Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Video at link.

Being ugly is one thing. Being a leftist destructor of America is quite another. There's something telling in Obozo's 'character' wherein he continually choses very ugly Marxist females who share his hatred for our Constitution and his desire to destroy America. Further he lards up his 850 White Hut staff with beings who are sexually confused. There are many homosexuals, trans-gendered freaks and, of course, lesbians. Obozo has a distinct affinity for the sodomists as he was trained at the feet of one old predator who plied his pupils with jars of whisky, cigarettes and drugs. Obozo's mind is out to lunch thereby the necessity for teleprompters.

This Ginsburg crow is one ugly female. Ugly in her countenance and ugly inside.

The Senate needs radical change in order that the citizenry get hope. Require majority rule, put 90 days limit on advise and consent. The goal of keeping big states from rolling small ones is dealt with by the 2 per state allocation, it doesn’t need amplified for the vanity of each senator.

Return the selection of senators to the state legislatures wherein it was until 1913. Reduce those length of terms to four years.

1 posted on 02/08/2012 8:26:56 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: IbJensen
Halfassed in America.
2 posted on 02/08/2012 8:33:19 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (So just where does the "buck stop" at the Department of "Justice"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

With that criteria in mind, every Republican except for three; Don Nickles, Bob Smith, and Jesse Helms”

Man, I do miss Jesse Helms. He is irreplaceable.


3 posted on 02/08/2012 8:34:06 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

All but 3 republicans voted in favor of her nomination, so the republicans are just as at fault. It’s pathetic when it comes down to important decisions you can’t rely on either party. Wait, no, you can rely on them both to screw America over!


4 posted on 02/08/2012 8:35:10 AM PST by bigdirty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Any woman whose armpit hair can be styled with a curling iron should be rejected out of hand. Like ginsberg should have been in the first place.


5 posted on 02/08/2012 8:35:16 AM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Any one lawyer is smarter than the rest of the world combined. You don’t even have to ask them, they automatically tell you that. One of their courses in their first year of law school is “ARROGANCE - YES WE ARE BETTER”.


6 posted on 02/08/2012 8:36:20 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

This method of creating a dictatorship has been under way for some time. The radical left has been moving to get as many important decisions AWAY FROM THE VOTERS and into the “appointing hands” of the dictators and associated radicals who want to rule of America, not see it governed by and for the people.


7 posted on 02/08/2012 8:36:24 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

“The Senate needs radical change in order that the citizenry get hope.”

Unfortunately, the radical citizenry ( about 40% or more) think that Ms. Ginzburg IS hope.

IMHO


8 posted on 02/08/2012 8:37:38 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
We need a long-term campaign for judge removal. The criterion that would make a SC or Appellate judge unfit for office, besides the ordinary criminal tests, is the content of his decisions: 1) issuing decisions not authorized under the Constitution; or 2) contravening what is written there.

This should be part and parcel of a well-publicized, consistent, across-the-board return to what is written in the USC or its amendments. This is Congress's job, it's consistent with the law, and it's essential for our survival.

9 posted on 02/08/2012 8:39:33 AM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

I thought this boring old anti-American black-robed leftist moron was going to retire because of health reasons.


10 posted on 02/08/2012 8:40:56 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

If Ms Ginsburg made these comments during her confirmation hearings she would have been escorted out of the room in handcuffs.


11 posted on 02/08/2012 8:41:09 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Thank you, Ruthie, with your comments in Egypt, for reminding the entire country just how important the vote in 2012 is...
Nobama = no commie justices


12 posted on 02/08/2012 8:43:53 AM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
Google "supreme court oath of office"

You will find that Ruth B-G swore (or affirmed) something like this:

"I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

I suggest she be impeached for false affirmation, perjury, violation of duty, ... whatever.

Ruth B-G does not deserve the high office she holds.

17 posted on 02/08/2012 8:53:30 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (Excommunicate evildoers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

"Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."

~Ruth Bader Ginsburg




Please support Free Republic
click the pic


19 posted on 02/08/2012 8:55:20 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
Ruth Bader Ginsburg should have been rejected
out of hand as she was the Chief Counsel for the ACLU.

The ACLU was founded by three utopian Marxists
to destroy America by twisting the Constitution.


20 posted on 02/08/2012 8:57:30 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

“Radical statists” - I prefer the term, “state supremacists.”


21 posted on 02/08/2012 9:00:45 AM PST by Noumenon ("I tell you, gentlemen, we have a problem on our hands." Col. Nicholson-The Bridge on the River Qwai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
Establishment Republican politicians, in their naive, idealistic beliefs, assume all judicial appointees will respect the law as written and won't impose their own partisan notions on legal decisions. They don't want to dirty their hands with partisan bickering.

Liberals/Progressives/Marxists snicker cynically at that stupidity. Their job is to advance socialism/communism "by any means necessary." Controlling the courts with partisan puppets is the most direct way to achieve revolution without having to consider "the consent of the people."

23 posted on 02/08/2012 9:13:49 AM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg

Was there ever a more fitting name for satire in the court. I mean she even LOOKS like her!


24 posted on 02/08/2012 9:32:29 AM PST by Mr. K (Were the Soviet-Era propogandists as gleefully willing as our Lame-stream Media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
This Ginsburg crow is one ugly female.

Caught a shot of her and Kagen after the SOTU speech. Drooling old crone and mouth-breathing imbecile.

25 posted on 02/08/2012 9:44:39 AM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

I wish that Ginsburg had made this statement back in 1993, when Bill Clinton appointed her. Maybe she would have been rejected. Now our only hope is that she retires soon. Given her age and health, that is possible.

We need to win this year’s election very badly. The stakes have never been higher.


30 posted on 02/08/2012 11:21:08 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson