Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Obama savors Santorum's sweep
The Orange County Register ^ | 2-8-2012 | Orange County Register editorial boarad

Posted on 02/08/2012 2:12:35 PM PST by landsbaum

Rick Santorum may have swept all three states Tuesday in the latest Republican presidential contests, but the big winner might have been Democratic President Barack Obama...

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; nomination; obama; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

1 posted on 02/08/2012 2:12:41 PM PST by landsbaum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

What is up with you and the inability to add more of an excerpt?


2 posted on 02/08/2012 2:17:11 PM PST by And2TheRepublic (People like freedom of speech, but only when it's sweet to their ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

That’s my feeling and I believe the Dems have royally infiltrated our ranks. Some media reporter was going to a Newt affair and said the plane was full of Dems going to the same place. I’m also afraid they’ve been registering Repub...


3 posted on 02/08/2012 2:17:22 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum
The (strangely) titled article doesn't even explain why Obammy savors Santorum's sweep. It's a nothing burger.

Maybe you can explain why Obammy savors Santorum's sweep...or why an article that doesn't have anything to do with its headline was posted.

4 posted on 02/08/2012 2:19:22 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

bullshit!


5 posted on 02/08/2012 2:20:02 PM PST by pgkdan (Rick Santorum 2012. Conservative's last, best chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum
the big winner might have been Democratic President Barack Obama.

That's a steaming pantload if I ever saw one. I'm guessing the talking points have gone out and that's the new tactic.
6 posted on 02/08/2012 2:21:33 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Here I sit with “The 5” on in the background and I hear the moderates and leftists all agreeing that Obama was the big winner last night.


7 posted on 02/08/2012 2:23:44 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: And2TheRepublic
"What is up with you and the inability to add more of an excerpt?"

Because when it's heavily excerpted, the headline looks like it might be some serious White House insider info.

When more of the article is exposed, it becomes readily evident that it's merely speculation on the part of the editorialist writing from his mom's basement.

8 posted on 02/08/2012 2:23:44 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

Unbelievable that Santorum is given no credit; everyone who voted for him did so just because they don’t want Romney to win. (/s)

RS did so well mainly because BO is stupid. BO seems to think BO is invincible, that he can spit on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and no one will really care. BO stinks! and will go the way of all foul odors.

If I were as classless as BO, I’d probably want to start a war, too.


9 posted on 02/08/2012 2:26:02 PM PST by MSSC6644 (Defeat Satan. Pray the Rosary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum
Why bother to post a vapid editorial with no content, no logic and no information supporting the headline? The premise is stupid to start with and there is nothing in the short editorial which even supports the ridiculous premise.

Are you just an Obama supporter trying to hurt Santorum?

10 posted on 02/08/2012 2:26:11 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: And2TheRepublic; humblegunner; shibumi

Look at its posting history. Pure pimping. It would be beneath him to interact with us.


11 posted on 02/08/2012 2:26:45 PM PST by Larry Lucido (My doctor told me to curtail my Walpoling activities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Which means that FauxRomney is also getting the DNC fax.


12 posted on 02/08/2012 2:26:54 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
“bullshit!”

My sentiments perzaktly!. A pot full of it. Obamer is filling his Egyptian cotton undies right now.

13 posted on 02/08/2012 2:28:19 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

Romney should dropout now. Somebody as far left as him has no business in the Republican party. Because of this, he is tearing the party apart.


14 posted on 02/08/2012 2:28:38 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Jimmy Carter was overjoyed when the GOP nominated that amiable dunce who was too old and over the hill to actually win an election. How did that turn out?


Seven reasons for Rick Santorum


  1. Who has won the most states without the benefit of their own money, last election's organization or a billionaire casino sugar daddy?
  2. Who is everybody's second choice when he isn't their first?
  3. Who can get both the Romney people and the Gingrich people, who hate each other, to vote for him?
  4. Who has the best record on immigration?
  5. Who has the best plan for repealing ObamaCare? And is the only GOP candidate who didn't help write or approve legislation which helped spawn this fiasco?
  6. Who has the best plan for expanding the American economy and strengthening American families?
  7. Who is the closest thing we have to the "generic Republican" which polls show consistently beating Obama and is most likely to make the election about Obama's sorry record rather than about himself?

15 posted on 02/08/2012 2:30:56 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

The “editorial boarad” might object to such fraternization.

See the thread header.


16 posted on 02/08/2012 2:30:58 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

We all know of one Democrat who has infiltrated the Republican party, his name is Willard Romney.


17 posted on 02/08/2012 2:31:29 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

mr obama is like global warming to the media, it just always is


18 posted on 02/08/2012 2:31:39 PM PST by italianquaker ( Mr Obama inherited an AAA rating and made it AA, thnx Resident Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

I think Obama may not like a Santorum sweep. The one man that can actually make a case against Obamacare is Santorum.

Face reality, Newt is not liked because of character issues. Romney is a liberal.

Santorum may just be the person to win it.


19 posted on 02/08/2012 2:33:27 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Some media reporter was going to a Newt affair

Bad choice of words there.

20 posted on 02/08/2012 2:35:17 PM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

I expect nothing less for a loosertarin paper as the O.C. register


21 posted on 02/08/2012 2:35:48 PM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

Perhaps the OCR writers could pass a message to Barack?

Your laundry list of failures and strategies to undermine America, are all that Rick needs to kick your butt back to Chicago....if not Kenya.


22 posted on 02/08/2012 2:36:14 PM PST by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: And2TheRepublic
What is up with you and the inability to add more of an excerpt?

Exactly. The rule is 300 words or 50% if it is a short article

23 posted on 02/08/2012 2:38:33 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; All

.

Who has the best record on immigration?

________________________

Santorum’s record on immigration is pure RINO:

Santorum:

Voted AGAINST increasing the number of immigration investigators:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00201

VOTED AGAINST HIRING AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 BORDER PATROL AGENTS, paid for by reductions in state grants.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00179

VOTED TO GIVE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00058

Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00154

SANTORUM: Trim Social Security now- even if painful.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7O34Bpp42k-IlMMNiOLBkYF2zNw?docId=b1cff9ecefe24ca6ae1764a09761e361

VOTED AGAINST FOOD STAMP REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00353

VOTED AGAINST MEDICAID REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00352

Voted to increase the social services block grant from $1 BILLION to $2 BILLION
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00302

VOTED TO RAID SOCIAL SECURITY instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00056

Voted to impose a uniform federal tax mandate on states to force them to allow convicted , rapists, arsonists drug kingpins and all other ex-convicts to vote in federal elections.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00031

.

Santorum; Big government spender:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt6XCZz2X1Y&feature=player_embedded

__________________________

Santorum needs to put his country before his ego and drop out.

.


24 posted on 02/08/2012 2:38:55 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

“...has yet to win over the conservative core of the party...”

News flash. The onerous Romney has about as much chance of winning over the conservative core as did John Kerry, for much the same reason.

Well, in all fairness, the onerous Romney hasn’t, at least yet, committed open treason.

It was probably never politically expedient for him to do so, naked pragmatism apparently his sole core value.


25 posted on 02/08/2012 2:40:13 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Anyone that truly believes Obama wants to face anyone other than Romney, who has his own government Health Care plan which will neuter him from addressing Obama’s, has nullified themselves as a credible commentator.

Anyone easily contrasted with Obama, figures heavily in every Obama nightmare related to the November general election.

The more baggage they have, the more Obama relishes a match-up.


26 posted on 02/08/2012 2:40:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

It’s just an opinion piece by someone who is speculating


27 posted on 02/08/2012 2:41:44 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; cripplecreek

I think that the OC Register is saying that Bammy’s drooling has more to do with perceived “anyone-but-Romney sentiment” among Republican voters than it does with Santorum. He still expects that Romney will win the nomination, only to have a lot of Republicans stay home on election day.


28 posted on 02/08/2012 2:42:06 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: And2TheRepublic; Joe 6-pack; Larry Lucido; humblegunner; shibumi; landsbaum

The Poster placed the editorial from the Orange County Register in the News forum and then excerpted it according to Free Republic’s copyright restrictions. Ocregister.com is on the excerpt and link list.

Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts


29 posted on 02/08/2012 2:44:07 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Probably because no one can believe Santorum has the staying power to make a contest out of it. They may well be right.
30 posted on 02/08/2012 2:45:33 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The article says it’s because he’s enjoying the infighting.

I thought it might say that Santorum’s wins lessen the chance of a Gingrich candidacy.

In fact, Zero might have purposely started this whole Santorum surge with his birth control pronunciamento, Gingrich being the one who will give him the toughest challenge.


31 posted on 02/08/2012 2:49:05 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: And2TheRepublic; landsbaum; All; onyx; Admin Moderator

Landsbaum is a column writer for this newspaper. He does not comment after he posts a piece of the column, therfore you have to click on his newspaper to read the rest.

He has been told before he has to post the whole article, but he doesn’t. He has posted a slew of articles in the last two-three days, commenting on none.


32 posted on 02/08/2012 2:58:53 PM PST by Marcella (Newt will smash Hussein in debates. Newt needs money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Here I sit with “The 5” on in the background and I hear the moderates and leftists all agreeing that Obama was the big winner last night.”

The Five should be more aptly called the TWO! Dana Perino is so far into the toilet for Romney, I’m surprised she doesn’t wear water wings to the studio. Then you have that fat turd Marxist Bob Beckel. The only one who has any intellect at all is Greg Gutfeld. Overall, Fox is so far in the tank for Romney that you have to surmise that the word is out from the top. They will be loosing viewers at an ever increasing rate as the election nears.


33 posted on 02/08/2012 3:01:19 PM PST by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
The article says it’s because he’s enjoying the infighting.

No, the article doesn't say that. The article speculates that......"The president must be enjoying the Republicans infighting."

34 posted on 02/08/2012 3:01:19 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: patriot08; All
Yeah, you can cherry-pick a few votes because you don't like him. Or you can actually go to his comprehensive record on immigration and see what an organization who knows something about the topic has to say with the data to back it up.
35 posted on 02/08/2012 3:06:38 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

The only reason I had the 5 on today was for background noise and there was nothing else on.


36 posted on 02/08/2012 3:07:56 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

A few votes??
This is pure RINO:

Santorum:

Voted AGAINST increasing the number of immigration investigators:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00201

VOTED AGAINST HIRING AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 BORDER PATROL AGENTS, paid for by reductions in state grants.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00179

VOTED TO GIVE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00058

Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00154

SANTORUM: Trim Social Security now- even if painful.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7O34Bpp42k-IlMMNiOLBkYF2zNw?docId=b1cff9ecefe24ca6ae1764a09761e361

VOTED AGAINST FOOD STAMP REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00353

VOTED AGAINST MEDICAID REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00352


37 posted on 02/08/2012 3:14:04 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

If you are going to post a list like this you must be a Romney supporter! No liberals needed here. If you are a Newt supporter trying to tank Santorum, I could post a factual 2 pager that makes your list like child play.


38 posted on 02/08/2012 3:34:40 PM PST by FresnoRobert (When born, you cried and the world rejoiced. Live your life so that when you die, it's reversed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

When the dust clears Santorum may be the one to beat Obama. I think he’ll clean up real nice.


39 posted on 02/08/2012 3:35:12 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
You need to get over your hatred against Rick Rick Santorum. He voted for your information with the Majority Leader, who was at that time Senator Frist of Tennessee except for 2 times. Besides Senator Frist, Santorum voted with many of his other fellow Republicans.

If anyone needs to drop out it is Ron Paul, who is in last place and has yet to win a state. Why don't you demand from him to drop out?

GO SANTORUM GO

40 posted on 02/08/2012 3:43:13 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactamundo.


41 posted on 02/08/2012 4:04:53 PM PST by SueRae (I can see November from my HOUSE!!!!!!!! 11.06.2012, the Tower of Sauron falls,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FresnoRobert

If you are going to post a list like this you must be a Romney supporter! No liberals needed here. If you are a Newt supporter trying to tank Santorum, I could post a factual 2 pager that makes your list like child play.

______________________________

I am a Newt supporter- and I wouldn’t advise posting your ‘2 pager’against Newt. Newt is Mr. Robinson’s choice.


42 posted on 02/08/2012 4:05:56 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Marcella; landsbaum; All
Landsbaum is a column writer for this newspaper. He does not comment after he posts a piece of the column, therfore you have to click on his newspaper to read the rest.

He has been told before he has to post the whole article, but he doesn’t. He has posted a slew of articles in the last two-three days, commenting on none.


If you or anyone else have told him that "he has to post the whole article," then they are giving out poor advice. Copyright restrictions imposed upon Free Republic prohibit Posters from posting "the whole article" from the Orange County Register. Only an excerpt and link are permitted.

Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts

43 posted on 02/08/2012 4:17:32 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
Sounds like you like seeing facts about candidates. For instance, Newt started politics by supporting Nelson Rockefeller's 1968 presidential campaign. Is that really relevant to today? As someone else pointed out, you cite a host of votes Rick took where he voted with the Majority Leader. Does that reflect his core beliefs? On the core issues there isn't a doubt. On Global warming, healthcare, life, killing entitlement, etc. Rick is as strong or stronger on the issues. I can list the exact dates and votes of Newt expanding programs and spending money but that only helps Romney. Maybe you should start supporting the most conservative guy running or quit trying to tear down fellow conservatives. Rick was the better man today and said he would not ask Newt to get out of the race.
44 posted on 02/08/2012 4:22:33 PM PST by FresnoRobert (When born, you cried and the world rejoiced. Live your life so that when you die, it's reversed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FresnoRobert

That little RINO voting weasel doesn’t have a Chinaman’s chance of winning...and if he did, Obama would crucify him.
If you got the ‘goods’ on Newt, let us see it.
I don’t think you do.
I posted how Ricardo voted with the links to back it up.


45 posted on 02/08/2012 4:51:07 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; landsbaum; Mark Landsbaum; Marcella; And2TheRepublic; Larry Lucido; ...
"If you or anyone else have told him that "he has to post the whole article," then they are giving out poor advice. Copyright restrictions imposed upon Free Republic prohibit Posters from posting "the whole article" from the Orange County Register. Only an excerpt and link are permitted."

I'm pretty sure that most of us understand that there are certain publications that have insisted on "excerpt only" status. We are used to this kind of stuff from the hostile elements in the MSM since it's not in their best interests to foster commentary on their ill conceived opinions and distortion of facts.

What's really galling to many contributing FReepers is a supposedly "conservative" newspaper first placing those kind of restrictions on us and then turning around and having one of their writers use the excerpt feature on FR as if it were their own personal hit farm. (That, and doing it from two separate FReeper accounts as well!)

Mark Landsbaum has made it quite clear (in the few isolated instances where he has actually replied to a poster on FR) that he's here primarily to promote hits for his paper and his personal blog, which he is shielding under the excerpt aegis of the OC Register.

In this respect, Landsbaum is a double spammer and as one poster has pointed out early in this thread, he only posts a minimal sentence or two, rather than the 300 word excerpt normally allowed. This makes it even harder to determine the true nature of the content which in this case is quite disappointing, given the hype in the title.

If Mr. Landsbaum were approaching this as a member of the community, interacting with those commenting on his posts, then perhaps there would be less rancor.

But as long as he persists in pimping rather than participating, he can expect to earn only the skeptical derision of those who are, at this very moment, trying to keep the Good Ship FreeRepublic afloat.

He'll just have to pardon us if lining his pockets isn't our top priority.
46 posted on 02/08/2012 4:53:32 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: landsbaum

Rick Santorum is the only Republican candidate who is different enough from Obama to beat him. Romney is so close to Obama that even George Soros said there is little difference between them. Given that, why would people vote for a change? ‘These guys are the same so why change from what we have got’?


47 posted on 02/08/2012 5:02:07 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi; Admin Moderator; landsbaum; Mark Landsbaum; Marcella; And2TheRepublic

To summarize, landsbaum see FreeRepublic as his b!tch to be used the way he wants with nothing offered in return.

Hell with the blogpimp.


48 posted on 02/08/2012 5:11:12 PM PST by Larry Lucido (My doctor told me to curtail my Walpoling activities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: shibumi; Admin Moderator

Agreed.

I don’t appreciate giving privately of my own hard earned money for free advertising for someone’s sole self-admitted purpose of posting on FR to be using it to line his pockets.

Besides, how many accounts could I carry and admit to, that FR and the mods would tolerate?

Can I open another account and post on it?


49 posted on 02/08/2012 5:14:01 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

I love it when you sweet talk.


50 posted on 02/08/2012 5:24:16 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson