Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How disastrous was Santorumís endorsement of Specter? Can you say "Obamacare?"
Legal Insurrection ^ | December 30, 2011 | William A. Jacobson

Posted on 02/08/2012 3:37:31 PM PST by red flanker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-125 next last
Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: svcw

“Many people were uncomfortable with impeachment of a sitting president, it is a road many just did not want to go down.”

The Senate refused to impeach Clinton because they didn’t want Gore to be a sitting president at election time.


52 posted on 02/08/2012 4:33:12 PM PST by kitkat (Obama, rope and chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I don’t who Bill Collier is. Read the book, or at the least read up on the book, and whether it was adjudged reliable or a truly factual account of the times... who cares who posted the excerpts of the book... it is the veracity of the experts not the webmaster...


53 posted on 02/08/2012 4:34:29 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PjhCPA
If he would have turned his back on him no one would have ever helped him again.

You are totally right. If Santorum would have backed Toomey, he would have lost support from the state GOP and the WH. People don't realize how expensive and hard PA is to run state wide. You have 2 major media markets to pay for and lots of small ones in between. Philly alone is murder to pay for.

54 posted on 02/08/2012 4:34:53 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: red flanker
Well if that's the game you're playing, how about we go over that "government shutdown" that had Newt running with his tail tucked?

What a despicable post, as if Santorum was responsible for what Specter did. With Bush against Toomey, it was unlikely his endorsement amounted to squat.

55 posted on 02/08/2012 4:38:43 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Yes! that “garbage” was the women - the dems once called them the nuts and sluts - and the senate didn’t want any part of it... that’s why holier-than-thou Sanctimonium and Lott doublecrossed them... they didn’t want women, i.e., garbage in the senate. It makes me upset just typing this post to you about it...


56 posted on 02/08/2012 4:39:23 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

This assumes that Pat Toomey could have beaten the democrat who surely would have run against him. Could he have won? 2 years later, Pennsylvania voted out a conservative by 17 points, so it appears there was a limit to their support for solid conservatives.

Heck, in a WAVE year for Republicans, Toomey only beat Sestack by 2%.

But maybe the democrats would have been so shocked by the upset of Specter that they wouldn’t have had time to play their ballot games and put Casey up against him.

Interesting though. Suppose they had? Then Casey would have beat Toomey. Santorum would have won in 2006, having NOT to run against Casey, and not having angered conservatives. So Santorum would have been the 60th vote, and Obamacare wouldn’t have passed.

So it’s Santorum’s fault for losing his election. That’s the ticket.


57 posted on 02/08/2012 4:39:23 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA

[There is a smile on Kennedy’s face but his eyes aren’t smiling.]

I think the clinical term is “untreated alcoholism.”


58 posted on 02/08/2012 4:39:56 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Newtrians?


59 posted on 02/08/2012 4:40:15 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
I'm with you. I live in PA and I've had issues with Santorum. But those pale in comparison to the issues I have had with Paul, Romney and Obama.

I will not bash either Newt or Santorum, I will save my fire for the real opponent. We shouldn't be damaging the anti-Romneys so much that they can't run against Obama if one does happen to bring down Mr. GOP-E Inevitable.

60 posted on 02/08/2012 4:42:52 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
YOU may be "over it" but deluded folks are trying to paint Santorum as "The True Conservative" and there's no pony in what they're trying shovel with that claim.

He's establishment. He's a conservative of convenient who talks up marriage and life as cover for his record.

61 posted on 02/08/2012 4:43:08 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

You know, Clinton was my governor before being elected president. I wrote that he’d have a constant stream of women in and out of the oval office and was ridiculed in print! Santorum was right not to want to go forward with impeachment for this. To be honest, nearly all the democratic presidents, and a couple republican ones had also had dalliances going on. That was not a reason to impeach. We SHOULD have tried to impeach on articles of treason, for selling the Chinese our submarine intelligence and other things, lots of them. But letters to our Congressmen/women were not returned. Some were taking up the issue, but it was not making traction where it needed to be. Anyway, the point is that his infidelity and his lying about it were not really impeachable things, just contempt of court issues. Anytime republicans take issue with democrats on character issues, it never ends pretty for the republicans. They then went after several republicans who then resigned or were asked to step down, and though most of them were later exonerated, it was not publicly. The republicans were making a circus out of the whole affair. I’m glad that someone had the sense to stop it. It should’ve been handled in a private manner, not open public hearings. I was living overseas by then and it was embarrassing. The world was not shocked by his behavior...they had read enough about him to know what he was going to do, but they felt that we republicans had handled the issue poorly.

The Christian manner of dealing with this type of thing is to talk to the person privately. If that does not work, you take your clergy, or his, and talk with the person. IF that does not help, you then denounce the person publicly. Bill Clinton did not run as a conservative, you remember. He made no pretenses of being a conservative. Before him, you had Barney Franks affair with an intern and running a gay brothel from his home, with no penalties. To me, that was a breach of trust because of the abuse of the young intern, and if the public pays rent for the Congressman’s house, then that was criminal use. He should’ve been thrown out. So, this was small potatoes in relation to that. I realize you must hate Santorum, but had you been in his shoes, you might have done the same thing. To save the republicans from the total disaster of making a fool of themselves, and they were well on the way to it.


62 posted on 02/08/2012 4:45:35 PM PST by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I will take a politician like Toomey any day over any democrat counterpart. In real world we must live in, no one is pure as white snow. We must look at overall effect. Even Sarah Palin endorsed McCain in his senate bid against a much more conservative candidate.


63 posted on 02/08/2012 4:53:57 PM PST by entropy12 (Islam is intolerant of every other religion. Western countries are finally learning this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: montag813
"President Bush personally asked Santorum to back Specter. How many Republicans asked Newt Gingrich to endorse Dede Scozzafava?"

Wango-Tango! Home Run!! Bravo, encore!!!

64 posted on 02/08/2012 4:56:27 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Not again...Analysis that is quite a stretch, to say the least.

Santorum would not have won his previous races without Specter’s strong backing, especially the 49-47 victory over Worford in 1994. It would have required a lack of integrity on the part of Santorum to have not returned the favor when Specter found his own self in a pinch. Specter had also been a staunch and outspoken opponent of such health care schemes in the past.

And while it is possible, there is no guarantee that Toomey would have been able to defeat Hoeffel in the general election, as Kerry carried the state at the top of the ticket. Odds are probably against. Hoeffel would have certainly been right there voting for Obamacare had he been in the Senate rather than Toomey or Specter.

Let’s stick with reality when it comes to analysis...that isn’t asking too much.


65 posted on 02/08/2012 4:58:18 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shery

No, I don’t hate Santorum. I have read your post twice now, and copied it to read again later.

I do think your word “circus” - from what I have read so far - is really spot on...

I could go into a long boring discourse about what I really don’t like about Sanctimonium is the way he abrogates the work of Christ with his so-called quality character so much better than Newt’s, and the fact a few days ago in CO, he told a group of evangelicals, “God called me to do this.”

But it’s late and I’m tired, though I am going to chew on your post a bit more when I get some time... I just think all of them should be put in a major time-out until they grow up...


66 posted on 02/08/2012 5:03:34 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FresnoRobert
"Romneycare was the template for Obamacare. Newt advocated government mandated healthcare."

And because santorum endorsed and campaigned hard for spector it is now the law of the land. That was a razor close election and without santorum's hard work spector would not have won, period!

Now lets talk about rick's tax plan where he triples the child tax credit. We already have 47% who pay no income tax and most receive a refund on taxes they didn't pay. That number will increase at least 10% under his plan. Not to mention it encourages irresponsible people to have more children. santorm was a lock step Bush compassionate conservative, he is the big government candidate in this race.
67 posted on 02/08/2012 5:07:33 PM PST by JoSixChip (Top 10% of wage earners pay 70% of total income taxes collected. Bottom 50% pay less then 3%, fair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Rick Santorum, megalomaniac mental case.

Pond scum lawyer is being bankrolled by Romney supporters (stalking horse) and voted to force workers to belong to unions and pay dues against their will, then lost by 17% in his reelection because he endorsed Specter over Toomey.

Specter then voted for Obamacare.

Then he endorses that degenerate Romney in 2008, and his family in Italy are all communists.

Yeah, a real “conservative”

HE’LL STAY IN THE RACE LONG ENOUGH TO ENSURE THE MORMON BISHOPS CORONATION AND THEN CUT A DEAL WITH THE CULTIST.

I guess winning Missouri is easy when Gingrich isn’t even on the ballot.

He should go back to chasing ambulances.


68 posted on 02/08/2012 5:07:52 PM PST by Rome2000 (MYTH ROMNEY IS A MORMON MELCHIDEZEK HIGH PRIEST AND SANTORUM IS BANKROLLED BY ROMNEY SUPPORTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shery
We SHOULD have tried to impeach on articles of treason, for selling the Chinese our submarine intelligence and other things, lots of them.

Important point. The congressmen certainly knew about those things, they knew about the corruption and treason, but for whatever reason they weren't allowed to go after those things. So they went after him on what was by comparison extremely small potatoes.

For something that mattered hardly at all, we got Ken Starr and endless investigations (that went no where). For something that really did matter, we got a supposed investigation bottled up in the Justice Department, that was quietly shelved after GW became president.

So, whats up with that?

Clinton met with the head of the Chinese military industries more often than he met with Monica, and the DNC had to return millions of Chinese dollars, but the GOP grandees didn't think that was worth impeachment or even a hearing.

69 posted on 02/08/2012 5:09:23 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Wango-Tango! Home Run!! Bravo, encore!!! Well, then, what kind of bravo does Newt get from you, when he walked out of the Rose Garden ceremony, telling HW that it was the hardest thing he'd ever done in his life, but he couldn't support him on his tax increases... That takes a set...
70 posted on 02/08/2012 5:09:56 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Specter was actually up in 2010, not 2008. Senators serve 6 year terms.

However, noteworthy is the fact at that the time of Santorum’s endorsement, Specter had a strong history of opposing such health care schemes, and is regarded as one of the key architects in illustrating how horrific government run healthcare was back in the debate over Hillarycare. He directed his staff to make a complete list of all of the boards, commissions, etc. that would have created a bureaucratic nightmare and they in turn used it to create a chart for him - Senator Bob Dole used the chart in his response to Clinton’s State of the Union address and he referred to it as his ‘best friend’. The chart helped to illustrate to the public how awful this kind of healthcare scheme is.

Here’s a video of Specter from 1994 on the floor of the Senate discussing the chart:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73WIYWWiAlA&feature=related


71 posted on 02/08/2012 5:12:10 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: marron
For something that really did matter, we got a supposed investigation bottled up in the Justice Department, that was quietly shelved after GW became president.

Well, couldn't somebody just reopen that investigation...

72 posted on 02/08/2012 5:13:46 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Integrity vs morality, maybe integrity vs honesty, how about integrity vs actual beliefs - is there a place where I can look that up for politicians?

Since when does returning a favor rank even close to anything else that most profess to be actual - you know decent traits for politicians?


73 posted on 02/08/2012 5:14:24 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
"Specter had a strong history of opposing such health care schemes"

Please, I knew spector was scum and everybody on FR knew it and posted such. rick knew what he was endorsing, but he did it anyway. He put party over principal and he will do it again. He was a establishment tool when he was in office and he would be again given the chance. That is why he lost his last election in a record defeat. That has not been publicized...YET!
74 posted on 02/08/2012 5:17:22 PM PST by JoSixChip (Top 10% of wage earners pay 70% of total income taxes collected. Bottom 50% pay less then 3%, fair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Rick Santorum, megalomaniac mental case. Pond scum lawyer is being bankrolled by Romney supporters (stalking horse) and voted to force workers to belong to unions and pay dues against their will, then lost by 17% in his reelection because he endorsed Specter over Toomey. Specter then voted for Obamacare. Then he endorses that degenerate Romney in 2008, and his family in Italy are all communists. Yeah, a real “conservative” HE’LL STAY IN THE RACE LONG ENOUGH TO ENSURE THE MORMON BISHOPS CORONATION AND THEN CUT A DEAL WITH THE CULTIST. I guess winning Missouri is easy when Gingrich isn’t even on the ballot. He should go back to chasing ambulances.

Ah, the cut and paste nonsense returns, with a few added inaccuracies. Gingrich was on the ballot in the other two contests from the same day which you conveniently left out.

75 posted on 02/08/2012 5:18:10 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
"Well, then, what kind of bravo does Newt get from you..."

Here it is in Herman German... Nine! Nine! Nine!!!

And here I thought you were getting too tired to reply anymore today... Pfffffft!!!

76 posted on 02/08/2012 5:18:36 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Yet another hit piece, you need to get over it Red.


77 posted on 02/08/2012 5:22:09 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

That’s not a response to what I said. Try sticking to the facts rather than emotion.


78 posted on 02/08/2012 5:22:45 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

IT’S WORTH REMINDING EVERYONE HOW THIS MONSTROSITY BECAME THE LAW OF THE LAND, AND WHO IS MOST RESPONSIBLE.

IF YOU DON’T WANT TO WADE THROUGH THE WHOLE THING JUST READ THE LAST PARAGRAPH:

Evil, or just Stupid?

October/November 2009 and ObamaCare was stalled in the House, the main sticking point being government funded abortions. There were enough Dems opposed to abortion that refused to vote for the ObamaCare if it contained any abortion language that it would not pass.

Representative Stupak (D) MI introduced his amendment that prohibited any government money from ObamaCare bill being used to fund abortions. This essentially would end all abortions, as no medical procedures outside the ObamaCare System can be done. No going to a doctor and paying him directly for anything. Thus, with his amendment, ALL abortions would be illegal.

This amendment to the House bill, if it passed, would give the above ‘Pro-Life’ Democrats a green light to vote for the ObamaCare bill.

Not enough Democrats supported the Stupak Amendment for it to pass. Many Democrats were vociferously opposed to it. It could only pass with Republican votes.

National Right to Life favored the Stupak Amendment, and insisted that Republicans vote for it. Further, they threatened any Republican who didn’t vote for it with their active opposition to that Republican during the 2010 fall election.

The Republicans caved, even those who could see the eventual outcome, right down to the last man. One hundred percent voted for the Stupak Amendment, along with a bunch of Dems who were opposed to abortions. Stupak handily passed.

Nobody believed the Amendment would stick; eventually it would/will be overridden in some fashion and Government funded abortion would become part of ObamaCare. Abortion is the Prime Sacrament of the Left, and will not be denied government funding, let alone be made illegal.

With a green light, the ’Pro-Life’ Dems could vote for ObamaCare, and although many hard-line Leftists were angry, enough of them also could see the end game, and agreed to vote pass ObamaCare.

A couple days later ObamaCare passed the House.

Everyone knew how this would play out, and it did. Rush spoke about it on his show.

I am of the opinion even National Right to Life knew it would play out this way. I’m not aware of anyone who thought otherwise. That leaves us with two opinions of their leadership;

The NRTL is Stupid Strategy;

1. They are so locked into their ‘stop abortion at all costs’ viewpoint that they can’t operate with a strategy that goes beyond 24 hours. Liberals like to say that ‘conservatives are stupid and easily lead’, this situation is circumstantial proof that Leftists are right from time to time. This is the NRTL Stupid Strategy.
OR

The NRTL is Evil Strategy;

2. They were in cahoots with the Pro-Abort crowd on this, and were complicit in getting ObamaCare passed in the House, ObamaCare which will include a monthly premium from all of us to fund abortions. This would be the NRTL Evil Strategy.

Either way, too stupid, or just evil, they are unfit to lead the movement to reduce or end abortions. Their thuggish actions have brought us to the brink of the enslavement of 300 million Americans, ending of the most advanced medical care in the entire history of the world, and will lead, ironically, to Chinese style government mandated and government funded abortions.

I am unaware of any other organization which has played such a pivotal role against Americans and babies in the ObamaCare fight as National Right to Life has.


79 posted on 02/08/2012 5:23:03 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Don’t tell me, let me guess, you support Tricky Ricky Sanctimonium - I can always spot you judgmental rigid humorless holier-than-thou types a mile away...

Actually, some of the interesting thoughtful posts here (not any of yours to be sure) have rejuvenated me...

I think you need a nap, though.


80 posted on 02/08/2012 5:28:09 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Thank you! :)


81 posted on 02/08/2012 5:29:20 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MVV

“This has been a big problem for me for a long time...”

Me too....BUT I am willing to overlook it! It was a huge mistake on his part! The thing is...I wonder if he realizes that!!


82 posted on 02/08/2012 5:30:06 PM PST by Cricket24 (Proud to be a CONSERVATIVE WOMAN!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MVV

“This has been a big problem for me for a long time...”

Me too....BUT I am willing to overlook it! It was a huge mistake on his part! The thing is...I wonder if he realizes that!!


83 posted on 02/08/2012 5:30:20 PM PST by Cricket24 (Proud to be a CONSERVATIVE WOMAN!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I pose this question to you, but all other Dick Santorum supporters please feel free to respond.

Do you SERIOUSLY think that a union loving lawyer whose campaign is being bankrolled by MORMON ROMNEY SUPPORTERS to take out Gingrich has any shot of getting the nomination?

Or are you all just so retarded or mesmerized by a sweater vest that you can't see a con?

84 posted on 02/08/2012 5:34:14 PM PST by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
"Try sticking to the facts rather than emotion."

It was a visceral response. I felt the premise of your post was based on a lie. A lie I was compelled to correct. To assert that santorum didn't know spector was scum when every one else did is not credible.
85 posted on 02/08/2012 5:34:44 PM PST by JoSixChip (Top 10% of wage earners pay 70% of total income taxes collected. Bottom 50% pay less then 3%, fair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“and Toomey gave us gays in the military”

Uh...they were already IN the military. They just couldn’t say they were gay AND to be honest, THAT was a stupid POLICY to have in a supposed FREE country!


86 posted on 02/08/2012 5:35:46 PM PST by Cricket24 (Proud to be a CONSERVATIVE WOMAN!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

And before that, Clarence Thomas. Specter was also instrumental in deconstructing the smear job against him and saving that nomination. That was another item that was a much more prominent part of Specter’s resume at the time of Santorum’s endorsement in addition to his efforts to block Hillarycare...and probably also looking out for his state since seniority is such a huge factor in the pecking order of the Senate (that is a purely political consideration, no doubt...take it for what it is worth). This article judges the endorsement based mostly on things that happened well after that day that were not part of the equation at the time.


87 posted on 02/08/2012 5:42:47 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

No.
The House impeaches, the Senate convicts.
The House impeached Clinton, for lying under oath.
The Senate had a trial to remove from office, and found no compelling reason to do so.
Clinton WAS impeached.


88 posted on 02/08/2012 5:47:05 PM PST by svcw (Only difference between Romney & BH is one thinks he will be god & other one thinks he already is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]




Click the Smoke       Thank you, JoeProBono

He's cute and tiny
But they grow up so fast


Become a monthly donor and kill the FReepathon dragons
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up

89 posted on 02/08/2012 5:54:30 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: red flanker

In 1994 Santorum defeated Sen Wofford, a liberal Democrat proponent of HillaryCare.

Since then Santorum has opposed mandates and central govt style approach to healthcare.

It would be sweet justice if Santorum could stand up for life and defeat the pro-abort President Obama and take down and repeal his Obamacare.


90 posted on 02/08/2012 5:57:37 PM PST by WOSG (¬ďLegion of Acceptibility¬Ē)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I can’t stand Specter, but as interrogator of Anita Hill, he also brought us Clarence Thomas.

I saw Santorum and Specter appear with Pres. Bush at a stadium rally in 2004. There were cheers for Bush, loud adoration for Santorum, and hearty boos for Specter. If I recall correctly, Pres. Bush feared losing Specter’s sure Senate seat and requested Santorum’s support. Judges were the issue. It was hard to swallow, but Santorum was helping his President in the context of 2004.

It’s kind of hard to predict unintended consequences of not yet conceived issues. I’m glad for the three fine justices, and Specter remained a weasel, then a spectre.


91 posted on 02/08/2012 6:02:36 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

It’s really sad when you can’t add anymore... Thanks for the correction. Now I have to go get my post deleted..... :-)


92 posted on 02/08/2012 6:12:56 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Thanks for having my back. Feel like I’m traveling in enemy territory here lately.


93 posted on 02/08/2012 6:25:36 PM PST by PjhCPA (Game On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

No question that Santorum sports an enormous wart by the name of Arlen.
I can overlook it if need be.
Gingrich is far better IMO but all I require is credible conservatism and pro-life conviction.
Santorum would appoint decent judges.
He’s probably serious in his remarks about space exploration, which means he’s a small-minded fellow and no leader of consequence, but I’d take that.
He’d lose in November, but not by much, and he won’t cause us to lose the House.
Long as it’s not Romney, I’m at peace with it.


94 posted on 02/08/2012 6:29:19 PM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Can you say “Cornhusker Kickback? I’m sure Ben Nelson is heaving a sigh of relief that he’s off the hook for that one.


95 posted on 02/08/2012 7:33:30 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

you say that as if it was something new. LOL


96 posted on 02/08/2012 7:55:49 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MVV

It’s called Senatorial courtesy, endorsing a fellow Senator of one’s own party as long as there are no ethics charges. In retrospect, it was a mistake, but I say let bye-gones be bye-gones.


97 posted on 02/08/2012 8:08:26 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

That explains why Rick is so passionate about repealing this boondoggle!


98 posted on 02/08/2012 8:15:11 PM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
As filled with self-righteous certitude as you appear to be leads me to believe that you can never allow yourself to fall asleep lest someone pull your covers and find you out and expose your sins to the whole world in one inglorius event.

Myopia rules your commentary and really makes you look quite simplistic with your platitudinous criticism that is totally without foundation. Here's a quarter... call someone who cares what you think.

With your attitude you'll never get anyone worthwhile to see anything your way and you'll grow old early, bitter, destitute and very lonely. In other words... get help!!!

99 posted on 02/08/2012 9:50:20 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: MVV; All

Santorum said Alito would not be a Justice if it weren’t for Specter. Specter was very effective at being the head of the Judicial Committee.

Rick Santorum realized that the Dems would have control of the Judicial Committee, if the GOP didn’t have the majority in the Senate, and he thought Specter would have the best chance of winning, as well as being an effective head of the Judicial Committee.


100 posted on 02/09/2012 12:50:15 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson