Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

Indeed.


2 posted on 02/06/2012 7:07:26 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: traderrob6

OK – I have some serious issues with this. All a female has to do is call 911 (or the MPs if on a military base) and say that she was “afraid” her husband or male significant other was GOING to hit/strike/abuse her. No physical evidence of any abuse is required. BAM! Politically correct judges will INSTANTLY dispatch the (“Oh, boy, OVERTIME!”) unionized cops to the residence, body slam, cuff and shackle and probably mace the male in question, and “confiscate” all his weaponry. In the case of the military man, no matter there’s no evidence, no matter what the female’s record is, his career is OVER. In no other situation do the jackbooted wannabes act with like zeal, in no other like situation do PC judges and DAs order weapons seizure. Hey – if a MALE calls and says that HEs being physically threatened by his FEMALE significant other (especially on a military installation) he gets “Yeah, right”. And if Barney Fife DOES respond, do HER weapons get seized? Hell, no. Bottom line – any male who would abuse a woman is not a man and deserves to get what he has coming. However, PC cops and judges need to wake up and read the Constitution. In this case, the man’s PARENT’s guns were seized because in “officer in-my-opinion’s” view, Dad’s gun was “under the control” of the male in question. Reprehensible. Barney needs to be prosecuted and FIRED.


19 posted on 02/07/2012 3:30:25 AM PST by Nathaniel (- A Man Without A Cross -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson