could to make sure their vote tally could NEVER be construed as a mandate.

But let's hope that it ends up being Newt vs. Obama.

GODSPEED NEWT GINGRICH.

26 posted on 02/01/2012 11:43:11 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Oh I agree, no doubt Romney will appoint a radical progressive to the Court, and Romney will make policy and enforce regulations that will make unemployment go even higher than it has with Obama, and in effect Romney will cause even more Americans to collect food stamps and become dependent on social service programs, and no doubt Romney will raise taxes and make unfriendly business environments that will cause Americans to become dependent on social programs.


27 posted on 02/01/2012 11:43:42 AM PST by Ballygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Er ... Rush currently lives in Florida. He is a native of Missouri. He is no more a native Floridian than Nancy Pelosi is a native Californian. Just FYI!


28 posted on 02/01/2012 11:47:02 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
And if in the end it shakes out that Romney is the nominee, we’re supposed to stay home and suck up obama for another four? No thanks.

No, we vote for every conservative candidate below the presidential ticket level, because as I've said many times, if 0bama is re-elected it means America gets that bottle of socialism poured down our gullet against our will, but if Romney wins, we still get the same rot gut, but served up a glass at a time in nice exquisite crystal goblets.

Romney is nothing more than '0bama-lite', but both blends are toxic as Hell and I ain't drinkin' with that crowd.
29 posted on 02/01/2012 11:48:33 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I hate hate hate hate Myth - but at the end of the day - for me its about sending that Kenyan communist pofs home over all else.


30 posted on 02/01/2012 11:50:11 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

I totally agree man.
I’ll go Mormon over Muzzie for sure.


31 posted on 02/01/2012 11:50:57 AM PST by nascarnation (DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Yeah, so is he going to hose us off too?


32 posted on 02/01/2012 11:50:59 AM PST by Anti-Hillary (No Jesus, No Peace! Know Jesus, Know Peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Yeah, so is he going to hose us off too?

He's been hosing conservatives all his g*ddamned life. Mitt-Witt is a true chip off the ol' block, his old man the egotistical horse's ass George Romney never made it to the White House, and if there is a God in Heaven, Mitt-Witt won't either.
33 posted on 02/01/2012 11:52:30 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Rasmussen notes that 'The simplest way to get people to make bad decisions is to give them bad information.'"

Or, when it comes to the voting public, don't give them policy information, instead give them platitudes or allegations, depending on whether you are going "positive" or "negative." And, to cement the majority's direction, provide them will polling data - also known as "bad information."

34 posted on 02/01/2012 11:54:22 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I will vote in the general as I always do — “R” from the top down. I will not allow the commie to win by default and will do my part to ensure he doesn’t get another 4 years to finish us off. Personally, I can’t take the daily stress and depression involved in having him and his czars controlling my country any longer.


35 posted on 02/01/2012 11:54:28 AM PST by jersey117 (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The focus needs to be on Obama.
No, the focus right now needs to be on the individual candidates!

If they want to go negative on whoever the nominee ends up being, they will, but that record can't be denied.
So why are you pushing to keep the focus on Obama? There is time for that when the nominee is decided upon, as you've indicated.

Walking and chewing gum at the same time shouldn't be that hard.

36 posted on 02/01/2012 11:55:49 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

And while I assume you are being sarcastic, I am not. Yes he will.


37 posted on 02/01/2012 11:57:22 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

And while I don’t agree, I respect that.


38 posted on 02/01/2012 11:58:43 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

I know Romney will send me into fits, make me mad beyond words, and make me fight him on most things, but we need to rid ourself of obama.

We were able to stop W w dubai ports, meirs, amnesty, etc., we can do the same with Myth, hopefully.

The importance of defeating obama is not about romney! Its about sending a message that we are not a communist nation in decline!


39 posted on 02/01/2012 11:59:12 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: edwords

dude, Romo is the GOP self destructing..


40 posted on 02/01/2012 12:00:35 PM PST by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I listened today... Rush... you had better tread lightly. We that will not be fooled again are YOUR base too... without us... you retire a rich man... but the gold mic will go silent.

LLS

41 posted on 02/01/2012 12:02:04 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwords

I rather get behind a T-Rex with diarrhea, thank you.


42 posted on 02/01/2012 12:06:13 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Yeah, I’d rather 4 years of Romney and his high unemployment, and more Americans on foodstamps, and his pushing Romneycare on the states, his assault on the 2nd amendment, and his getting to pick a liberal nominee for the Supreme Court when Kennedy retires.

There, fixed it for ya.

43 posted on 02/01/2012 12:09:15 PM PST by suijuris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Yeah, I’d rather 4 more years of Obama and his high unemployment, and more Americans on foodstamps, and his getting to pick a nominee for the Supreme Court when Kennedy retires.

Don't forget dead border agents killed with Eric Holder's guns.

44 posted on 02/01/2012 12:15:37 PM PST by Once-Ler (ProLife ProGun ProGod ProSoldier ProBusiness Republican for Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'll vote for all conservatives down ticket... but I will not vote for romney for any reason. You can vote for him... the repubics do not need us... conservatism and the TEA Party are no longer a power to be reckoned with so... you guys no longer need to worry about us. We are so insignificant as the Conservative base, that our votes are no longer needed.

If romney loses... it can't be blamed on those of us that refuse to vote for a lying, baby killing marxist. SCOTUS choices... hah hah hah... like obama needs the SCOTUS to rule. He has violated the US Constitution many times since stealing office. When obama wins reelection... and if romney wins the nomination... obama will win reelection... he will march us right into stalinville. Look to the party leadership for blame when that happens... and we right-wing "wingnuts" as anne "the whoredog" coulter calls us... are not going to take the crap from republican party hacks trying to embarrass us and shame us into voting for another one world order, white-bread version of obama.

LLS

45 posted on 02/01/2012 12:16:28 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edwords
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.

It is the definition of insanity to do the same thing over and over again and expect different results. Just how is Romney different from Obama besides skin color? I never voted skin color before and will not start now. Just would not be right in a civil war to have voted to put the enemy in power then have to shoot him out of it. That would be insurrection and would be wrong. And Civil War is where we are headed as I see it. Too old to fight, and don't want to see my country covered in blood, so I will not vote for Romney.

Progressives are the enemy, Who gives a toot if they have an R or D behind their name!?

46 posted on 02/01/2012 12:17:15 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Rush is a Florida native. Just because he lives in FL does not not make him a native. Rush was born and raised in Cape Girardeau, Missouri

I live in TN, but I wasn't born or raised there. Does that make me a native of TN? No

Of course one state primary or 2 do not decide the entire election

47 posted on 02/01/2012 12:20:31 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Rush is a Florida native. Just because he lives in FL does not not make him a native. Rush was born and raised in Cape Girardeau, Missouri

I live in TN, but I wasn't born or raised there. Does that make me a native of TN? No

Of course one state primary or 2 do not decide the entire election

48 posted on 02/01/2012 12:20:48 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
If romney wins... you will have that Glock pried from your hands... ask mitt... just ask him.

LLS

49 posted on 02/01/2012 12:22:31 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; Jim Robinson
You ain't alone brother. The republican operatives on this thread need a big old can of Jimbo Robinson Whupass opened on them. I cannot believe that Jim will allow romney to be promoted on this site. No way... no way.

LLS

50 posted on 02/01/2012 12:28:50 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson