Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

OK for me, but not for thee.
1 posted on 02/09/2012 6:18:10 PM PST by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smokingfrog

Are they going to use suppressors on their flashbangs, since their hearing is important?


2 posted on 02/09/2012 6:21:08 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

They already have them. They’re called ‘Internal Affairs’.


3 posted on 02/09/2012 6:26:51 PM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

>> In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Illinois SWAT Gets OK on Silencers, smokingfrog wrote:
OK for me, but not for thee.

My idea on where to draw the line on “banned” weapons —

If the cops can have them, then ordinary citizens can, too. ‘cause really, you’re talking about the dividing line between military and police/militia — not between police and the citizenry.

Silencers? Full auto weapons? Body armor, short-barrel shotguns, personnel carriers? Fine! If cops want to have ‘em, citizens can possess them too. No permits required.

Nuclear weapons, RPGs, shoulder fired AA missiles? Probably not, for either cops OR civilians.


4 posted on 02/09/2012 6:27:49 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Well, that’s nice to know. Don’t want to disturb anyone’s sleep when the SWAT team arrives in the middle of the night to dispatch a bunch of “terrorists”; and that would be “terrorists” as defined by the Obama regime... meaning anyone that disagrees with them.


8 posted on 02/09/2012 6:37:39 PM PST by 6SJ7 (Meh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

There are no telling how many laws that the government has made and exempted themselves from.


15 posted on 02/09/2012 6:48:26 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Even europe has no restrictions on silencers.


16 posted on 02/09/2012 6:53:14 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
This will help with those “accidental discharges” around the house and station, too. Less embarrassing.
17 posted on 02/09/2012 6:54:28 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Within ten years - APCs in the streets.

To serve and protect.


18 posted on 02/09/2012 7:00:54 PM PST by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I’m good with silencers. The last man standing cleans up the mess and claims nothing ever happened! ;^)


27 posted on 02/09/2012 7:57:39 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

For their safety, put them in armored vehicles with turrets to help avoid hearing loss.


32 posted on 02/09/2012 10:08:42 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I Illinois they don’t even want you having a gun at all.


33 posted on 02/09/2012 10:31:47 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Short of it is you can get one but the tax on it is a few hundred dollars and is technically considered a weapon itself.


34 posted on 02/09/2012 10:33:37 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I really woulda thought they’d wear the type of hearing protection that cuts out above a certan decibel level. Voices can be heard, as can gunshots, but damaging noise is eliminated.


37 posted on 02/10/2012 11:25:08 AM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
“Hearing loss of up to 15 seconds can make a big difference between whether hostages are killed or not.”

Why do they want to kill the hostages? Oh, that's right: It's Illinois....

38 posted on 02/10/2012 11:45:01 AM PST by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson