Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven
[snip]...Jablonski remained true to his word -- neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing. I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind. According to reports in the blogosphere, the president's schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.
Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the "crazy birthers" would really do something...well, crazy. Or unlawful. In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.
The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing -- one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news -- that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.
Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Wasn’t he adopted by soeroto (sp?)
...which promptly went into the round circular file.
Were both of his parents US citizens? That is the question. The answer seems to be NO. The same reason Marco Rubio won’t accept VP position.
I’m aware. I still want to know if he adopted by soeroto (sp?)
His name would be pre-sent soeroto.(sp?)
Just a thought...
“Facts and truth really don’t have much to do with each other.”
Jail,Jail Jail
Obama need to be put in Jail!
People just don’t get it.
Nice try and I agree but King Obama is our dictator and he makes his own law.
Natural Born Citizen means CITIZEN AT THE MOMENT OF BIRTH and nothing else.
You have NO case law that says otherwise. The Case Law you claim to have does not count, since Congress had no Citizenship language in place at that time.
You are wrong.
Your sources are wrong.
(However, Obama was arrogant to ignore the Court, and Obama deserves a default judgment against him)
"Everyone knows the judge is obviously a racist if he doesn't throw this out of court."There you go again!
Wasn’t it Lenin who said “If you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.”?
So an anchor baby can run for president?
I just want to see what the Secret Service will do when the officers of the Georgia State Patrol attempt to make said arrest. They can't love that arrogant prick so much that they'd want to stop a duly sworn LEO from doing his lawful duty.
T'would be very interesting.
“....and he makes his own law.”
.
Only because of a spineless congress.
The most incredible thing to me is the complete lack of coverage. There is a chance that this challenge could result in Obama’s name not being on the Georgia ballot. One would think that would rate at least a human interest story somewhere in the back of at least a few papers, or a negative editorial. But everyone in the mainstream media is afraid to touch this story. Do the insiders think that this could result in a serious and possibly violent backlash or are they worried that our enemies will view this as a seriously weakened president and an opportunity to start trouble abroad?
Good for Sen. Rubio.
Incidentally, since my mother was born in Canada, I am not a natural born citizen either.
snip-”New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite “Minor v. Happersett” as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.
Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state “Full Text of Case”, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court.”
Well...according to post number 12 you’re good to go. lol
Just a question in principle: Is there need for case law in a first instance? Further, doesn't the applicable definition derive from the time the law at issue was adopted? Else we are in the land of "living Constitution."
Yes, I think he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro.
Minor v. Happersett
The US Constitution explicitly excuses Congressmen from such a thing, at least while they are on official business. But I haven’t heard of any parallel provision for a president, or a court case where the USSC heard the question concerning a question. This little Georgia court seems to be the mouse that roared.
question concerning a question
I mean the question concerning a president
Obama always has thought he was better than the rest of us & had his nose in the air to show his contempt for the U.S. & its citizens. He shows it with his over 90 rounds of golf, parties & overseas trips that are costing our people $$$$$ along with all the $$$$$ he gave to the Unions & his “special” friends. I’ve had enough & will relish the day he gets his “just rewards”.
If she became a naturalized citizen by the time of your birth, that would fix that. In little barry dunham’s case, his claimed father was never a citizen of the U.S. and at the time of barry’s birth, his mother Stanley Ann Dunham was not old enough to pass even citizenship on to him, so if he was not born in HI (ahem, he wasn’t), he wasn’t even a citizen until someone at some past time (perhaps no more than five years ago) in Hawaii forged a birth documentation for the bastard.
I thought it was Goebbels.
This pro Obama nonsense is revolting. And the fact that they use irrelevant cases such as Wong Ark Kim (a 14th amendment case not a Article II; Sec. I case prove the speciousnes of the claims ofthe Messiah's apologists.
“Incidentally, since my mother was born in Canada, I am not a natural born citizen either.”
Nonsense. Your parents’ birth doesn’t matter. It’s YOU who matters.
My father was likewise born in Canada (of US parents, incidentally). But while we always have to go through conniptions any time employment/clearance is applied for, it’s because of him, not me.
The above pdf is the proposed order drafted by one of the attorneys in the Georgia challenge to Obama’s placement on the GA ballot and contains a cogent argument based on the law.
I’d say many agree with this position.
He is and has committed HIGH TREASON, so the penalty for that is in order upon summary of trial. What does the U.S. now use as their means to punish HIGH TREASON? ... And he has guilty accomplices, too, who have committed treason.
This is how the system works.
Learn the system before you argue, OK?
So you are another 0bamunist - one of Hussein’s butt boys who is anxious to protect him against those who think The Constituion should be upheld and 0bama shouldn’t get an affirmative action pass just because he is black.
Before anyone embarrasses himself by asserting that Bill Clinton was compelled to testify and then perjured himself, that was to a federal judge.
Strange. Last I checked, state courts couldn’t issue subpoenas to persons who aren’t in that state. They don’t have jurisdiction. All they can do is request that the witness’s state’s courts issue one. And even then, it is generally only available for depositions, not to compel appearance in court.
But not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!!!!
And what sort of reception did that get?
If she was a naturalized citizen before you were born, you would be natural born. For example, Dukakis was eligible because of this.
It only takes a thread to unravel an entire garment.
Totalitarians buy, imprison or kill to affect their control.
It just takes some people in the right places who don’t care about these things to resist, and bring the house of cards down.
Psalm 127:1 “1 Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it:”
Actually, Barry could not appear because he was likely to lose the case on the grounds that he had used forged documents to optain ballot entry, so he had no alternative but to ignore the court summons. He is a criminal oh so close to being apprehended, and there is so much power at stake, the GA court will be dealt with illicitly and the issue will be buried by the media which is the enemy of We The People.
More than half, of all the above, do NOT want Obama to be reelected.
I’ve been around some dirty people in government, and this is exactly how they play it.
They get to take a graceful exit usually because they hold dirt on others themselves.
It’s a house of cards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.