How can “civil unions” be civil when it is defined by sodomy. There is no “right” to sodomy-—something which is not conducive to the “general welfare” of a civil society by any amount of twisting the meaning of the Constitution. The Constitution and Just Law is designed to promote “Virtue”, the necessary element in a free nation and the fundamental reason for social contracts, understood by all Founders of the Constitution.
To deliberately promote ideas which destroy civil societies, should be as illegal as promotion of killing babies-—both vile, inhumane and need to be abolished.
Willard the liberal is FOR HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS.
He sees nothing wrong with perferted, degenerate sex, that kills if practiced. He is also for sodomites being allowed to adopt children and raise them. In otherwords he does not think a child needs two parents of the opposite sex.
Willard the liberal is one more sick, demented person. Now tell me how his views on this differ from the most liberal democrat in the world. They don’t, not in the least. That’s why he’s the worst possible GOP candidate to run against Obama, because their social beliefs are identical.
legally speaking ALL marriage is defined as a civil union.
thhis is deliberate via the ABA model laws program.
There should be a prohibition against judges belonging to the ABA since it is a left wing lobby group that does not represent the vaaaaaaaast majority of lawyers.