Skip to comments.
Flowers, dinner, bowling --and counseling-- ordered by Broward judge in domestic case
South Florida Sun-Sentinel ^
| February 7, 2012
| Danielle A. Alvarez
Posted on 02/07/2012 12:29:27 PM PST by ConservativeStatement
FORT LAUDERDALE A marital spat that began when a Plantation man didn't wish his wife a happy birthday and then escalated into a domestic violence charge resulted in an usual bond court ruling by a perceptive judge.
Instead of setting bond or keeping Joseph Bray locked up, he ordered him to treat his spouse to dinner, a bowling date and then to undergo marriage counseling.
"He's going to stop by somewhere and he's going to get some flowers," Judge John "Jay" Hurley said during the first appearance hearing. "And then he's going to go home, pick up his wife, get dressed, take her to Red Lobster. And then after they have Red Lobster, they're going to go bowling."
(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: birthday; domesticdispute; judge
I sense the writer meant "unusual" in the opening paragraph. Anyway, Red Lobster and bowling...or bust.
To: ConservativeStatement
Women like surprises for their birthday unless it’s the pimp hand.
2
posted on
02/07/2012 12:39:36 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
To: ConservativeStatement
If my husband took me either to Red Lobster or a bowling alley, I’d be furious. I hope the judge asked the lady her tastes in entertainment before his ruling.
3
posted on
02/07/2012 12:43:51 PM PST
by
Albion Wilde
(A land of hyper-legalisms is not the same as a land of law. --Mark Steyn)
To: ConservativeStatement
man didn't wish his wife a happy birthday ...How to start WWIII
4
posted on
02/07/2012 1:15:29 PM PST
by
dragonblustar
(Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
To: ConservativeStatement
>> treat his spouse to dinner, a bowling date
.. and then back to the doublewide trailer for a Pabst Blue Ribbon nitecap?
5
posted on
02/07/2012 1:16:25 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
To: dragonblustar
man didn't wish his wife a happy birthday ... How to start WWIII If he forgets their Anniversary, it's Armageddon.
6
posted on
02/07/2012 1:17:53 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: Albion Wilde
>> I hope the judge asked the lady her tastes in entertainment before his ruling.
nah, he just noted that her right arm was larger and more muscular than her left. :-)
7
posted on
02/07/2012 1:18:16 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
To: Nervous Tick
.. and then back to the doublewide trailer for a Pabst Blue Ribbon nitecap?Frank Booth would approve.
8
posted on
02/07/2012 1:19:27 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
Boop His Cute Little Tootsies!
Pretty Baby Looks Innocent Now
But He'll Be Huge and Fiery Soon
Donate!
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up
9
posted on
02/07/2012 1:23:49 PM PST
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: dfwgator
ROFL! Not being all that plugged into the movie culture, I had to look that one up.
Perhaps most memorable of all is when Jeffrey Beaumont requests Heineken Beer and Frank Booth replies, "Heineken? Expletive that expletive! Pabst Blue Ribbon!"
10
posted on
02/07/2012 1:30:19 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
To: ConservativeStatement
"...a domestic violence charge resulted in an usual bond court ruling by a
perceptive stupid judge."
Fixed it. These glowing reports of judges ordering impossible-to-enforce rulings make me sick.
11
posted on
02/07/2012 1:30:34 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
To: Cyber Liberty
Exactly.
Apparently, this judge thinks that if he just orders these two losers to act decently they will mend their ways. What an idiot.
12
posted on
02/07/2012 2:26:10 PM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Pray for our republic.)
To: Cyber Liberty
This reminds me of a 1972 case in which a protester was convicted of disorderly conduct during which he called a cop the “P” word. The judge said he would suspend half of his fine if he would spend an hour sitting on a barnyard fence contemplating the difference between a policeman and a pig.
To: Fiji Hill
I could agree with that because it's enforceable. Judges issuing orders that cannot be enforced without undue expense are what chaps my hide. They are issued by the thousands daily by "Family Court" judges. A judge orders one parent to do something, and if the parent refuses to do it the other parent has to petition the court for an order of contempt, and that runs up the bill for the injured party.
14
posted on
02/07/2012 2:42:22 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson