Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2012 9:42:56 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 02/08/2012 9:46:25 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Big time has already cut 70% of our nuke force with his SALT treaty. Things are going to get exciting as the PAX Americana ends.


3 posted on 02/08/2012 9:48:33 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

That’s just silly.

Who would make a treaty that would go against the best interests of the United States????

oh wait...


4 posted on 02/08/2012 9:49:09 AM PST by Mr. K (Were the Soviet-Era propogandists as gleefully willing as our Lame-stream Media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Doesn’t treaty ratification require 66 votes in the Senate?


5 posted on 02/08/2012 9:57:18 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Particularly scary is that the treaties, once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.

I do believe a different opinion exists HERE

6 posted on 02/08/2012 9:59:53 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the Constitution, always. Allegiance to a party, never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Particularly scary is that the treaties, once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.

While these treaties are atrocious, and any one of them would be problematic if ratified, the United States Supreme Court absolutely CAN overturn all or part of any treaty which it decides violates the United States Constitution.

Article III, Section 2: "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority..."

9 posted on 02/08/2012 10:17:30 AM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% MORE sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Somewhere around here, I saw an old piece of parchment paper, that said something about the Senate having to ratify a treaty before it’s enforcement.

Now where did I see that? Oh, I remember, it was in Zer0’s bathroomm!


10 posted on 02/08/2012 10:27:59 AM PST by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Bump for reading and understanding later.


13 posted on 02/08/2012 11:50:04 AM PST by CitizenM (Obama's legacy will be to be remembered as The architect of the decline of the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Communist dictators don’t need to worry about little things like the Constitution. Just ask Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the wicked witch of the Left.


21 posted on 02/08/2012 8:28:21 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson