Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia's "Silly" 1-Gun-Per-Month Law Close to Repeal
Opposingviews ^ | 6 February, 2012 | NSSF

Posted on 02/07/2012 5:52:15 AM PST by marktwain

Legislation (HB940, SB323) that would overturn Virginia’s One Gun A Month law has already passed the Virginia House of Delegates and is slated to be voted on in the State Senate as early as today. Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) has said he will sign it into law should it pass.

Despite the fact that Virginia is largely considered to be a pro-gun state, legislators have for years rationed the Second Amendment rights of its citizens with a law that limits handgun purchases to one a month — in effect, treating a constitutionally protected right as nothing more than a privilege.

Limiting the sale of firearms to law-abiding Virginians is premised on the false belief that doing so reduces illegal firearms trafficking. No evidence supports such a claim. In fact, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the significant drop in crime that began in the mid-1990s coincided with more guns being in private possession and more restrictive gun laws being taken off the books. We’re continuing to see this today. As crime continues to drop, we’ve just marked the twentieth straight month that National Instant Criminal Background Check figures, used to gauge firearm sales, increased when compared to the same period the previous year.

As for “one gun a month,” even Bob Ricker, a lobbyist for the anti-gun group Virginians Against Handgun Violence, testified under oath in 2003, “I think one gun a month is silly.”

In its Heller and McDonald decisions, the Supreme Court made clear that the Second Amendment is an individual right. The Virginia Senate should follow the House of Delegates and recognize this by repealing one gun a month – a law that only hurts law-abiding citizens.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: banglist; gun; mcdonnell; month; va; va2012; vageneralassembly
One gun a month is a clear infringement on the right to keep and bear arms.
1 posted on 02/07/2012 5:52:21 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Let's be clear about this ~ it wasn't "legislators" in the generic sense that kept the 1 per month limit in place, it was DEMOCRAT legislators. For much of the period the Republicans did not control the Senate, and even when they did RINOs (former Democrats in this formerly 1 party state), did the bidding of their true masters at the Washington Post and kept beneficial legislation tied up in committee.

More recently we've had problems of a similar nature with expansion of the franchise. McDonnell, Bolling and others who ran as Conservative Republicans have revealed to us all they are NO DIFFERENT than the RINOs before them and don't want to let Virginians vote in primaries for all the candidates registered to run for President with the RNC.

It's just like whackamole ~ we beat down one bunch of RINOs and we get another bunch of them. Eventually I hope to see the concept of participatory democracy sweep into this state ~

2 posted on 02/07/2012 5:59:14 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

You have to be a resident for 30 days before you can buy a firearm in VA.

It is possible for a new resident to get a concealed carry license in less than 30 days.

So, you can carry concealed before you can buy a firearm.

But only one handgun a month.


3 posted on 02/07/2012 6:07:50 AM PST by CPOSharky (The only thing straight, white, Christian males get is the blame for everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Senate voted to repeal 21-19. Two Dems joined Repubs. McDonnell has “indicated he will sign it into law”.


4 posted on 02/07/2012 6:22:59 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Virginia’s first black governor, the illustrious Doug Wilder brought that fascist legislation down upon us. He did it for “public safety”. Fascist democrats are always so concerned about “public safety”.. don’t you know.

Freedom doesn’t guarantee safety. Freedom only guarantees freedom.

I choose freedom. I’ll secure my own safety. Thanks but no thanks to the “public safety” demagogues.


5 posted on 02/07/2012 6:33:46 AM PST by CaptainKrunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

In NJ, we have the same law limiting handgun purchases to one every 30 days. I wonder if this will prompt the NJ state legislature to repeal it here... NOT!!!


6 posted on 02/07/2012 6:46:16 AM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The fascist dems are wringing their hands about the "return of gun running" from Richmond.  I wonder if Eric Holders Department of Injustice will impliment a gun running program in VA to try to get the law repealed once McDonnell signs it.  Why not?  The DOIJ could hire someone to buy hundreds of guns and distribute them to felon crack dealers all over VA and surrounding states.  That should teach those 2nd ammendment nuts a thing or two.  Right Eric?

 

Richmond Times Dispatch

"But Del. Patrick A. Hope, Demorat-Arlington, said he feared a return to the gun trafficking of the 1990s.

"We were the gun-running capital of the nation," he said. "Let's be serious — is one gun a month really an undue burden?"

Lingamfelter said the law now merely inconveniences law-abiding gun collectors, noting that federal law already prohibits the transfer of guns across state lines and adding that nothing prevents criminals from acquiring guns in "back alleys and through theft.""

Excerpt - Richmond Times Dispatch

 

7 posted on 02/07/2012 6:59:11 AM PST by CaptainKrunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky

If First Amendment rights were rationed like Second Amendment rights, then we would have the right to have one opinion per month - my opinion for February is that this is s stupid law.

Waiting for March for another opinion...


8 posted on 02/07/2012 7:49:48 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Which are you? A producer, a looter, or a moocher of wealth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Liberal: Why do you need more than 1 gun a month?
Me: Why do you need pornography?


9 posted on 02/07/2012 7:52:21 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson