Skip to comments.Obama Got Served
Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven
click here to read article
Strange. Last I checked, state courts couldn’t issue subpoenas to persons who aren’t in that state. They don’t have jurisdiction. All they can do is request that the witness’s state’s courts issue one. And even then, it is generally only available for depositions, not to compel appearance in court.
But not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!!!!
And what sort of reception did that get?
If she was a naturalized citizen before you were born, you would be natural born. For example, Dukakis was eligible because of this.
It only takes a thread to unravel an entire garment.
Totalitarians buy, imprison or kill to affect their control.
It just takes some people in the right places who don’t care about these things to resist, and bring the house of cards down.
Psalm 127:1 “1 Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it:”
Actually, Barry could not appear because he was likely to lose the case on the grounds that he had used forged documents to optain ballot entry, so he had no alternative but to ignore the court summons. He is a criminal oh so close to being apprehended, and there is so much power at stake, the GA court will be dealt with illicitly and the issue will be buried by the media which is the enemy of We The People.
More than half, of all the above, do NOT want Obama to be reelected.
What’s going on in Florida?
I’ve been around some dirty people in government, and this is exactly how they play it.
They get to take a graceful exit usually because they hold dirt on others themselves.
It’s a house of cards.
“Natural Born Citizen” has ALWAYS meant “Citizen at the Moment of Birth” -—
However, Congress has changed the rules, more than once, as to which New Borns qualify, and which do not.
(Slighly paraphrased, I think.)
Your “Case Law” does not control in this matter, not at all.
It is entirely possible to despise Obama and STILL disagree with you.
Congress, by simple legislation, can deny Citizenship to “Anchor Babies”
This case is not about President Obama. It’s about Candidate Obama. If he wants to be on the GA ballot he needed to show up. Judge Malihi said that it could be that Obama would not be required to show up but the pleading of “I’m too busy” doesn’t cut it in a court of law - so if Obama wanted to have a LEGAL reason to not have to honor the subpoena he needed to present the legal argument. He presented nothing so Malihi said he had to be there. He wasn’t. He had his chance. If there was an argument that would have excused his presence he should have used it. He didn’t even have enough respect for the rule of law to do that.
I hope he is found in contempt of court, because he has shown contempt for the rule of law in EVERYTHING he has done, and this very public, blatant display is for no reason. Why should he watch a live feed of the hearing if he was “too busy” to actually be there? That was a load of bullcrap, and I think we all know why he wasn’t there.
I think you’re wrong-—the cocktail party republicans are more concerned with getting the senate and keeping their cushy jobs. That’s why they want the “mayonnaise sandwich on white bread” Mittens.
Many are complicit in the non-vetting of Bath-House Barry prior to the elections.
Why no reaction to the TWO Certificates of Nomination Pelosi and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond put out? They KNEW he was ineligible and tried to cover for him.
I'll never survive Laurence Tribe not liking me, sigh....
Btw... appeal to authority is a logical fallacy. It is the definition of the concept that matters.
I wonder if applying to be put on GA’s ballot means that the person is subject to GA’s authority.
The guy has so many names who knows which one is the legal one?